docs: bring DE brownfield workflow to parity with EN (#471)

[raifdmueller]

Closes #471

Summary

Brings `docs/brownfield-workflow.de.adoc` to full content parity with the English version. The DE file had only a stub "Sicherheitsnetz aufbauen" section where EN has the complete Socratic Code-Theory Recovery methodology — this PR ports the missing content.

What's translated

Phase 0.5 — Socratic Code-Theory Recovery:

• Methodology explanation (Naur 1985 reference)
• Phase 1: Question Tree aufbauen (with the same copy-paste prompt block as EN; the prompt body stays in English so LLM activation is consistent across UI languages)
• Zwischen den Phasen: Team beantwortet die offenen Fragen (with the typical-categories table)
• Phase 2: Dokumentation synthetisieren
• Basis-Tests aufbauen (moved after Phase 2 to match EN order)
• Was das LLM rekonstruieren kann — und was nicht
• Spec-Drift und Abgleich

Prompt Cheat Sheet extended with the four missing rows: `Theory Recovery (Phase 1)`, `Team Answers`, `Theory Recovery (Phase 2)`, `Reconciliation`.

Weiterführende Literatur extended with Naur, Brownfield Experiment Report, Fair Comparison Report.

Naming

The methodology name "Socratic Code-Theory Recovery" stays in English as it's a proper-noun contract name; prose around it is German.

Test plan

• DE file now 288 lines vs EN 290 (was 170 vs 238)
• Section count matches: 17 vs 17
• `scripts/render-docs.js` produces valid HTML
• `npm run build` succeeds
• DE-rendered HTML contains 4× "Socratic Code-Theory Recovery" (matching EN)
• DE-rendered HTML contains the full Phase 1 prompt block
• No remaining "Socratic Code Theory" (without hyphen) anywhere in the file

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@raifdmueller has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7fb48256-a4ee-4594-b7ae-ee30ea61ffc3

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e893dcb and 801eec0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/brownfield-workflow.de.adoc

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}