1- # Per-library metadata for letsplot implementation of column-stratigraphic
2- # Auto-generated by impl-generate.yml
3-
41library : letsplot
52specification_id : column-stratigraphic
63created : ' 2026-03-15T23:02:48Z'
7- updated : ' 2026-03-15T23:02:48Z '
4+ updated : ' 2026-03-15T23:07:20Z '
85generated_by : claude-opus-4-5-20251101
96workflow_run : 23121198898
107issue : 4573
@@ -13,7 +10,225 @@ library_version: 4.9.0
1310preview_url : https://storage.googleapis.com/pyplots-images/plots/column-stratigraphic/letsplot/plot.png
1411preview_thumb : https://storage.googleapis.com/pyplots-images/plots/column-stratigraphic/letsplot/plot_thumb.png
1512preview_html : https://storage.googleapis.com/pyplots-images/plots/column-stratigraphic/letsplot/plot.html
16- quality_score : null
13+ quality_score : 80
1714review :
18- strengths : []
19- weaknesses : []
15+ strengths :
16+ - Excellent geological data with realistic formation names, ages, and stratigraphic
17+ sequence
18+ - Custom earthy color palette appropriate for geological visualization
19+ - Good use of lets-plot interactive tooltips (layer_tooltips) showing depth, thickness,
20+ formation, and age on hover
21+ - Clean code structure with deterministic data and proper file management
22+ - Age boundary dashed lines effectively separate geological periods
23+ weaknesses :
24+ - Missing lithology fill patterns (hatching/textures) which is a key spec requirement
25+ - Canvas utilization could be improved - the column is narrow relative to total
26+ canvas width
27+ - Sandstone and Siltstone colors are similar, potentially hard to distinguish
28+ - geom_text font size (10) is slightly small for formation and age labels
29+ image_description : ' The plot shows a vertical stratigraphic column with 10 geological
30+ layers stacked from 0m to 260m depth (increasing downward). Each layer is a colored
31+ rectangle with black borders: Sandstone in yellow/gold, Shale in gray, Limestone
32+ in blue, Siltstone in tan/beige, and Conglomerate in coral/red. Formation names
33+ (e.g., "Basal Sand Fm", "Reef Limestone Fm") are labeled to the right of each
34+ layer. Geological age labels (Triassic, Jurassic, Cretaceous, Paleogene) appear
35+ on the left side. Dashed horizontal lines mark age boundaries at 35m, 110m, and
36+ 195m. The y-axis reads "Depth (m)" and the x-axis is hidden. A horizontal legend
37+ at the bottom shows all 5 lithology types. Title reads "column-stratigraphic ·
38+ letsplot · pyplots.ai". The overall layout is clean with a minimal theme, subtle
39+ y-grid, and generous whitespace, though the column occupies only a moderate portion
40+ of the canvas width.'
41+ criteria_checklist :
42+ visual_quality :
43+ score : 25
44+ max : 30
45+ items :
46+ - id : VQ-01
47+ name : Text Legibility
48+ score : 7
49+ max : 8
50+ passed : true
51+ comment : Font sizes explicitly set (title=24, axis_title=20, ticks=16, legend=14-16).
52+ geom_text size=10 slightly small for labels at full resolution.
53+ - id : VQ-02
54+ name : No Overlap
55+ score : 6
56+ max : 6
57+ passed : true
58+ comment : All text fully readable, no collisions between formation names, age
59+ labels, or layer boundaries.
60+ - id : VQ-03
61+ name : Element Visibility
62+ score : 5
63+ max : 6
64+ passed : true
65+ comment : Rectangles clearly visible with solid black borders. Lack of fill
66+ patterns slightly reduces distinguishability.
67+ - id : VQ-04
68+ name : Color Accessibility
69+ score : 3
70+ max : 4
71+ passed : true
72+ comment : Five distinct colors but Sandstone and Siltstone are somewhat similar
73+ in lightness/warmth.
74+ - id : VQ-05
75+ name : Layout & Canvas
76+ score : 2
77+ max : 4
78+ passed : true
79+ comment : Column is relatively narrow, leaving significant whitespace on both
80+ sides. Data fills ~35-40% of canvas width.
81+ - id : VQ-06
82+ name : Axis Labels & Title
83+ score : 2
84+ max : 2
85+ passed : true
86+ comment : Y-axis labeled Depth (m) with units. X-axis appropriately hidden.
