chore(bokeh): add metadata for ecdf-basic

Author: github-actions[bot]

plots/ecdf-basic/metadata/python/bokeh.yaml

@@ -1,266 +1,21 @@
+# Per-library metadata for bokeh implementation of ecdf-basic
+# Auto-generated by impl-generate.yml
+
 library: bokeh
 language: python
 specification_id: ecdf-basic
 created: '2025-12-23T13:02:55Z'
-updated: '2026-04-24T13:32:51Z'
-generated_by: claude-opus
-workflow_run: 24890383540
+updated: '2026-06-25T09:36:19Z'
+generated_by: claude-sonnet
+workflow_run: 28160456663
 issue: 976
-python_version: 3.14.4
-library_version: 3.9.0
+language_version: 3.13.14
+library_version: 3.9.1
 preview_url_light: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/ecdf-basic/python/bokeh/plot-light.png
 preview_url_dark: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/ecdf-basic/python/bokeh/plot-dark.png
 preview_html_light: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/ecdf-basic/python/bokeh/plot-light.html
 preview_html_dark: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/ecdf-basic/python/bokeh/plot-dark.html
-quality_score: 87
+quality_score: null
 review:
-  strengths:
-  - Correct ECDF implementation using p.step(mode='after') — the step-after mode precisely
-    matches the 1/n jump at each observation
-  - 'Full theme adaptation: PAGE_BG, INK, INK_SOFT tokens applied to all chrome elements
-    in both light and dark renders — no dark-on-dark or light-on-light failures'
-  - 'Excellent data storytelling: percentile reference lines (25th, 50th, 75th) with
-    labeled annotations enable direct quantile reading from the chart'
-  - 'Idiomatic Bokeh usage: ColumnDataSource, add_layout(Span), add_layout(Label),
-    HoverTool with mode=''vline'' — leverages library-specific APIs correctly'
-  - 'Perfect spec compliance: step function increases by 1/n, y-axis 0–1, distinct
-    line style, grid lines for percentile reading, all spec requirements satisfied'
-  - 'Realistic and neutral domain: marathon finish times (normal ~240 min) is a compelling,
-    politically neutral real-world scenario'
-  weaknesses:
-  - 'DE-01 LOW (4/8): Design is a well-configured library default — brand green ECDF
-    on themed chrome is correct but not exceptional. Needs more aesthetic sophistication:
-    consider adding a subtle area fill under the ECDF curve (fill_alpha=0.08), refining
-    typography weight on the title (bold is set but could add font_face), or other
-    polish that elevates it above the baseline.'
-  - 'DE-02 MODERATE (3/6): Visual refinement is present (no outline, y-only grid,
-    minor ticks removed) but could go further — consider adding min_border padding
-    for generous whitespace, or adding a subtle horizontal reference line at y=0.5
-    with distinct styling to emphasize the median visually.'
-  - 'VQ-02 MINOR (5/6): The 50th and 75th percentile labels (at ~242 and ~260 on x-axis)
-    are only 18 minutes apart; at full 4800px resolution with 20pt text, these labels
-    may crowd. Consider staggering label y-positions (e.g., 75th at y=0.08 instead
-    of 0.03) to avoid overlap risk.'
-  - 'DE-03 MODERATE (4/6): Storytelling is good but relies only on the three percentile
-    lines. Adding a light shaded region between Q1 and Q3 (the interquartile range)
-    would give the chart a stronger visual focal point and immediately communicate
-    distribution spread.'
-  - 'LM-02 (3/5): HoverTool and Span/Label are used but could leverage more Bokeh-specific
-    features — e.g., adding a CDSView or a CrosshairTool for richer interactivity
-    consistent with Bokeh''s strengths.'
-  image_description: |-
-    Light render (plot-light.png):
-      Background: Warm off-white consistent with #FAF8F1 — correct light surface, no pure white.
