Entregable 1 - Documentación - SRG - #238
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 54 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR adds a complete PRD.md defining the MVP scope, objectives, roles, permissions, functional/technical/security requirements, and appendices for a hospital medical history platform. It also fills in prompts.md with concrete PRD-generation prompts and expands readme.md with project details, architecture, and data model documentation. ChangesDocumentation additions
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~15 minutes Related PRs: None identified from the provided context. Suggested labels: documentation Suggested reviewers: None identified from the provided context. PoemA rabbit hopped through docs today, 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@PRD.md`:
- Around line 119-122: The notification requirement in the Notificaciones
section currently mandates emailing a reusable username and password, which
should be changed. Update the wording to remove password delivery and instead
require a one-time activation link or temporary token with a forced password
reset on first login, keeping the change in the same requirement text so the
onboarding flow is secure.
- Around line 459-475: The flow diagram in the PRD uses a bare fenced block,
which triggers the markdown lint rule. Update the fenced diagram block in PRD.md
to use an explicit language tag such as text so the rendered flow remains
unchanged while staying lint-clean.
- Around line 140-149: The RBAC matrix and the nursing footnote conflict: the
row for Crear/editar perfil médico currently suggests nursing can write profile
data, while the note says nursing only uploads files. Update the permission
matrix and the footnote in PRD.md so the rule is unambiguous, and ensure the
wording for Crear/editar perfil médico, Liberar perfil de paciente, and the
nursing note all agree before any stories are derived.
In `@readme.md`:
- Around line 70-72: The newly added README snippets need markdown cleanup: the
code fences around the profile flow text are unlabeled, and the status callouts
have blank lines inside blockquotes. Update the affected README sections so each
fence has an appropriate language label and remove the empty quoted lines, using
the existing markdown blocks and callout snippets as the targets to normalize.
- Line 314: The role rule in the README is inconsistent with the MVP contract
because it says the administrator only creates staff, while the PRD/Section 1.2
still allows médico/admin to liberar perfiles and create patient users. Update
the role matrix text in the README so the same permissions are reflected
everywhere, using the relevant role definitions and the “liberar perfil” rule as
the source of truth. Ensure the wording for médico, admin, paciente, and staff
creation is aligned and does not contradict the implementation contract.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: c39fdd5e-4e91-463c-92ec-658be27b84ef
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
PRD.mdprompts.mdreadme.md
| ### 6.6 Notificaciones | ||
|
|
||
| - Correo al paciente al liberar su perfil, incluyendo usuario y contraseña de acceso. | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🔒 Security & Privacy | 🟠 Major | 🏗️ Heavy lift
Avoid sending reusable credentials by email.
This requirement bakes a password into email delivery, which is a weak onboarding pattern for a health-data product. Prefer a one-time activation link or temporary token plus a forced password reset on first login.
Suggested wording
- Correo al paciente al liberar su perfil, incluyendo usuario y contraseña de acceso.
+ Correo al paciente al liberar su perfil, con enlace o token de activación de un solo uso y cambio obligatorio de contraseña en el primer acceso.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ### 6.6 Notificaciones | |
| - Correo al paciente al liberar su perfil, incluyendo usuario y contraseña de acceso. | |
| ### 6.6 Notificaciones | |
| - Correo al paciente al liberar su perfil, con enlace o token de activación de un solo uso y cambio obligatorio de contraseña en el primer acceso. |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@PRD.md` around lines 119 - 122, The notification requirement in the
Notificaciones section currently mandates emailing a reusable username and
password, which should be changed. Update the wording to remove password
delivery and instead require a one-time activation link or temporary token with
a forced password reset on first login, keeping the change in the same
requirement text so the onboarding flow is secure.
| | Crear/editar perfil médico (pre-liberación) | — | ✓* | ✓ | ✓ | | ||
| | Liberar perfil de paciente | — | — | ✓ | ✓ | | ||
| | Crear usuario paciente (en liberación) | — | — | ✓ | ✓ | | ||
| | Crear usuarios (otros roles) | — | — | — | ✓** | | ||
| | Listado de pacientes | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | ||
| | Listado de staff interno | — | — | ✓ | ✓ | | ||
| | Editar perfil/archivos post-liberación | — | — | — | — | | ||
|
|
||
| \* Enfermería puede subir archivos; la creación del perfil y edición de datos corresponde a médico/administrador según flujo operativo (ver reglas). | ||
| \*\* Solo administrador puede crear usuarios de staff; médico solo crea pacientes (en liberación). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🔒 Security & Privacy | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
Resolve the RBAC contradiction for nursing.
The matrix grants nursing Crear/editar perfil médico, but the footnote says nursing only uploads files. That ambiguity can easily become an unintended write permission in implementation. Make the matrix and footnote agree before deriving stories.
Suggested wording
-| Crear/editar perfil médico (pre-liberación) | — | ✓* | ✓ | ✓ |
+| Crear/editar perfil médico (pre-liberación) | — | — | ✓ | ✓ |
...
-* Enfermería puede subir archivos; la creación del perfil y edición de datos corresponde a médico/administrador según flujo operativo (ver reglas).
