Merge pull request #169 from LLM-Coding/copilot/add-swat-anchor-proposal

feat: Add SWOT as a semantic anchor

Author: rdmueller

docs/anchors/swot.adoc

@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+= SWOT
+:categories: strategic-planning
+:roles: product-owner, business-analyst, consultant, team-lead, software-architect
+:related: pugh-matrix, wardley-mapping, moscow
+:proponents: Albert Humphrey
+:tags: swot, strategic-planning, analysis, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats, business-analysis
+
+[%collapsible]
+====
+Full Name:: SWOT Analysis
+
+Also known as:: SWOT Matrix, TOWS Analysis
+
+[discrete]
+== *Core Concepts*:
+
+SWOT = **S**trengths / **W**eaknesses / **O**pportunities / **T**hreats
+
+Strengths:: Internal positive attributes and resources that give the subject an advantage over others
+
+Weaknesses:: Internal negative attributes or limitations that place the subject at a disadvantage relative to others
+
+Opportunities:: External factors or trends that the subject could exploit to its advantage
+
+Threats:: External factors or conditions that could cause problems or jeopardise the subject's success
+
+Internal vs. External:: Strengths and Weaknesses are internal (within control); Opportunities and Threats are external (environmental)
+
+Present vs. Future orientation:: Strengths and Weaknesses reflect the current state; Opportunities and Threats look toward future conditions
+
+TOWS variant:: Systematic derivation of strategies by cross-referencing SWOT quadrants (SO, ST, WO, WT strategies)
+
+Key Proponent:: Albert Humphrey (Stanford Research Institute, 1960s–1970s)
+
+[discrete]
+== *When to Use*:
+
+* Strategic planning for a product, project, organisation, or technology choice
+* Competitive analysis to understand market positioning
+* Evaluating an architectural or technology decision holistically
+* Team retrospectives to assess current state before planning next steps
+* Business case preparation and stakeholder communication
+
+*Related Anchors*:
+
+* <<pugh-matrix,Pugh Matrix>>
+* <<wardley-mapping,Wardley Mapping>>
+* <<moscow,MoSCoW>>
+====

docs/anchors/swot.de.adoc

@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+= SWOT
+:categories: strategic-planning
+:roles: product-owner, business-analyst, consultant, team-lead, software-architect
+:related: pugh-matrix, wardley-mapping, moscow
+:proponents: Albert Humphrey
+:tags: swot, strategic-planning, analysis, strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats, business-analysis
+
+[%collapsible]
+====
+Vollständiger Name:: SWOT-Analyse
+
+Auch bekannt als:: SWOT-Matrix, TOWS-Analyse
+
+[discrete]
+== *Kernkonzepte*:
+
+SWOT = **S**tärken / **S**chwächen / **C**hancen / **B**edrohungen (englisches Akronym: Strengths / Weaknesses / Opportunities / Threats)
+
+Strengths (Stärken):: Interne positive Eigenschaften und Ressourcen, die dem Betrachtungsobjekt einen Vorteil gegenüber anderen verschaffen
+
+Weaknesses (Schwächen):: Interne negative Eigenschaften oder Einschränkungen, die das Betrachtungsobjekt gegenüber anderen benachteiligen
+
+Opportunities (Chancen):: Externe Faktoren oder Trends, die das Betrachtungsobjekt zu seinem Vorteil nutzen könnte
+
+Threats (Risiken):: Externe Faktoren oder Bedingungen, die Probleme verursachen oder den Erfolg des Betrachtungsobjekts gefährden könnten
+
+Intern vs. Extern:: Stärken und Schwächen sind intern (beeinflussbar); Chancen und Risiken sind extern (umgebungsbedingt)
+
+Gegenwart vs. Zukunft:: Stärken und Schwächen spiegeln den aktuellen Zustand wider; Chancen und Risiken blicken auf zukünftige Bedingungen
+
+TOWS-Variante:: Systematische Ableitung von Strategien durch Kreuzvergleich der SWOT-Quadranten (SO-, ST-, WO-, WT-Strategien)
+
+Schlüsselvertreter:: Albert Humphrey (Stanford Research Institute, 1960er–1970er Jahre)
+
+[discrete]
+== *Wann zu verwenden*:
+
+* Strategische Planung für ein Produkt, Projekt, eine Organisation oder Technologieentscheidung
+* Wettbewerbsanalyse zur Bestimmung der Marktpositionierung
+* Ganzheitliche Bewertung einer Architektur- oder Technologieentscheidung
+* Team-Retrospektiven zur Zustandsbewertung vor der nächsten Planungsrunde
+* Erstellung von Business Cases und Stakeholder-Kommunikation
+
+*Verwandte Anker*:
+
+* <<pugh-matrix,Pugh-Matrix>>
+* <<wardley-mapping,Wardley Mapping>>
+* <<moscow,MoSCoW>>
+====

