feat: add Meaningful Human Control (MHC) anchor#543
Merged
Conversation
…Coding#541, LLM-Coding#542) Adds MHC as a new semantic anchor covering human control over autonomous systems. Includes EN and DE versions. Related: LLM-Coding#540 (proposal), LLM-Coding#541 (AI Ethics category), LLM-Coding#542 (governance roles)
Contributor
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
WalkthroughDie PR fügt zwei neue AsciiDoc‑Anchors hinzu (englisch und deutsch) für den Semantic Anchor „Meaningful Human Control (MHC)“ mit Metadaten, Core Concepts, Einsatz‑/Nicht‑Einsatzfällen, Related Anchors und einer Tier‑2 Quality Criteria Checklist. ChangesMeaningful Human Control Semantic Anchor
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related issues
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/anchors/meaningful-human-control.adoc`:
- Around line 34-58: Add a new standalone section titled "Quality Criteria
Checklist" to the meaningful-human-control anchor (place it after the existing
"*Related Anchors*" block) that contains the explicit checklist items requested
in issue `#540` (e.g., measurable acceptance criteria, evidence types required,
minimum documentation/artifacts, validation methods, and Tier-2 justification
points) so the anchor’s qualification and Tier-2 justification are transparent
and auditable; ensure the section heading matches the document style (use
[discrete] and == *Quality Criteria Checklist*), list each criterion as bullet
points, and reference which checklist items map to the Tier-2 justification and
required evidence.
In `@docs/anchors/meaningful-human-control.de.adoc`:
- Line 54: The internal anchor link uses the wrong ID "cynebin-framework";
update the anchor token to the correct ID "cynefin-framework" (replace
<<cynebin-framework,Cynefin-Framework>> with
<<cynefin-framework,Cynefin-Framework>> so the internal reference resolves
correctly).
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 97079095-bbb5-477f-bcdb-fa6f8198eabf
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/anchors/meaningful-human-control.adocdocs/anchors/meaningful-human-control.de.adoc
rdmueller
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 1, 2026
Companion updates for the MHC anchor (JensGrote, #543): changelog entry crediting the proposer, AgentSkill catalog entry under Strategic Planning, and regenerated metadata JSON (anchors, categories, roles) so the anchor surfaces in the catalog grid and role filters. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
rdmueller
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 1, 2026
feat: Meaningful Human Control anchor + companion updates (supersedes #543)
rdmueller
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 1, 2026
The German MHC anchor was missing the Tier-2 Quality Criteria Checklist that the English version carries (acceptance criteria, evidence types, minimum artifacts, validation methods, tier justification). Translated to German with technical terms kept in English (HMI, Red-Team, IHL, EU AI Act, override) and Sharkey levels as S1–S5 to match the rest of the DE file. Resolves the EN/DE asymmetry noted on #543/#547. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds Meaningful Human Control (MHC) as a new semantic anchor, including both English (
meaningful-human-control.adoc) and German (meaningful-human-control.de.adoc) versions.MHC is a well-established concept originating from Article 36 (2013) and adopted across international humanitarian law (ICRC, UN CCW GGE), technical ethics standards (IEEE), AI principles (Asilomar), regulation (EU AI Act), and ethical discourse (encyclica "Magnifica Humanitas" 2026).
Related Issues
:categories: strategic-planningas placeholder until [Category Proposal]: AI Ethics & Governance #541 is resolved)systems-thinkerrole as placeholder until [Role Taxonomy Proposal]: Cross-Cutting Governance Roles #542/[Role Proposal]: Systems Thinker / Systemic Consultant #520 are resolved)Changes
docs/anchors/meaningful-human-control.adocdocs/anchors/meaningful-human-control.de.adocNotes for Reviewers
strategic-planning. Should move toai-ethics-governanceonce [Category Proposal]: AI Ethics & Governance #541 is implemented.systems-thinkeris used but not yet in the role taxonomy — tracked in [Role Proposal]: Systems Thinker / Systemic Consultant #520/[Role Taxonomy Proposal]: Cross-Cutting Governance Roles #542.Summary by CodeRabbit