You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
- Could leverage more Plotly interactivity features like custom hover templates
32
-
image_description: The plot displays a donut chart with 6 budget allocation categories
33
-
rendered as colored ring segments. The largest segment is Engineering (35%) in
34
-
Python blue (#306998), followed by Marketing (20%) in yellow, Operations (15%)
35
-
in teal, Sales (15%) in coral/salmon, R&D (10%) in green, and HR (5%) in orange.
36
-
Each segment has a slight pull/explosion effect and white borders between segments.
37
-
Labels with category names and percentages are positioned outside the ring. The
38
-
center contains "Total $100M" in blue text. A vertical legend on the right lists
39
-
all categories. The title "donut-basic · plotly · pyplots.ai" appears at the top
40
-
center.
29
+
- 'Design excellence falls short of 90: the dominant Engineering segment (42%) gets
30
+
no visual emphasis — a subtle pull or highlight would guide the eye and lift DE-01
31
+
to 6+'
32
+
- Three small segments on the right (Operations 10%, R&D 6%, G&A 4%) have labels
33
+
that crowd together; auto-margin helps but spacing could be improved
34
+
- White segment separator lines are not theme-adaptive — on the dark render they
35
+
appear as fixed white rather than matching the surface color
36
+
image_description: |-
37
+
Light render (plot-light.png):
38
+
Background: Warm off-white #FAF8F1 — correct light surface color, not pure white.
39
+
Chrome: Title "donut-basic · plotly · anyplot.ai" in dark #1A1A17 text, clearly readable. Outside segment labels (category + %) in dark ink, all readable. Center annotations in three tones: "Total Budget" in muted #4A4A44, "$100M" bold in primary #1A1A17, "FY2026" in tertiary #6B6A63.
40
+
Data: Six Okabe-Ito segments — Engineering (42%) #009E73, Sales (24%) #D55E00, Marketing (14%) #0072B2, Operations (10%) #CC79A7, R&D (6%) #E69F00, G&A (4%) #56B4E9. White separator lines between segments. No legend.
41
+
Legibility verdict: PASS — all text clearly readable against warm off-white background.
42
+
43
+
Dark render (plot-dark.png):
44
+
Background: Near-black #1A1A17 — correct dark surface color, not pure black.
45
+
Chrome: Title in light text, clearly readable against dark background. Segment labels appear in light-colored text. Center annotations visible in appropriately adapted light tones. No dark-on-dark text failures.
46
+
Data: Identical six Okabe-Ito colors to light render — #009E73, #D55E00, #0072B2, #CC79A7, #E69F00, #56B4E9 — all clearly visible on the dark background. White separator lines visible (slightly harsh on dark, could be theme-adaptive).
47
+
Legibility verdict: PASS — all text readable; no dark-on-dark issues detected.
41
48
criteria_checklist:
42
49
visual_quality:
43
-
score: 36
44
-
max: 40
50
+
score: 29
51
+
max: 30
45
52
items:
46
53
- id: VQ-01
47
54
name: Text Legibility
48
-
score: 10
49
-
max: 10
55
+
score: 8
56
+
max: 8
50
57
passed: true
51
-
comment: Title at 32pt, labels at 20pt, center annotation at 36pt - all clearly
52
-
readable
58
+
comment: 'All font sizes explicitly set: title 28px, center annotations 56/22/18px,
59
+
segment labels 18px. Readable in both themes.'
53
60
- id: VQ-02
54
61
name: No Overlap
55
-
score: 8
56
-
max: 8
62
+
score: 5
63
+
max: 6
57
64
passed: true
58
-
comment: All labels positioned outside the ring with no overlapping text
65
+
comment: Mostly clean; three small right-side segments (Operations, R&D, G&A)
66
+
have labels that crowd together without true overlap.
59
67
- id: VQ-03
60
68
name: Element Visibility
61
-
score: 8
62
-
max: 8
69
+
score: 6
70
+
max: 6
63
71
passed: true
64
-
comment: Ring segments are well-sized with good thickness (hole=0.5), slight
65
-
pull effect adds visual separation
72
+
comment: Ring width (hole=0.58) is thick and well-proportioned; all six segments
73
+
including 4% G&A slice clearly visible.
