Skip to content

Commit a9a45d1

Browse files
chore(letsplot): update quality score 85 and review feedback for line-retention-cohort
1 parent 690a98b commit a9a45d1

2 files changed

Lines changed: 213 additions & 10 deletions

File tree

plots/line-retention-cohort/implementations/letsplot.py

Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
1-
"""pyplots.ai
1+
""" pyplots.ai
22
line-retention-cohort: User Retention Curve by Cohort
3-
Library: letsplot | Python 3.13
4-
Quality: pending | Created: 2026-03-16
3+
Library: letsplot 4.9.0 | Python 3.14.3
4+
Quality: 85/100 | Created: 2026-03-16
55
"""
66

77
import numpy as np
Lines changed: 210 additions & 7 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,10 +1,7 @@
1-
# Per-library metadata for letsplot implementation of line-retention-cohort
2-
# Auto-generated by impl-generate.yml
3-
41
library: letsplot
52
specification_id: line-retention-cohort
63
created: '2026-03-16T20:44:20Z'
7-
updated: '2026-03-16T20:44:20Z'
4+
updated: '2026-03-16T20:48:18Z'
85
generated_by: claude-opus-4-5-20251101
96
workflow_run: 23164943466
107
issue: 4572
@@ -13,7 +10,213 @@ library_version: 4.9.0
1310
preview_url: https://storage.googleapis.com/pyplots-images/plots/line-retention-cohort/letsplot/plot.png
1411
preview_thumb: https://storage.googleapis.com/pyplots-images/plots/line-retention-cohort/letsplot/plot_thumb.png
1512
preview_html: https://storage.googleapis.com/pyplots-images/plots/line-retention-cohort/letsplot/plot.html
16-
quality_score: null
13+
quality_score: 85
1714
review:
18-
strengths: []
19-
weaknesses: []
15+
strengths:
16+
- Perfect spec compliance — all required features present including reference line,
17+
cohort sizes in legend, and lighter colors for older cohorts
18+
- Effective data storytelling through monochromatic color gradient that naturally
19+
conveys temporal ordering
20+
- Clean, well-structured code following KISS principles with proper reproducibility
21+
weaknesses:
22+
- Monochromatic blue palette makes it harder to distinguish individual cohorts —
23+
especially the middle three lines
24+
- Library mastery does not leverage letsplot-specific interactive features (tooltips
25+
for HTML output, geom_text for endpoint labels)
26+
- Could push design further with endpoint value annotations or a more varied colorblind-friendly
27+
palette
28+
image_description: The plot displays 5 retention curves (Jan–May 2025) on a clean
29+
minimal background. Lines use a monochromatic blue palette graduating from light
30+
blue (Jan 2025, oldest) to dark navy (May 2025, newest). All curves start at 100%
31+
at week 0 and decay over 12 weeks, with newer cohorts retaining better. Points
32+
are marked on each line. A horizontal gray dashed reference line sits at 20%.
33+
The title reads "line-retention-cohort · letsplot · pyplots.ai" centered at top.
34+
X-axis is labeled "Weeks Since Signup" (0–12, even ticks), Y-axis "Retained Users
35+
(%)" (0–100, gridlines at 20% intervals). Legend on the right shows cohort names
36+
with sample sizes (e.g., "Jan 2025 (n=1,245)"). Subtle gray major gridlines, no
37+
minor gridlines. Overall layout is well-proportioned with good canvas utilization.
38+
criteria_checklist:
39+
visual_quality:
40+
score: 27
41+
max: 30
42+
items:
43+
- id: VQ-01
44+
name: Text Legibility
45+
score: 7
46+
max: 8
47+
passed: true
48+
comment: All font sizes explicitly set (title=28, axis_title=22, axis_text=18,
49+
legend=16), all clearly readable
50+
- id: VQ-02
51+
name: No Overlap
52+
score: 6
53+
max: 6
54+
passed: true
55+
comment: No overlapping elements anywhere
56+
- id: VQ-03
57+
name: Element Visibility
58+
score: 5
59+
max: 6
60+
passed: true
61+
comment: Lines and points well-visible; some convergence in similar blue shades
62+
- id: VQ-04
63+
name: Color Accessibility
