docs: update changelog + regenerate metadata for WWCND

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

Author: raifdmueller

docs/changelog.adoc

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ A chronological record of all semantic anchors added to the catalog. Community c
 * *Single Level of Abstraction Principle (SLAP)* — Kent Beck's Composed Method, codified as a Clean Code function-design rule by Robert C. Martin (proposed by https://github.com/eirikbell[@eirikbell] in https://github.com/LLM-Coding/Semantic-Anchors/issues/440[#440])
 * *Occam's Razor* — William of Ockham's parsimony principle applied to explanations, debugging and architecture rationale (proposed by https://github.com/danielschmeiss[@danielschmeiss] in https://github.com/LLM-Coding/Semantic-Anchors/issues/439[#439])
 * *Code Smells* — Kent Beck / Martin Fowler / Robert C. Martin catalogue of surface indications pointing to deeper design problems (proposed by https://github.com/ma7tz[@ma7tz] in https://github.com/LLM-Coding/Semantic-Anchors/issues/435[#435])
+* *What Would Chuck Norris Do? (WWCND)* — Tier 3 disposition-activator for direct commitment under uncertainty; originally rejected in https://github.com/LLM-Coding/Semantic-Anchors/issues/426[#426], re-proposed by https://github.com/cornelius[@cornelius] in https://github.com/LLM-Coding/Semantic-Anchors/issues/438[#438] with a 16-page empirical validation (3 models × 19 prompts × N=2 = 114 manually scored responses) that passed all four catalog criteria
 
 == 2026-04-15
 

website/public/data/anchors.json

@@ -3632,6 +3632,38 @@
     "filePath": "docs/anchors/what-qualifies-as-a-semantic-anchor.adoc",
     "tier": 3
   },
+  {
+    "id": "what-would-chuck-norris-do",
+    "title": "What Would Chuck Norris Do? (WWCND)",
+    "categories": [
+      "problem-solving"
+    ],
+    "roles": [
+      "software-developer",
+      "software-architect",
+      "team-lead",
+      "consultant"
+    ],
+    "related": [
+      "devils-advocate",
+      "kiss-principle",
+      "yagni",
+      "occams-razor"
+    ],
+    "proponents": [
+      "Ian Spector",
+      "Chuck Norris"
+    ],
+    "tags": [
+      "decisiveness",
+      "commitment",
+      "action-bias",
+      "disposition",
+      "meme-anchor"
+    ],
+    "filePath": "docs/anchors/what-would-chuck-norris-do.adoc",
+    "tier": 3
+  },
   {
     "id": "yagni",
     "title": "YAGNI (You Aren’t Gonna Need It)",

website/public/data/categories.json

@@ -131,7 +131,8 @@
       "feynman-technique",
       "five-whys",
       "morphological-box",
-      "occams-razor"
+      "occams-razor",
+      "what-would-chuck-norris-do"
     ]
   },
   {

website/public/data/metadata.json

@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
 {
-  "generatedAt": "2026-04-20T09:55:32.712Z",
+  "generatedAt": "2026-04-20T10:51:07.435Z",
   "version": "1.0.0",
   "counts": {
-    "anchors": 134,
+    "anchors": 135,
     "categories": 14,
     "roles": 13
   },
   "statistics": {
     "averageRolesPerAnchor": "3.16",
     "averageCategoriesPerAnchor": "1.01",
-    "anchorsWithTags": 94,
-    "anchorsWithRelated": 65
+    "anchorsWithTags": 95,
+    "anchorsWithRelated": 66
   }
 }

website/public/data/roles.json

@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@
       "timtowtdi",
       "wardley-mapping",
       "what-qualifies-as-a-semantic-anchor",
+      "what-would-chuck-norris-do",
       "yagni"
     ]
   },
@@ -303,6 +304,7 @@
       "vertical-slice-architecture",
       "walking-skeleton",
       "wardley-mapping",
+      "what-would-chuck-norris-do",
       "yagni"
     ]
   },
@@ -404,6 +406,7 @@
       "tracer-bullet",
       "vertical-slice-architecture",
       "walking-skeleton",
+      "what-would-chuck-norris-do",
       "yagni"
     ]
   },
@@ -459,7 +462,8 @@
       "todotxt-flavoured-markdown",
       "user-story-mapping",
       "walking-skeleton",
-      "wardley-mapping"
+      "wardley-mapping",
+      "what-would-chuck-norris-do"
     ]
   },
   {