87+ design_excellence :
88+ score : 11
89+ max : 20
90+ items :
91+ - id : DE-01
92+ name : Aesthetic Sophistication
93+ score : 5
94+ max : 8
95+ passed : true
96+ comment : Custom earthy geological color palette is thoughtful. Above defaults
97+ but not publication-level.
98+ - id : DE-02
99+ name : Visual Refinement
100+ score : 3
101+ max : 6
102+ passed : true
103+ comment : theme_minimal, x-axis removed, subtle y-grid, dashed age boundaries.
104+ Some refinement visible.
105+ - id : DE-03
106+ name : Data Storytelling
107+ score : 3
108+ max : 6
109+ passed : true
110+ comment : Age groupings with dashed boundaries create temporal narrative. No
111+ visual emphasis on key features.
112+ spec_compliance :
113+ score : 13
114+ max : 15
115+ items :
116+ - id : SC-01
117+ name : Plot Type
118+ score : 5
119+ max : 5
120+ passed : true
121+ comment : ' Correct chart type: vertical stratigraphic column with stacked rectangular
122+ blocks, depth increasing downward.'
123+ - id : SC-02
124+ name : Required Features
125+ score : 2
126+ max : 4
127+ passed : false
128+ comment : Missing lithology patterns/hatching which spec explicitly requires.
129+ No wavy unconformity lines.
130+ - id : SC-03
131+ name : Data Mapping
132+ score : 3
133+ max : 3
134+ passed : true
135+ comment : Depth correctly on y-axis (reversed), layers properly mapped.
136+ - id : SC-04
137+ name : Title & Legend
138+ score : 3
139+ max : 3
140+ passed : true
141+ comment : Title format correct. Legend shows all 5 lithology types with correct
142+ labels.
143+ data_quality :
144+ score : 14
145+ max : 15
146+ items :
147+ - id : DQ-01
148+ name : Feature Coverage
149+ score : 5
150+ max : 6
151+ passed : true
152+ comment : 10 layers, 5 lithology types, varying thicknesses, 4 geological periods.
153+ No unconformity demonstrated.
154+ - id : DQ-02
155+ name : Realistic Context
156+ score : 5
157+ max : 5
158+ passed : true
159+ comment : Realistic formation names, plausible sedimentary sequence, appropriate
160+ stratigraphic terminology.
161+ - id : DQ-03
162+ name : Appropriate Scale
163+ score : 4
164+ max : 4
165+ passed : true
166+ comment : 0-260m depth range realistic for a borehole. Layer thicknesses geologically
167+ plausible.
168+ code_quality :
169+ score : 10
170+ max : 10
171+ items :
172+ - id : CQ-01
173+ name : KISS Structure
174+ score : 3
175+ max : 3
176+ passed : true
177+ comment : Clean imports-data-plot-save structure. No functions or classes.
178+ - id : CQ-02
179+ name : Reproducibility
180+ score : 2
181+ max : 2
182+ passed : true
183+ comment : Fully deterministic with hardcoded data.
184+ - id : CQ-03
185+ name : Clean Imports
186+ score : 2
187+ max : 2
188+ passed : true
189+ comment : All imports used.
190+ - id : CQ-04
191+ name : Code Elegance
192+ score : 2
193+ max : 2
194+ passed : true
195+ comment : Clean and appropriate complexity.
196+ - id : CQ-05
197+ name : Output & API
198+ score : 1
199+ max : 1
200+ passed : true
201+ comment : Saves as plot.png with scale=3. Uses current API.
202+ library_mastery :
203+ score : 7
204+ max : 10
205+ items :
206+ - id : LM-01
207+ name : Idiomatic Usage
208+ score : 4
209+ max : 5
210+ passed : true
211+ comment : ' Good use of ggplot grammar: geom_rect, geom_segment, geom_text,
212+ scale_fill_manual, scale_y_reverse.'
213+ - id : LM-02
214+ name : Distinctive Features
215+ score : 3
216+ max : 5
217+ passed : true
218+ comment : Uses layer_tooltips() which is a lets-plot distinctive interactive
219+ feature. HTML export also provided.
220+ verdict : REJECTED
221+ impl_tags :
222+ dependencies : []
223+ techniques :
224+ - annotations
225+ - layer-composition
226+ - hover-tooltips
227+ - html-export
228+ patterns :
229+ - data-generation
230+ - iteration-over-groups
231+ dataprep : []
232+ styling :
233+ - grid-styling
234+ - alpha-blending
0 commit comments