Skip to content

ci(pr-review): 👷 Upgrade to code-review-agent-action v3 with generic LLM provider config#68

Merged
jorben merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
feat/ci-provider-config
May 8, 2026
Merged

ci(pr-review): 👷 Upgrade to code-review-agent-action v3 with generic LLM provider config#68
jorben merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
feat/ci-provider-config

Conversation

@jorben

@jorben jorben commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Upgrade TiyAgents/code-review-agent-action from v1 to v3
  • Migrate from OpenAI-specific env vars to generic LLM provider configuration (LLM_API_KEY, LLM_PROVIDER_PROTOCOL, LLM_API_BASE, PLANNER_MODEL, DEFAULT_MODEL)
  • Add checkout step, expand allowlist, tighten confidence threshold to 0.85, and extend include/exclude patterns

Test Plan

  • Verify workflow triggers correctly on next PR
  • Confirm new secrets/variables are configured in repo settings

🤖 Generated with TiyCode

Replace OpenAI-specific configuration with a generic LLM provider setup, enabling support for multiple AI backends (e.g., OpenAI, OpenRouter, Tencent Cloud). Environment variables and inputs are now provider-agnostic, with new fields for API base URL, model names, and expanded allowlist hosts. Configuration defaults and exclusions are updated for broader compatibility.
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

AI Code Review Summary

PR: #68 (ci(pr-review): 👷 Upgrade to code-review-agent-action v3 with generic LLM provider config)
Preferred language: English

Overall Assessment

No blocking issue was detected in the reviewed diff; keep focused regression testing before merge.

Major Findings by Severity

No major issues identified from the reviewed diff.

Actionable Suggestions

  • Address the highest severity findings first and add targeted tests for changed logic.

Potential Risks

  • Potential hidden risks remain in edge cases not covered by the current diff context.

Test Suggestions

  • Add happy-path + boundary + failure-path tests for touched modules.

File-Level Coverage Notes

No file-level notes.

Inline Downgraded Items (processed but not inline)

  • None

Coverage Status

  • Target files: 0
  • Covered files: 0
  • Uncovered files: 0
  • No-patch/binary covered as file-level: 0
  • Findings with unknown confidence (N/A): 0

Uncovered list:

  • None

No-patch covered list:

  • None

Runtime/Budget

  • Rounds used: 0/4
  • Planned batches: 0
  • Executed batches: 0
  • Sub-agent runs: 0
  • Planner calls: 0
  • Reviewer calls: 0
  • Model calls: 0/64
  • Structured-output summary-only degradation: NO

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated PR review completed.

  • Findings kept: 0
  • Findings with unknown confidence: 0
  • Inline comments attempted: 0
  • Target files: 0
  • Covered files: 0
  • Uncovered files: 0
    See the summary comment for detailed analysis and coverage details.

@jorben
jorben merged commit 2a815ec into master May 8, 2026
3 checks passed
@jorben
jorben deleted the feat/ci-provider-config branch May 8, 2026 07:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant