docs: add adversarial review report v0.1

Author: LalaSkye

enterprise-execution-readiness/docs/adversarial-review-report-v0.1.md

@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+# Adversarial Review Report v0.1
+
+## Status
+
+**Review mode:** Red Hat / hostile-but-fair  
+**Reviewer surface:** Vector / Guac adversarial pass  
+**Scope:** Enterprise-shaped scenario harness v0.1  
+**Date:** 2026-05-12  
+**Claim rule:** Claims widen only when evidence widens.
+
+## Direct verdict
+
+**HOLD.**
+
+The enterprise-shaped scenario harness shows a clean synthetic refusal path with mock adapter and receipt generation; it does not yet prove real commit-gate-core blocking, downstream non-execution, or enterprise readiness.
+
+## One-sentence verdict
+
+The harness is a useful synthetic design and test surface, but the main evidence gap is the jump from mock/local harness to real commit-gate-core enforcement and controlled downstream non-execution.
+
+## Strongest proof
+
+The harness is runnable, deterministic, and inspectable.
+
+It currently shows:
+
+- a named action class: `SEND_EXTERNAL_EMAIL`
+- a missing authority condition: `authority_token`
+- a refusal outcome
+- a mocked downstream adapter
+- a non-call assertion: `send_call_count == 0`
+- a refusal receipt fixture
+- a synthetic trace harness
+- a CI replay surface
+
+## Weakest proof
+
+Everything remains synthetic or mocked.
+
+The refusal path does not yet prove:
+
+- live SMTP/API non-execution
+- real execution-layer routing
+- enterprise deployment
+- production enforcement
+- path-universal bypass closure
+- controlled organisational use
+- independent third-party review
+
+## Primary attack that lands
+
+> The current harness proves the mocked adapter was not called. It does not prove that a real execution boundary stops a real downstream action.
+
+## Secondary attack that lands
+
+> The artefact uses enterprise language, but the evidence remains synthetic. The wording must keep saying "enterprise-shaped" or "test scaffold," not "enterprise-ready."
+
+## Pinball Evidence Score
+
+| Token | Score | Reason |
+|---|---:|---|
+| Clear claim boundary | +1 | Boundary explicitly denies enterprise readiness, production enforcement, compliance, certification, and path-universal claims |
+| Public artefact | +1 | Public GitHub artefact |
+| Inspectable structure | +2 | README, evidence matrix, scenario, schema, receipt, tests |
+| Runnable surface | +3 | Pytest and synthetic trace harness |
+| Refusal / stop evidence | +3 | Synthetic refusal path and mocked downstream non-call |
+| Receipt / audit trail | +4 | Receipt fixture and synthetic audit event shape |
+| Replayability | +0 | CI surface exists, but persistent replay ledger not yet present |
+| External review | +0 | Red Hat report exists internally, but no external issue/review evidence yet |
+| Real-world controlled application | +0 | No bounded organisational scenario yet |
+| Production / certified / audited | +0 | Not claimed or proven |
+
+**Current score:** 14/30
+
+## Required patch path to 24–26 without widening claim
+
+1. Add persistent replay ledger and deterministic replay tests.
+2. Add adversarial review report and external review issue template.
+3. Add controlled-state execution trace scaffold using real commit-gate-core bridge and mocked downstream boundary.
+4. Add bypass tests: retry, queue, stale authority, alternate send path.
+5. Add append-only receipt log with hash chain.
+
+## Revised safe claim ceiling
+
+This artefact demonstrates a synthetic enterprise-shaped test scaffold with mocked downstream non-call proof for ESP-001.
+
+It does not prove enterprise readiness, production enforcement, live downstream non-execution, compliance, certification, adoption, or path-universal governance.
+
+## Clean line
+
+A reviewer can run the harness, inspect the mock non-call, and read the receipt. They cannot infer live runtime enforcement or enterprise readiness.