64+
score: 3
65+
max: 4
66+
passed: true
67+
comment: Monochromatic blue palette distinguishable by lightness but not ideal
68+
for all viewers
69+
- id: VQ-05
70+
name: Layout & Canvas
71+
score: 4
72+
max: 4
73+
passed: true
74+
comment: Excellent proportions, plot fills canvas well
75+
- id: VQ-06
76+
name: Axis Labels & Title
77+
score: 2
78+
max: 2
79+
passed: true
80+
comment: Descriptive labels with units
81+
design_excellence:
82+
score: 13
83+
max: 20
84+
items:
85+
- id: DE-01
86+
name: Aesthetic Sophistication
87+
score: 5
88+
max: 8
89+
passed: true
90+
comment: Custom monochromatic blue palette with intentional gradient; above
91+
defaults but not publication-level
92+
- id: DE-02
93+
name: Visual Refinement
94+
score: 4
95+
max: 6
96+
passed: true
97+
comment: theme_minimal, subtle grid, minor grid removed, legend title blank
98+
- id: DE-03
99+
name: Data Storytelling
100+
score: 4
101+
max: 6
102+
passed: true
103+
comment: Color gradient guides viewer to improving retention trend; 20% threshold
104+
adds benchmark context
105+
spec_compliance:
106+
score: 15
107+
max: 15
108+
items:
109+
- id: SC-01
110+
name: Plot Type
111+
score: 5
112+
max: 5
113+
passed: true
114+
comment: Correct line chart with multiple cohort curves
115+
- id: SC-02
116+
name: Required Features
117+
score: 4
118+
max: 4
119+
passed: true
120+
comment: 'All spec features present: 100% start, distinct colors, legend with
121+
sizes, gridlines, reference line'
122+
- id: SC-03
123+
name: Data Mapping
124+
score: 3
125+
max: 3
126+
passed: true
127+
comment: X=weeks since signup, Y=retention percentage
128+
- id: SC-04
129+
name: Title & Legend
130+
score: 3
131+
max: 3
132+
passed: true
133+
comment: Title format correct, legend labels match spec format
134+
data_quality:
135+
score: 14
136+
max: 15
137+
items:
138+
- id: DQ-01
139+
name: Feature Coverage
140+
score: 5
141+
max: 6
142+
passed: true
143+
comment: 5 cohorts with varying decay rates; could show more varied curve
144+
shapes
145+
- id: DQ-02
146+
name: Realistic Context
147+
score: 5
148+
max: 5
149+
passed: true
150+
comment: Monthly signup cohorts with realistic user counts, standard product
151+
analytics scenario
152+
- id: DQ-03
153+
name: Appropriate Scale
154+
score: 4
155+
max: 4
156+
passed: true
157+
comment: Realistic exponential decay, plausible cohort sizes, industry-standard
158+
tracking window
159+
code_quality:
160+
score: 10
161+
max: 10
162+
items:
163+
- id: CQ-01
164+
name: KISS Structure
165+
score: 3
166+
max: 3
167+
passed: true
168+
comment: Clean imports-data-plot-save flow
169+
- id: CQ-02
170+
name: Reproducibility
171+
score: 2
172+
max: 2
173+
passed: true
174+
comment: np.random.seed(42) set
175+
- id: CQ-03
176+
name: Clean Imports
177+
score: 2
178+
max: 2
179+
passed: true
180+
comment: All imports used
181+
- id: CQ-04
182+
name: Code Elegance
183+
score: 2
184+
max: 2
185+
passed: true
186+
comment: Clean, appropriate complexity
187+
- id: CQ-05
188+
name: Output & API
189+
score: 1
190+
max: 1
191+
passed: true
192+
comment: Saves as plot.png with ggsave, current API
193+
library_mastery:
194+
score: 6
195+
max: 10
196+
items:
197+
- id: LM-01
198+
name: Idiomatic Usage
199+
score: 4
200+
max: 5
201+
passed: true
202+
comment: Good ggplot2-style grammar usage
203+
- id: LM-02
204+
name: Distinctive Features
205+
score: 2
206+
max: 5
207+
passed: false
208+
comment: Uses ggsize and ggsave with scale but lacks more distinctive letsplot
209+
features
210+
verdict: REJECTED
211+
impl_tags:
212+
dependencies: []
213+
techniques:
214+
- layer-composition
215+
- html-export
216+
patterns:
217+
- data-generation
218+
- iteration-over-groups
219+
dataprep: []
220+
styling:
221+
- alpha-blending
222+
- grid-styling

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)