chore(plotnine): update quality score 81 and review feedback for column-stratigraphic

Author: github-actions[bot]

plots/column-stratigraphic/implementations/plotnine.py

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-"""pyplots.ai
+""" pyplots.ai
 column-stratigraphic: Stratigraphic Column with Lithology Patterns
-Library: plotnine | Python 3.13
-Quality: pending | Created: 2026-03-15
+Library: plotnine 0.15.3 | Python 3.14.3
+Quality: 81/100 | Created: 2026-03-15
 """
 
 import numpy as np

plots/column-stratigraphic/metadata/plotnine.yaml

@@ -1,10 +1,7 @@
-# Per-library metadata for plotnine implementation of column-stratigraphic
-# Auto-generated by impl-generate.yml
-
 library: plotnine
 specification_id: column-stratigraphic
 created: '2026-03-15T22:55:35Z'
-updated: '2026-03-15T22:55:35Z'
+updated: '2026-03-15T22:59:31Z'
 generated_by: claude-opus-4-5-20251101
 workflow_run: 23121198926
 issue: 4573
@@ -13,7 +10,210 @@ library_version: 0.15.3
 preview_url: https://storage.googleapis.com/pyplots-images/plots/column-stratigraphic/plotnine/plot.png
 preview_thumb: https://storage.googleapis.com/pyplots-images/plots/column-stratigraphic/plotnine/plot_thumb.png
 preview_html: null
-quality_score: null
+quality_score: 81
 review:
-  strengths: []
-  weaknesses: []
+  strengths:
+  - Excellent spec compliance with all required features and correct layout conventions
+  - Realistic geological data using actual Western US formation names
+  - Good variety of lithology patterns approximating standard geological symbols
+  - Well-structured plotnine layer composition with clean theme customization
+  weaknesses:
+  - Formation and age label font sizes too small (10-11pt)
+  - Siltstone pattern too sparse and hard to distinguish
+  - Color contrast between siltstone and shale insufficient
+  - No visual emphasis or focal point for data storytelling
+  - Title at 22pt slightly under 24pt guideline
+  image_description: 'The plot displays a vertical stratigraphic column spanning 0-180m
+    depth with 10 geological layers. Each layer is filled with a distinct muted color
+    and overlaid with lithology-specific patterns: sandstone (yellow with stipple
+    dots), shale (gray with horizontal dashes), limestone (blue with brick pattern),
+    siltstone (light blue-gray with short random dashes), conglomerate (salmon with
+    open circles), and mudstone (brown with dense horizontal dashes). Age labels (Late
+    Cretaceous through Triassic) appear on the left side, and formation names (Frontier
+    Fm, Madison Fm, Kootenai Fm, Morrison Fm, Sundance Fm) in italics on the right.
+    The y-axis shows "Depth (m)" increasing downward with ticks every 20m. A horizontal
+    legend at the bottom identifies all 6 lithology types. The title reads "column-stratigraphic
+    · plotnine · pyplots.ai" in bold at the top. Background is white with subtle horizontal
+    grid lines.'
+  criteria_checklist:
+    visual_quality:
+      score: 25
+      max: 30
+      items:
+      - id: VQ-01
+        name: Text Legibility
+        score: 6
+        max: 8
+        passed: true
+        comment: Font sizes explicitly set but title slightly under 24pt; formation/age
+          labels (10-11pt) are small
+      - id: VQ-02
+        name: No Overlap
+        score: 6
+        max: 6
+        passed: true
+        comment: All text well-spaced with no collisions
+      - id: VQ-03
+        name: Element Visibility
+        score: 5
+        max: 6
+        passed: true
+        comment: Most patterns visible; siltstone pattern sparse and hard to distinguish
+      - id: VQ-04
+        name: Color Accessibility
+        score: 3
+        max: 4
+        passed: true
+        comment: Generally distinguishable but siltstone and shale too similar in
+          lightness
+      - id: VQ-05
+        name: Layout & Canvas
+        score: 3
+        max: 4
+        passed: true
+        comment: Good vertical utilization; some horizontal space underutilized
