Skip to content

SPEC_EVO14_PSY.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
69 lines (65 loc) · 3.08 KB

SPEC_EVO14_PSY.md

File metadata and controls

69 lines (65 loc) · 3.08 KB
Raw

SPEC-014-PSY: Psychologist Skill

Version: 1.0.0 | Status: draft | TDD: required

Objective

Automated psychological profiling for fictional characters using Big Five + attachment theory, defense mechanism identification (Vaillant hierarchy), and interpersonal dynamics analysis — explicitly avoiding diagnostic reductionism.

Acceptance Criteria

  • CT-1: psychological_profile() uses Big Five (OCEAN) dimensions + attachment style (secure / anxious / avoidant / disorganized) for each character
  • CT-2: Defense mechanisms identified and classified per Vaillant's hierarchy (Level I psychotic → Level IV mature)
  • CT-3: Output contains an explicit "This is not a clinical diagnosis" disclaimer; no DSM/ICD codes or clinical labels applied to fictional characters
  • CT-4: Interpersonal dynamics analyzed via dyadic compatibility (attachment pairing, OCEAN complementarity/gap analysis)

API Contract

  • Class: PsychologistEngine
  • Input: 
    {
  "characters": [
    {
      "name": "string",
      "backstory": "string",
      "behaviors": ["string"],
      "relationships": [{"with": "string", "type": "familial | romantic | rivalry | mentorship | friendship"}]
    }
  ],
  "analysis_type": "profile | dynamics | defense_mechanisms | comprehensive"
}
  • Output: 
    {
  "disclaimer": "This is a fictional character analysis for creative worldbuilding. It is not a clinical diagnosis.",
  "profiles": [
    {
      "name": "string",
      "big_five": {
        "openness": {"score": "0-100", "facets": ["string"]},
        "conscientiousness": {"score": "0-100", "facets": ["string"]},
        "extraversion": {"score": "0-100", "facets": ["string"]},
        "agreeableness": {"score": "0-100", "facets": ["string"]},
        "neuroticism": {"score": "0-100", "facets": ["string"]}
      },
      "attachment_style": "secure | anxious | avoidant | disorganized",
      "defense_mechanisms": [
        {"name": "string", "level": "I | II | III | IV", "trigger_context": "string", "adaptive_value": "maladaptive | immature | neurotic | mature"}
      ],
      "core_conflict": "string",
      "behavioral_consistency_score": "0.0-1.0"
    }
  ],
  "interpersonal_dynamics": [
    {
      "pair": ["char_a", "char_b"],
      "attachment_compatibility": "high | moderate | low | conflict_prone",
      "ocean_gaps": {"dimension": "string", "gap_size": "float", "projected_friction": "string"},
      "dynamic_pattern": "complementary | mirroring | oppositional | enmeshed | distant",
      "growth_potential": "HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW"
    }
  ]
}

Constraints

  • Mandatory disclaimer at output root — no exceptions
  • Defense mechanism classification must use Vaillant (1992) four-level hierarchy
  • Attachment style must follow Bartholomew & Horowitz (1991) four-category model
  • OCEAN facets must reference at least 2 facets per dimension (NEO-PI-R subset)
  • DSM/ICD codes, clinical diagnoses, and medicalizing language are banned from output
  • Behavioral consistency score < 0.5 must flag character as incoherently written