66
74
- id: VQ-04
67
75
name: Color Accessibility
68
-
score: 5
69
-
max: 5
76
+
score: 2
77
+
max: 2
70
78
passed: true
71
-
comment: Uses colorblind-safe palette with distinct hues (blue, yellow, teal,
72
-
coral, green, orange)
79
+
comment: Okabe-Ito palette used, inherently CVD-safe; white segment dividers
80
+
add further differentiation.
73
81
- id: VQ-05
74
-
name: Layout Balance
75
-
score: 3
76
-
max: 5
82
+
name: Layout & Canvas
83
+
score: 4
84
+
max: 4
85
+
passed: true
86
+
comment: Donut fills ~65% of canvas, well-centered, generous equal margins
87
+
on all sides.
88
+
- id: VQ-06
89
+
name: Axis Labels & Title
90
+
score: 2
91
+
max: 2
77
92
passed: true
78
-
comment: Good overall but the legend positioned far right creates some asymmetry
93
+
comment: Title in correct format; no axes applicable to donut chart.
79
94
- id: VQ-07
80
-
name: Grid & Legend
95
+
name: Palette Compliance
81
96
score: 2
82
97
max: 2
83
98
passed: true
84
-
comment: Legend well-placed, no grid needed for donut charts
99
+
comment: 'First series #009E73, full Okabe-Ito canonical order, #FAF8F1 light
100
+
bg, #1A1A17 dark bg, theme-adaptive chrome all correct.'
101
+
design_excellence:
102
+
score: 13
103
+
max: 20
104
+
items:
105
+
- id: DE-01
106
+
name: Aesthetic Sophistication
107
+
score: 5
108
+
max: 8
109
+
passed: true
110
+
comment: Custom font (Inter), no legend, three-level center annotation with
111
+
size hierarchy — clearly above defaults but lacks focal-point emphasis on
112
+
dominant segment.
113
+
- id: DE-02
114
+
name: Visual Refinement
115
+
score: 4
116
+
max: 6
117
+
passed: true
118
+
comment: No legend, white segment dividers, generous margins, appropriate
119
+
absence of grid/spines. Some intentional refinement but separator colors
120
+
not theme-adaptive.
121
+
- id: DE-03
122
+
name: Data Storytelling
123
+
score: 4
124
+
max: 6
125
+
passed: true
126
+
comment: Center annotation creates focal point; Engineering's 42% arc naturally
127
+
dominant. Could be stronger with explicit pull on Engineering segment.
85
128
spec_compliance:
86
-
score: 25
87
-
max: 25
129
+
score: 15
130
+
max: 15
88
131
items:
89
132
- id: SC-01
90
133
name: Plot Type
91
-
score: 8
92
-
max: 8
93
-
passed: true
94
-
comment: Correct donut chart with hollow center
95
-
- id: SC-02
96
-
name: Data Mapping
97
134
score: 5
98
135
max: 5
99
136
passed: true
100
-
comment: Categories and values correctly mapped to segments
101
-
- id: SC-03
137
+
comment: Correct donut chart via go.Pie(hole=0.58).
138
+
- id: SC-02
102
139
name: Required Features
103
-
score: 5
104
-
max: 5
140
+
score: 4
141
+
max: 4
105
142
passed: true
106
-
comment: Has percentage labels, center metric ($100M total), consistent ordering
107
-
- id: SC-04
108
-
name: Data Range
143
+
comment: Center annotation, percentage labels, consistent ordering (sort=False),
144
+
thick ring width all present.
145
+
- id: SC-03
146
+
name: Data Mapping
109
147
score: 3
110
148
max: 3
111
149
passed: true
112
-
comment: All segments visible, no data cut off
113
-
- id: SC-05
114
-
name: Legend Accuracy
115
-
score: 2
116
-
max: 2
117
-
passed: true
118
-
comment: Legend labels match segment categories
119
-
- id: SC-06
120
-
name: Title Format
121
-
score: 2
122
-
max: 2
150
+
comment: Categories to labels, values to segment sizes; all data visible.
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?v=4&size=40){kind=avatar}
0 commit comments