+      - id: VQ-06
+        name: Axis Labels & Title
+        score: 2
+        max: 2
+        passed: true
+        comment: Y-axis shows Depth (m) with units; x-axis appropriately blank
+    design_excellence:
+      score: 12
+      max: 20
+      items:
+      - id: DE-01
+        name: Aesthetic Sophistication
+        score: 5
+        max: 8
+        passed: true
+        comment: Custom geological palette with muted tones, pattern overlays, italic
+          labels — above defaults but not publication-level
+      - id: DE-02
+        name: Visual Refinement
+        score: 4
+        max: 6
+        passed: true
+        comment: theme_minimal, removed x-axis, subtle grid — good refinement
+      - id: DE-03
+        name: Data Storytelling
+        score: 3
+        max: 6
+        passed: true
+        comment: Natural geological narrative but no focal point or emphasis
+    spec_compliance:
+      score: 15
+      max: 15
+      items:
+      - id: SC-01
+        name: Plot Type
+        score: 5
+        max: 5
+        passed: true
+        comment: Correct vertical stratigraphic column with stacked layers
+      - id: SC-02
+        name: Required Features
+        score: 4
+        max: 4
+        passed: true
+        comment: 'All required features present: 6 lithology patterns, formation/age
+          labels, depth scale, boundaries'
+      - id: SC-03
+        name: Data Mapping
+        score: 3
+        max: 3
+        passed: true
+        comment: Depth correctly mapped increasing downward
+      - id: SC-04
+        name: Title & Legend
+        score: 3
+        max: 3
+        passed: true
+        comment: Title format correct, legend labels match data
+    data_quality:
+      score: 14
+      max: 15
+      items:
+      - id: DQ-01
+        name: Feature Coverage
+        score: 5
+        max: 6
+        passed: true
+        comment: 6 lithology types, varying thicknesses, 5 formations and ages; could
+          include unconformity
+      - id: DQ-02
+        name: Realistic Context
+        score: 5
+        max: 5
+        passed: true
+        comment: Real Western US formation names with plausible age assignments
+      - id: DQ-03
+        name: Appropriate Scale
+        score: 4
+        max: 4
+        passed: true
+        comment: 0-180m depth with 12-25m thicknesses is realistic
+    code_quality:
+      score: 9
+      max: 10
+      items:
+      - id: CQ-01
+        name: KISS Structure
+        score: 3
+        max: 3
+        passed: true
+        comment: Linear flow, no functions/classes
+      - id: CQ-02
+        name: Reproducibility
+        score: 2
+        max: 2
+        passed: true
+        comment: np.random.seed(42) set
+      - id: CQ-03
+        name: Clean Imports
+        score: 2
+        max: 2
+        passed: true
+        comment: All imports used
+      - id: CQ-04
+        name: Code Elegance
+        score: 1
+        max: 2
+        passed: true
+        comment: Pattern generation loop somewhat verbose but necessary
+      - id: CQ-05
+        name: Output & API
+        score: 1
+        max: 1
+        passed: true
+        comment: Saves as plot.png with dpi=300
+    library_mastery:
+      score: 6
+      max: 10
+      items:
+      - id: LM-01
+        name: Idiomatic Usage
+        score: 4
+        max: 5
+        passed: true
+        comment: Good grammar-of-graphics usage with layered geoms, scales, and themes
+      - id: LM-02
+        name: Distinctive Features
+        score: 2
+        max: 5
+        passed: true
+        comment: Layer composition is nice but complexity is in manual data prep,
+          not plotnine features
+  verdict: REJECTED
+impl_tags:
+  dependencies: []
+  techniques:
+  - annotations
+  - layer-composition
+  patterns:
+  - data-generation
+  - iteration-over-groups
+  dataprep: []
+  styling:
+  - alpha-blending
+  - grid-styling