Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughTwo Astro pages were updated with content modifications. The pricing page gained a new "Webshop integration" feature with associated details including custom pricing, payment methods, and order management capabilities. The support page adjusted contributor counts, renamed one contributor, and reorganized team members between active and past contributors sections. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Areas for attention:
Poem
Pre-merge checks✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
src/pages/support.astro (1)
319-333: Fix malformedclassattribute on translation block container
<div class=\max-w-3xl ...`>uses backticks without Astro/JS interpolation, which produces an invalid/unexpectedclass` value and a bunch of stray boolean attributes instead of Tailwind classes. This likely breaks styling of the translation section.Recommend switching to a normal quoted class attribute:
- <div class=`max-w-3xl mx-auto text-center p-6 rounded-md dark:shadow-none dark:border dark:border-slate-600`> + <div class="max-w-3xl mx-auto text-center p-6 rounded-md dark:shadow-none dark:border dark:border-slate-600">
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/pages/support.astro (1)
82-123: Team member replacement looks consistent; consider handling historical entry explicitlyThe switch to
cdzombak (Chris Dzombak)with updated avatar, alt text, and roledev.is consistent with the rest of the team configuration. The commented‑outRonnieTazblock works as a temporary reminder, but long‑term it may be clearer either to remove it or to add that contributor explicitly to “Past Contributors” instead of keeping a commented object here.src/pages/get-supporter-edition.astro (1)
104-111: Webshop integration pricing item wired correctly; optional clarity on availabilityThe new “Webshop integration.” item uses the same shape as existing entries (description, icon,
classes.icon_bg/classes.icon), so it should render fine inPrices. Given the specs section marks Webshop integration asisSoon, you may optionally consider hinting at “coming soon” here as well (if it’s not yet live) to keep expectations aligned.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/pages/get-supporter-edition.astro(3 hunks)src/pages/support.astro(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/pages/support.astro (2)
42-48: Stats widget update matches visible team compositionDevs count moved to
4, which aligns with the four active team entries below. No issues from a data or layout perspective.
302-315: Past contributors additions are coherent with previous team changesAdding
ppshobiandsancsinhere as past contributors (with matching GitHub avatars and concise alt texts) cleanly reflects their move off the current team list. Data shape matches other items in the array.src/pages/get-supporter-edition.astro (2)
81-87: Combined “User groups & upload quotas” wording is clear and consistentMerging these into a single bullet better reflects the related functionality and still matches the detailed rows in the comparison table. No structural or syntax issues.
359-387: Webshop integration specs block is structurally sound and aligned with SE-only featuresThe new
Webshop integrationheader (withisSoon: true) and its detailed rows (custom pricing, basket flow, Mollie, offline payments, order admin, download links) follow the existing pattern for feature sections: one header entry plus SE-only capabilities indicated viaavailable: [false, true]. Data shapes match the rest of thespecsarray.
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.