Merge pull request #344 from raifdmueller/feat/evaluation-report-page

feat: publish evaluation report on the website

Author: rdmueller

docs/anchor-evaluations.adoc

@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ We do not know whether this holds equally across models.
 A semantic anchor that works perfectly in Claude may activate a different or shallow framework in GPT, Gemini, or an open-source model.
 Without systematic evaluation, our catalog is a collection of untested assumptions.
 
+link:../evaluation-report.html[**View the latest evaluation results →**]
+
 This document describes how to build evaluations that answer three questions:
 
 . Does a given LLM *recognize* a semantic anchor?

scripts/render-docs.js

@@ -93,6 +93,13 @@ renderFile(
   path.join(WEB_DOCS, 'spec-driven-workflow.de.html')
 )
 
+// Copy evaluation report (self-contained HTML)
+const evalReport = path.join(ROOT, 'evaluations/report.html')
+if (fs.existsSync(evalReport)) {
+  fs.copyFileSync(evalReport, path.join(WEB_PUBLIC, 'evaluation-report.html'))
+  console.log(`Copied: ${path.relative(ROOT, path.join(WEB_PUBLIC, 'evaluation-report.html'))}`)
+}
+
 // Copy assets referenced by workflow docs
 const workflowDiagram = path.join(ROOT, 'docs/workflow-diagram.png')
 if (fs.existsSync(workflowDiagram)) {