1- # Per-library metadata for pygal implementation of column-stratigraphic
2- # Auto-generated by impl-generate.yml
3-
41library : pygal
52specification_id : column-stratigraphic
63created : ' 2026-03-15T22:57:51Z'
7- updated : ' 2026-03-15T22:57:51Z '
4+ updated : ' 2026-03-15T23:03:03Z '
85generated_by : claude-opus-4-5-20251101
96workflow_run : 23121198913
107issue : 4573
@@ -13,7 +10,222 @@ library_version: 3.1.0
1310preview_url : https://storage.googleapis.com/pyplots-images/plots/column-stratigraphic/pygal/plot.png
1411preview_thumb : https://storage.googleapis.com/pyplots-images/plots/column-stratigraphic/pygal/plot_thumb.png
1512preview_html : https://storage.googleapis.com/pyplots-images/plots/column-stratigraphic/pygal/plot.html
16- quality_score : null
13+ quality_score : 76
1714review :
18- strengths : []
19- weaknesses : []
15+ strengths :
16+ - Excellent spec compliance with all required features present and well-executed
17+ - Well-crafted SVG lithology patterns approximating standard geological conventions
18+ - Coherent geological data with proper chronological ordering and realistic formation
19+ names
20+ - Clean readable monospace typography appropriate for scientific visualization
21+ weaknesses :
22+ - Library mastery critically low - pygal used only as SVG container with dummy data,
23+ none of pygal charting features utilized
24+ - Significant empty white space on right 40% of canvas
25+ - Siltstone and conglomerate background colors too similar (both tan/brown)
26+ image_description : ' The plot displays a vertical stratigraphic column spanning 0-135m
27+ depth with 10 geological layers. The title "column-stratigraphic · pygal · pyplots.ai"
28+ appears at top center in monospace font. On the left, an "Age" column lists geological
29+ periods (Eocene, Paleocene, Late Cretaceous, Early Cretaceous, Jurassic, Triassic)
30+ with vertical brackets grouping contiguous layers. A "Depth (m)" scale with tick
31+ marks every 10m runs alongside the column. The central column shows rectangular
32+ blocks filled with distinct lithology patterns: yellow with stipple dots (sandstone),
33+ gray with horizontal dashes (shale), light blue with brick pattern (limestone),
34+ tan with short dashes (siltstone), burlywood with circles (conglomerate), medium
35+ gray with thin lines (mudstone), and purple-pink with diamond crosshatch (dolomite).
36+ Formation names appear in monospace to the right of each layer, with lithology
37+ type in smaller italic gray text further right. A "Lithology Key" in the upper
38+ right shows all 7 pattern swatches with labels. The right approximately 40% of
39+ the canvas is largely empty white space.'
40+ criteria_checklist :
41+ visual_quality :
42+ score : 26
43+ max : 30
44+ items :
45+ - id : VQ-01
46+ name : Text Legibility
47+ score : 7
48+ max : 8
49+ passed : true
50+ comment : ' Font sizes explicitly set (34, 30, 28, 26, 36px). All readable.
51+ Minor: italic lithology labels at 26px slightly small.'
52+ - id : VQ-02
53+ name : No Overlap
54+ score : 6
55+ max : 6
56+ passed : true
57+ comment : No overlapping text anywhere. All labels well-spaced.
58+ - id : VQ-03
59+ name : Element Visibility
60+ score : 6
61+ max : 6
62+ passed : true
63+ comment : All lithology patterns distinct and clearly visible. Layer boundaries
64+ sharp.
65+ - id : VQ-04
66+ name : Color Accessibility
67+ score : 3
68+ max : 4
69+ passed : true
70+ comment : Siltstone and conglomerate are both brownish/tan, relying on pattern
71+ alone to differentiate.
72+ - id : VQ-05
73+ name : Layout & Canvas
74+ score : 2
75+ max : 4
76+ passed : false
77+ comment : Stratigraphic column occupies left ~55% of canvas. Right side largely
78+ empty.
79+ - id : VQ-06
80+ name : Axis Labels & Title
81+ score : 2
82+ max : 2
83+ passed : true
84+ comment : Depth (m) includes units. Age header present. Title correct format.
