feat(docs): Add final technical documentation of Acualuz Platform.

[icsanabriar]

📌 Summary

This PR delivers the technical documentation after implementation of the Acualuz Platform repositories.

The documentation consolidates the project overview, product scope, service architecture, infrastructure specification, security implementation, testing strategy, data model, API specification, user stories, and MVP work tickets into a reviewable technical package. It also adds prompt-to-section traceability so reviewers can understand which documented source artifacts and prompt iterations support each section.

🎯 Why

This documentation package establishes the source-of-truth baseline of implementation work made on the developed repositories: acualuz-monitor, acualuz-tracing, acualuz-events, acualuz-visitors backend services and acualuz-frontend. It is intended to make the architecture, MVP scope, review boundaries, and downstream implementation contracts explicit for human reviewers and CodeRabbit.

📚 Documentation delivered

• 🧭 Added a project summary covering:

  • Project information and URLs.
  • Product overview, objectives, main features, and UX assumptions.
  • System architecture, component descriptions, repository structure, infrastructure, deployment, security, and testing.
  • DynamoDB data model.
  • MVP API specification with authenticated routes across the monitor service domain.

• 🧾 Added prompt mapping logs covering:

  • The most relevant prompt entries used to produce project-summary section.
  • Source artifact references for product, architecture, infrastructure, security, testing, data, API, user stories, and tickets.

🔎 Scope

This PR is documentation-only.

It does introduce runnable application code, infrastructure code, Lambda handlers, database migrations, CI/CD workflows, or AWS resources.

🗂️ Files for review

File	Purpose
readme.md	Main technical project summary and documentation delivery package(s).
prompts.md	Prompt-to-section mapping log for traceability and review context.

🤖 CodeRabbit review focus

Please review this PR with emphasis on:

• Markdown rendering and heading hierarchy.
• Table of contents anchors and internal link consistency.
• Mermaid diagram syntax and readability.
• Consistency between the project summary and the prompt mapping log.
• Consistency of MVP scope.
• Sections marked as not documented or N/A, to ensure no unsupported assumptions are introduced.
• Any duplicated, stale, contradictory, or unsupported claims.

✅ Validation

• Documentation is structured with a clear index and reviewable sections.
• Source-of-truth references are included for documented claims.
• Sections without supporting documentation are explicitly marked as not documented or N/A.
• Prompt mapping log connects summary sections to relevant source prompts and artifacts.
• Markdown links should be verified in GitHub after the PR is opened.
• Mermaid diagrams should be previewed in GitHub after the PR is opened.

🧪 Tests

Not run. This is a documentation-only PR and does not modify runtime source code, tests, infrastructure, or build pipelines.

⚠️ Risk

Low technical risk because this PR only changes documentation.

Main review risk is documentation drift: a section may reference a source artifact, diagram path, ticket, use case, or JIRA link that later changes. CodeRabbit and human reviewers should focus on traceability, link integrity, and consistency.

🚀 Follow-up work

• Finish the uncover MVP tickets on the defined scope.
• Keep the prompt mapping log updated as new project documentation is generated or refined.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated the prompt documentation to an English “Prompt Traceability Report” with fully filled, sectioned entries (prompt sources, timestamps/IDs, agent details, and relevance/excerpts).
  • Replaced the README with an English, consolidated project delivery summary, including project status/last-updated info, navigation index, installation/setup guidance, and demonstration links.
  • Expanded architecture/data-model visuals plus a detailed API route overview and improved user story and work-ticket traceability.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c76cba09-ebc9-4689-af4e-ea66b7cabe8d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0744770 and 84b13bb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• readme.md

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• readme.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Replaced Spanish documentation templates with populated English project summaries and prompt traceability content covering product details, architecture, data, APIs, user stories, tickets, pull requests, and demonstration artifacts.

Changes

Documentation consolidation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Project summary and setup readme.md	Adds project metadata, navigation, product details, feature descriptions, UX principles, and installation instructions.
Technical reference readme.md	Documents architecture, deployment, security, testing, data entities, API routes, user stories, and work tickets.
Delivery tracking and demonstration readme.md	Adds pull request history, demonstration artifacts, and footer metadata.
Prompt traceability report prompts.md	Populates seven sections with prompt sources, identifiers, agents, relevance, and summaries.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject#247: Performs similar direct documentation replacements in prompts.md and readme.md.
• LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject#257: Updates the same documentation sources with populated delivery material.
• LIDR-academy/AI4Devs-finalproject#258: Rewrites the same documentation files with English project and prompt traceability content.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly matches the documentation-only change and summarizes the main addition to the Acualuz Platform docs.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 5

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@prompts.md`:
- Line 18: Update the verbatim prompt excerpts in prompts.md, including the
referenced occurrences, to preserve each source typo while marking it with
[sic]; clearly distinguish any normalized summaries from the exact quoted text.
Cover “orchesttrate,” “appropiate,” “respository,” and “necesary” without
changing the original wording.

In `@readme.md`:
- Around line 438-447: Complete the entity description table by adding rows for
Product, SalesOrder, and MipeApplication, including each entity’s service, PK/SK
patterns, and associated use cases consistent with the diagram. Keep the stated
nine-entity count and existing six rows unchanged.
- Line 206: Update the “Bootstrapped docs/” command in readme.md to remove the
destructive rsync --delete option, preserving the existing import and validation
steps while preventing local documentation files from being removed.
- Line 60: Update the backend ticket range in the Acualuz v1 overview to match
the Work Tickets definitions, changing T-001–T-020 to T-001–T-018 while keeping
the stated count of eighteen tickets.
- Around line 189-190: Update the sequential frontend setup commands in the
installation instructions so the environment copy command works after `cd
frontend && npm ci`; change the Configure environment command to use paths
relative to the frontend working directory, while preserving the existing
environment-file guidance.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 5fd83998-af93-4cc2-8d25-7ddeb257449b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bcde5c4 and a0e8a2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• prompts.md
• readme.md

[icsanabriar]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[icsanabriar]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.