-      Chrome: Title "Marathon Finish Times · ecdf-basic · bokeh · anyplot.ai" in bold dark text, clearly visible top-left. Y-axis label "Cumulative Proportion of Runners" rotated, readable. X-axis label "Finish Time (minutes)" clearly visible at bottom. Tick labels on both axes in medium-dark secondary text — all legible.
-      Data: Single ECDF step line in brand green (#009E73), line_width=4, clearly distinguishable from the warm background. Three dashed vertical reference lines in INK_SOFT gray mark 25th (~218 min), 50th/median (~242 min), and 75th (~260 min) percentiles. Annotation labels at y=0.03 in italic INK_SOFT: "25th: 218 min", "50th (median): 242 min", "75th: 260 min". Y-axis grid lines subtle at 10% opacity. No box outline.
-      Legibility verdict: PASS — all text readable, no light-on-light failures. Labels for 50th and 75th percentiles are close in x-position but appear readable in the thumbnail.
-
-    Dark render (plot-dark.png):
-      Background: Near-black consistent with #1A1A17 — correct dark surface, no pure black.
-      Chrome: Title and axis labels render in light (#F0EFE8) text — clearly visible against dark background. Tick labels in lighter secondary tone (#B8B7B0) — all readable. No dark-on-dark failures detected.
-      Data: ECDF step line in identical brand green (#009E73) — color matches light render exactly, confirming Okabe-Ito data colors are theme-independent. Dashed reference lines in light gray (INK_SOFT dark = #B8B7B0). Annotation labels also in #B8B7B0 — readable on dark surface. Y-only grid at 10% alpha — subtle, not dominant.
-      Legibility verdict: PASS — all text readable against dark background. Data green is visible and identical to light theme.
-  criteria_checklist:
-    visual_quality:
-      score: 29
-      max: 30
-      items:
-      - id: VQ-01
-        name: Text Legibility
-        score: 8
-        max: 8
-        passed: true
-        comment: 'All sizes explicitly set: title 28pt, axis labels 22pt, tick labels
-          18pt, annotations 20pt — all readable in both themes'
-      - id: VQ-02
-        name: No Overlap
-        score: 5
-        max: 6
-        passed: true
-        comment: 50th and 75th percentile labels are only ~18 units apart; minor crowding
-          risk at full resolution
-      - id: VQ-03
-        name: Element Visibility
-        score: 6
-        max: 6
-        passed: true
-        comment: ECDF line at line_width=4 clearly visible; reference spans and labels
-          all readable
-      - id: VQ-04
-        name: Color Accessibility
-        score: 2
-        max: 2
-        passed: true
-        comment: Single series in brand green on neutral background — excellent contrast,
-          CVD-safe
-      - id: VQ-05
-        name: Layout & Canvas
-        score: 4
-        max: 4
-        passed: true
-        comment: 4800x2700 canvas well utilized, balanced margins, nothing cut off
-      - id: VQ-06
-        name: Axis Labels & Title
-        score: 2
-        max: 2
-        passed: true
-        comment: '''Finish Time (minutes)'' and ''Cumulative Proportion of Runners''
-          — descriptive with units'
-      - id: VQ-07
-        name: Palette Compliance
-        score: 2
-        max: 2
-        passed: true
-        comment: 'First series #009E73 correct; background #FAF8F1/#1A1A17 correct;
-          all chrome theme-adaptive in both renders'
-    design_excellence:
-      score: 11
-      max: 20
-      items:
-      - id: DE-01
-        name: Aesthetic Sophistication
-        score: 4
-        max: 8
-        passed: false
-        comment: Well-configured library default — brand green and themed chrome correct
-          but not exceptional; no area fill, gradient, or distinctive design flair
-      - id: DE-02
-        name: Visual Refinement
-        score: 3
-        max: 6
-        passed: false
-        comment: No box outline, y-only grid at 10% alpha, minor ticks removed — above
-          default, but generous whitespace padding and min_border not set
