Added feedback on MachineKit from @cerna

Author: smoe

community/index.md

@@ -72,12 +72,13 @@ LinuxCNC](/docs/html/code/contributing-to-linuxcnc.html).
 LinuxCNC has spawned derivative projects. You may be interested to learn about what is different to LinuxCNC with
  * [OpenCN](https://gitlab.com/mecatronyx/opencnc/opencn)
    - Different trajectory planner with focus on minimal variation of force imposed on spindle
- * [MachineKit](https://www.machinekit.io/) - to mind come
+ * [MachineKit](https://www.machinekit.io/) - addresses developers
    - Trying to decouple the parts into isolated functional blocks: The focus is no longer the CNC controller, but the CNC is just one application.
-     There is - for example - the tormach/hal_ros_control for connecting to the ROS
+     There is - for example - the [hal\_ros\_control](github.com/tormach/hal_ros_control) for connecting to the [Robot Operating System](https://www.ros.org/).
    - The Machinetalk remote communication protocol
    - Different (some may say "more clear") repository structure
  * ? Contact us for what we are missing.
 
 Forks are much appreciated as a means to tailor LinuxCNC to the needs of our users.
 And forks foster steady improvements as all forks compete for eyeballs, ideas and implementations.
+