85+ design_excellence :
86+ score : 11
87+ max : 20
88+ items :
89+ - id : DE-01
90+ name : Aesthetic Sophistication
91+ score : 5
92+ max : 8
93+ passed : true
94+ comment : Custom SVG lithology patterns well-crafted. Monospace font gives
95+ technical feel. Above defaults but not publication-ready.
96+ - id : DE-02
97+ name : Visual Refinement
98+ score : 3
99+ max : 6
100+ passed : true
101+ comment : Clean white background, no unnecessary grid, age brackets are nice.
102+ Significant wasted space on right.
103+ - id : DE-03
104+ name : Data Storytelling
105+ score : 3
106+ max : 6
107+ passed : true
108+ comment : Geological sequence tells coherent temporal narrative. Age brackets
109+ provide context. No strong focal point.
110+ spec_compliance :
111+ score : 15
112+ max : 15
113+ items :
114+ - id : SC-01
115+ name : Plot Type
116+ score : 5
117+ max : 5
118+ passed : true
119+ comment : ' Correct chart type: vertical stratigraphic column with stacked lithology
120+ blocks.'
121+ - id : SC-02
122+ name : Required Features
123+ score : 4
124+ max : 4
125+ passed : true
126+ comment : ' All spec features present: 7 lithology patterns, depth scale, formation
127+ names, age labels, layer boundaries.'
128+ - id : SC-03
129+ name : Data Mapping
130+ score : 3
131+ max : 3
132+ passed : true
133+ comment : Depth mapping correct, layers properly positioned and scaled.
134+ - id : SC-04
135+ name : Title & Legend
136+ score : 3
137+ max : 3
138+ passed : true
139+ comment : Title format correct. Lithology Key shows all 7 types with pattern
140+ swatches.
141+ data_quality :
142+ score : 14
143+ max : 15
144+ items :
145+ - id : DQ-01
146+ name : Feature Coverage
147+ score : 5
148+ max : 6
149+ passed : true
150+ comment : 10 layers, 7 lithology types, varying thicknesses, 6 geological periods.
151+ Could include unconformity.
152+ - id : DQ-02
153+ name : Realistic Context
154+ score : 5
155+ max : 5
156+ passed : true
157+ comment : Realistic formation names, proper geological ages in correct chronological
158+ order.
159+ - id : DQ-03
160+ name : Appropriate Scale
161+ score : 4
162+ max : 4
163+ passed : true
164+ comment : 0-135m depth range realistic. Layer thicknesses vary naturally.
165+ code_quality :
166+ score : 8
167+ max : 10
168+ items :
169+ - id : CQ-01
170+ name : KISS Structure
171+ score : 2
172+ max : 3
173+ passed : true
174+ comment : Linear flow but extensive manual SVG string construction adds complexity.
175+ - id : CQ-02
176+ name : Reproducibility
177+ score : 2
178+ max : 2
179+ passed : true
180+ comment : Deterministic hardcoded data.
181+ - id : CQ-03
182+ name : Clean Imports
183+ score : 2
184+ max : 2
185+ passed : true
186+ comment : ' All imports used: cairosvg, pygal, Style.'
187+ - id : CQ-04
188+ name : Code Elegance
189+ score : 1
190+ max : 2
191+ passed : false
192+ comment : Bypasses pygal charting API, using it only as SVG container with
193+ dummy data.
194+ - id : CQ-05
195+ name : Output & API
196+ score : 1
197+ max : 1
198+ passed : true
199+ comment : Saves as plot.png via cairosvg. Also saves plot.html.
200+ library_mastery :
201+ score : 2
202+ max : 10
203+ items :
204+ - id : LM-01
205+ name : Idiomatic Usage
206+ score : 1
207+ max : 5
208+ passed : false
209+ comment : Pygal used only as SVG scaffold with dummy data. No data API, series,
210+ labeling, or axis features utilized.
211+ - id : LM-02
212+ name : Distinctive Features
213+ score : 1
214+ max : 5
215+ passed : false
216+ comment : No distinctive pygal features used. Could be replicated with any
217+ SVG tool.
218+ verdict : REJECTED
219+ impl_tags :
220+ dependencies :
221+ - cairosvg
222+ techniques :
223+ - annotations
224+ - custom-legend
225+ - html-export
226+ patterns :
227+ - iteration-over-groups
228+ dataprep : []
229+ styling :
230+ - minimal-chrome
231+ - edge-highlighting
0 commit comments