skill/semantic-anchor-translator/references/catalog.md

@@ -293,3 +293,7 @@ Source: https://github.com/LLM-Coding/Semantic-Anchors
 ### Pugh Matrix
 - **Proponents:** Stuart Pugh
 - **Core:** Decision matrix comparing options against criteria with baseline
+
+### SWOT
+- **Proponents:** Albert Humphrey
+- **Core:** Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats — internal vs. external strategic analysis

website/public/data/anchors.json

@@ -1994,6 +1994,39 @@
     "tags": [],
     "filePath": "docs/anchors/ssot-principle.adoc"
   },
+  {
+    "id": "swot",
+    "title": "SWOT",
+    "categories": [
+      "strategic-planning"
+    ],
+    "roles": [
+      "product-owner",
+      "business-analyst",
+      "consultant",
+      "team-lead",
+      "software-architect"
+    ],
+    "related": [
+      "pugh-matrix",
+      "wardley-mapping",
+      "moscow"
+    ],
+    "proponents": [
+      "Albert Humphrey"
+    ],
+    "tags": [
+      "swot",
+      "strategic-planning",
+      "analysis",
+      "strengths",
+      "weaknesses",
+      "opportunities",
+      "threats",
+      "business-analysis"
+    ],
+    "filePath": "docs/anchors/swot.adoc"
+  },
   {
     "id": "tdd-chicago-school",
     "title": "TDD, Chicago School",

website/public/data/categories.json

@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@
       "impact-mapping",
       "jobs-to-be-done",
       "pugh-matrix",
+      "swot",
       "wardley-mapping"
     ]
   },

website/public/data/metadata.json

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 {
-  "generatedAt": "2026-03-11T11:07:32.371Z",
+  "generatedAt": "2026-03-11T08:43:54.678Z",
   "version": "1.0.0",
   "counts": {
     "anchors": 92,

website/public/data/roles.json

@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
       "pyramid-principle",
       "regulated-environment",
       "ssot-principle",
+      "swot",
       "user-story-mapping"
     ]
   },
@@ -48,6 +49,7 @@
       "socratic-method",
       "solid-principles",
       "sota",
+      "swot",
       "timtowtdi",
       "wardley-mapping",
       "what-qualifies-as-a-semantic-anchor",
@@ -118,6 +120,7 @@
       "problem-space-nvc",
       "pugh-matrix",
       "semantic-versioning",
+      "swot",
       "user-story-mapping",
       "wardley-mapping"
     ]
@@ -202,6 +205,7 @@
       "solid-srp",
       "spot-principle",
       "ssot-principle",
+      "swot",
       "tdd-london-school",
       "timtowtdi",
       "wardley-mapping",
@@ -310,6 +314,7 @@
       "regulated-environment",
       "socratic-method",
       "spc",
+      "swot",
       "testing-pyramid",
       "todotxt-flavoured-markdown",
       "user-story-mapping",