docs: brownfield Phase 0.5 — copy-paste prompt block + hyphenate title (#472)

[raifdmueller]

Closes #472

Summary

Two changes to `docs/brownfield-workflow.adoc` Phase 0.5:

1. Display-title rename — "Socratic Code Theory Recovery" → "Socratic Code-Theory Recovery" so it parses as a compound noun (the theory of the code, Naur 1985) rather than four separate words. Slug, filenames, and the contract name in CLAUDE.md keep the old form for now; a future issue can do the full slug rename + redirect if desired.

2. Copy-paste prompt block — replaces the scattered 5-line starting-questions snippet with one self-contained AsciiDoc `[source,txt]` block (2565 chars rendered) that includes:

• the methodology name
• 5 starting questions with Q-IDs
• decomposition guides (arc42, Cockburn, ISO 25010, Nygard ADRs)
• leaf classification rules (`[ANSWERED]` with evidence vs `[OPEN]` with Category and Ask role)
• output files (`QUESTION_TREE.adoc`, `OPEN_QUESTIONS.adoc`)

A reader can now copy-and-paste the prompt 1:1 into an LLM session without assembling it from prose.

Scope

• EN only. The DE version is missing the entire Phase 0.5 section — that's Content parity: DE and EN versions of workflow pages diverge #471, which must land first before this content can be ported to German.

Test plan

• AsciiDoc renders cleanly via `scripts/render-docs.js`
• Production build (`npm run build`) succeeds
• Playwright verification against `http://localhost:4173/Semantic-Anchors/brownfield\`:
  • Section title shows "Phase 0.5: Socratic Code-Theory Recovery"
  • 2565-char prompt block present
  • Block starts with "You are performing Socratic Code-Theory Recovery on a brownfield bounded context..."
• No remaining "Socratic Code Theory" (no hyphen) in the file

Related

• Depends on no other PRs
• Blocks the German half of the same work — that needs Content parity: DE and EN versions of workflow pages diverge #471 first

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@raifdmueller has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 28 minutes and 2 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f291c9b8-92ff-4092-b76d-cedbf589e678

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5e35499 and 93fde91.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .gitignore
• docs/brownfield-workflow.adoc

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}