-      - id: DE-03
-        name: Data Storytelling
-        score: 4
-        max: 6
-        passed: false
-        comment: Percentile reference lines + annotations create good visual storytelling;
-          missing IQR shading or other focal emphasis for stronger hierarchy
-    spec_compliance:
-      score: 15
-      max: 15
-      items:
-      - id: SC-01
-        name: Plot Type
-        score: 5
-        max: 5
-        passed: true
-        comment: Correct ECDF using p.step(mode='after') — step-after matches 1/n
-          jump at each observation
-      - id: SC-02
-        name: Required Features
-        score: 4
-        max: 4
-        passed: true
-        comment: Step function 1/n increments, y-axis 0-1 (with 1.02 padding), distinct
-          line style, grid for percentile reading — all present
-      - id: SC-03
-        name: Data Mapping
-        score: 3
-        max: 3
-        passed: true
-        comment: X=finish times, Y=cumulative proportion 0-1, all 300 data points
-          shown
-      - id: SC-04
-        name: Title & Legend
-        score: 3
-        max: 3
-        passed: true
-        comment: Title includes 'ecdf-basic · bokeh · anyplot.ai' with descriptive
-          prefix; no legend for single series (correct)
-    data_quality:
-      score: 15
-      max: 15
-      items:
-      - id: DQ-01
-        name: Feature Coverage
-        score: 6
-        max: 6
-        passed: true
-        comment: Shows ECDF S-curve, step function character, percentile reading —
-          all key aspects of ECDF visualized
-      - id: DQ-02
-        name: Realistic Context
-        score: 5
-        max: 5
-        passed: true
-        comment: Marathon finish times for recreational runners — real, neutral, scientifically
-          plausible domain
-      - id: DQ-03
-        name: Appropriate Scale
-        score: 4
-        max: 4
-        passed: true
-        comment: normal(loc=240, scale=32) minutes — ~4 hours mean with 32 min std
-          dev is realistic for recreational marathoners
-    code_quality:
-      score: 10
-      max: 10
-      items:
-      - id: CQ-01
-        name: KISS Structure
-        score: 3
-        max: 3
-        passed: true
-        comment: 'Linear: imports → tokens → data → ECDF calc → figure → style → save;
-          no functions or classes'
-      - id: CQ-02
-        name: Reproducibility
-        score: 2
-        max: 2
-        passed: true
-        comment: np.random.seed(42) set
-      - id: CQ-03
-        name: Clean Imports
-        score: 2
-        max: 2
-        passed: true
-        comment: All imported symbols (export_png, output_file, save, ColumnDataSource,
-          HoverTool, Label, Span, figure) are used
-      - id: CQ-04
-        name: Code Elegance
-        score: 2
-        max: 2
-        passed: true
-        comment: Loop for percentile reference lines is clean; no over-engineering
-          or fake functionality
-      - id: CQ-05
-        name: Output & API
-        score: 1
-        max: 1
-        passed: true
-        comment: Saves plot-{THEME}.png and plot-{THEME}.html; current Bokeh API
-    library_mastery:
-      score: 7
-      max: 10
-      items:
-      - id: LM-01
-        name: Idiomatic Usage
-        score: 4
-        max: 5
-        passed: true
-        comment: ColumnDataSource, p.step() with correct mode='after', add_layout(Span),
-          add_layout(Label), HoverTool with renderers — idiomatic Bokeh patterns used
-          correctly
-      - id: LM-02
-        name: Distinctive Features
-        score: 3
-        max: 5
-        passed: false
-        comment: HoverTool with mode='vline' and Span/Label annotations are distinctly
-          Bokeh; could further leverage CrosshairTool or custom JS callbacks
-  verdict: REJECTED
-impl_tags:
-  dependencies: []
-  techniques:
-  - hover-tooltips
-  - html-export
-  - annotations
-  patterns:
-  - data-generation
-  - columndatasource
-  dataprep: []
-  styling:
-  - alpha-blending
+  strengths: []
+  weaknesses: []