+* Enfermería solo puede subir archivos; la creación y edición de datos del perfil corresponde a médico/administrador.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| | Crear/editar perfil médico (pre-liberación) | — | ✓* | ✓ | ✓ | | |
| | Liberar perfil de paciente | — | — | ✓ | ✓ | | |
| | Crear usuario paciente (en liberación) | — | — | ✓ | ✓ | | |
| | Crear usuarios (otros roles) | — | — | — | ✓** | | |
| | Listado de pacientes | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | |
| | Listado de staff interno | — | — | ✓ | ✓ | | |
| | Editar perfil/archivos post-liberación | — | — | — | — | | |
| \* Enfermería puede subir archivos; la creación del perfil y edición de datos corresponde a médico/administrador según flujo operativo (ver reglas). | |
| \*\* Solo administrador puede crear usuarios de staff; médico solo crea pacientes (en liberación). | |
| | Crear/editar perfil médico (pre-liberación) | — | — | ✓ | ✓ | | |
| | Liberar perfil de paciente | — | — | ✓ | ✓ | | |
| | Crear usuario paciente (en liberación) | — | — | ✓ | ✓ | | |
| | Crear usuarios (otros roles) | — | — | — | ✓** | | |
| | Listado de pacientes | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | |
| | Listado de staff interno | — | — | ✓ | ✓ | | |
| | Editar perfil/archivos post-liberación | — | — | — | — | | |
| \* Enfermería solo puede subir archivos; la creación y edición de datos del perfil corresponde a médico/administrador. | |
| \*\* Solo administrador puede crear usuarios de staff; médico solo crea pacientes (en liberación). |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@PRD.md` around lines 140 - 149, The RBAC matrix and the nursing footnote
conflict: the row for Crear/editar perfil médico currently suggests nursing can
write profile data, while the note says nursing only uploads files. Update the
permission matrix and the footnote in PRD.md so the rule is unambiguous, and
ensure the wording for Crear/editar perfil médico, Liberar perfil de paciente,
and the nursing note all agree before any stories are derived.
| ``` | ||
| [Médico/Admin crea perfil médico] | ||
| ↓ | ||
| [Personal autorizado consulta / carga PDFs] | ||
| ↓ | ||
| ¿Perfil liberado? | ||
| / \ | ||
| No Sí | ||
| ↓ ↓ | ||
| [Editable] [Solo lectura] | ||
| ↓ | ||
| [Médico/Admin libera] | ||
| ↓ | ||
| [Sistema crea usuario paciente + envía correo] | ||
| ↓ | ||
| [Paciente inicia sesión y consulta su historial] | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Add an explicit language tag to the flow diagram fence.
The bare fenced block at Line 459 will trigger MD040. Mark it as text (or another explicit language) so the PRD stays lint-clean.
Suggested wording
-```
+```text📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ``` | |
| [Médico/Admin crea perfil médico] | |
| ↓ | |
| [Personal autorizado consulta / carga PDFs] | |
| ↓ | |
| ¿Perfil liberado? | |
| / \ | |
| No Sí | |
| ↓ ↓ | |
| [Editable] [Solo lectura] | |
| ↓ | |
| [Médico/Admin libera] | |
| ↓ | |
| [Sistema crea usuario paciente + envía correo] | |
| ↓ | |
| [Paciente inicia sesión y consulta su historial] | |
| ``` |
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.22.1)
[warning] 459-459: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@PRD.md` around lines 459 - 475, The flow diagram in the PRD uses a bare
fenced block, which triggers the markdown lint rule. Update the fenced diagram
block in PRD.md to use an explicit language tag such as text so the rendered
flow remains unchanged while staying lint-clean.
Source: Linters/SAST tools
| ``` | ||
| Alta de perfil → carga de PDFs → liberación → correo con credenciales → acceso del paciente | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Normalize the markdown blocks.
Several newly added snippets trip markdownlint: the plain-text fences are unlabeled, and the status callouts contain blank lines inside blockquotes. Please label the fences and remove the empty lines so the README renders cleanly.
Also applies to: 178-186, 366-367, 372-373, 425-426
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.22.1)
[warning] 70-70: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@readme.md` around lines 70 - 72, The newly added README snippets need
markdown cleanup: the code fences around the profile flow text are unlabeled,
and the status callouts have blank lines inside blockquotes. Update the affected
README sections so each fence has an appropriate language label and remove the
empty quoted lines, using the existing markdown blocks and callout snippets as
the targets to normalize.
Source: Linters/SAST tools
| | `role` | Rol del usuario (RBAC) | | ||
| | `created_at` | Fecha de creación | | ||
|
|
||
| **Reglas:** el usuario paciente se crea al **liberar** el perfil; médico solo crea pacientes; administrador crea staff. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🔒 Security & Privacy | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
Align the role matrix with the MVP contract.
Line 314 narrows the administrator to staff creation only, but Section 1.2 and the PRD still say médico/admin can liberate profiles and create patient users. Please make this rule consistent before it becomes the implementation contract.
🛠️ Suggested correction
- **Reglas:** el usuario paciente se crea al liberar el perfil; médico solo crea pacientes; administrador crea staff.
+ **Reglas:** el usuario paciente se crea al liberar el perfil; médico y administrador pueden liberar y crear pacientes; el administrador además crea staff.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| **Reglas:** el usuario paciente se crea al **liberar** el perfil; médico solo crea pacientes; administrador crea staff. | |
| **Reglas:** el usuario paciente se crea al **liberar** el perfil; médico y administrador pueden liberar y crear pacientes; el administrador además crea staff. |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@readme.md` at line 314, The role rule in the README is inconsistent with the
MVP contract because it says the administrator only creates staff, while the
PRD/Section 1.2 still allows médico/admin to liberar perfiles and create patient
users. Update the role matrix text in the README so the same permissions are
reflected everywhere, using the relevant role definitions and the “liberar
perfil” rule as the source of truth. Ensure the wording for médico, admin,
paciente, and staff creation is aligned and does not contradict the
implementation contract.
1 participant
Se realiza PRD en base al objetivo del proyecto.
Se actualiza prompts.md
Se actualiza readme.md
Summary by CodeRabbit