You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
During the EGU2023 conference, when I presented a high-performance MPM (Material Point Method) solver, I was asked,
9
9
"How do you discretize the computational model for the MPM?" I didn't have a clear answer (I didn't even consider it a problem) because the models were relatively simple and could be generated directly using some straightforward functions. However, as computational models gradually became more complex and diverse, I began to realize that this was indeed a very good question. The preprocessing for MPM should not be a computationally intensive task; it should be fast enough. Yet, I couldn't find a "plug-and-play" generalized code for this purpose. Some literatures have contributed to this issue, and I built upon their work to create a comprehensive and refined julia package.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/src/workflow/polygon.md
+8-4Lines changed: 8 additions & 4 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ For the second scenario, to support complex polygons in any situation, we need t
11
11
We are preparing to discretize a two-dimensional pentagon, noting that the specified distance is between the material points in both the x and y directions.
12
12
13
13
```@docs
14
-
polygon2particle(polygon, lpx, lpy)
14
+
polygon2particle(polygon::AbstractMatrix{T}, lpx, lpy) where T<:Real
0 commit comments