Skip to content

[Anchor Proposal]: Morphological Box (Zwicky Box) #588

Description

@raifdmueller

Proposed Term

Morphological Box (aka Zwicky Box).

⚠️ Recommended catalog name must carry "Box" / "Zwicky". The bare form "morphological analysis" is ambiguous — a strong model defaults to the linguistics meaning (see activation test).

Context

A systematic method (Fritz Zwicky, 1940s–1969) for spanning the full solution space of a multi-dimensional problem: decompose it into independent parameters, list each parameter's possible values, and form candidate solutions by choosing one value per parameter. The "box" is the complete configuration space.

It fills a real gap next to the existing Pugh Matrix anchor in the decision flow:
Morphological Box generates the option space → Pugh Matrix scores it → ADR decides.

LLM Activation Test Result

Run in a clean room (claude -p --setting-sources "" --strict-mcp-config, no project context) across three model tiers, using the new anchor-prior-test skill (PR #587).

Probe Haiku 4.5 Sonnet 4.6 Opus 4.8
Recognition / richness recognized, rich recognized, rich recognized, rich
Anchor action ("design space for a mug") parameter×value matrix ✓ + cross-consistency ✓ matrix ✓ + CCA ✓ matrix ✓ + CCA ✓
Attribution Fritz Zwicky (high) Fritz Zwicky, 1940s–1969 (high)
Bare "morphological analysis" innovation / systems eng. linguistics ⚠️

Verbatim, Opus on "what do you associate with the morphological box (Zwicky box)?":

Fritz Zwicky … Parameters / attributes / dimensions … Values / characteristics / options … Matrix / grid structure … Combinatorial generation … Solution space (the Cartesian product) … Cross-consistency assessment (CCA) … General Morphological Analysis (GMA) … creativity/ideation … engineering & product design … futures/scenario planning.

Verdict (four criteria): Precise ✓ (as "Morphological Box/Zwicky Box"), Rich ✓✓, Consistent ✓ (qualified name), Attributable ✓✓ (Fritz Zwicky). Prior density: strong — recognized + rich + works as an instruction on all tiers including the weakest. Markedly stronger than a recent-but-niche term (contrast "Use-Case 3.0", which all tiers doubted).

Suggested tier: ★★★ under the name Morphological Box (bare "morphological analysis" would be ★★☆ — needs qualification).

Pre-submission Checklist

  • I have searched existing anchors and this term is not already included
  • This term refers to a well-established concept (Fritz Zwicky, General Morphological Analysis)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions