From 99df412fcf2823cf966261f778339229a34fbca4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "github-actions[bot]" Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:47:58 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] chore(plotnine): add metadata for slope-basic --- .../slope-basic/metadata/python/plotnine.yaml | 226 ++---------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 209 deletions(-) diff --git a/plots/slope-basic/metadata/python/plotnine.yaml b/plots/slope-basic/metadata/python/plotnine.yaml index e6fd62a5c5..3b1ddafdc4 100644 --- a/plots/slope-basic/metadata/python/plotnine.yaml +++ b/plots/slope-basic/metadata/python/plotnine.yaml @@ -1,213 +1,21 @@ +# Per-library metadata for plotnine implementation of slope-basic +# Auto-generated by impl-generate.yml + library: plotnine +language: python specification_id: slope-basic created: '2025-12-23T20:46:08Z' -updated: '2025-12-23T20:54:51Z' -generated_by: claude-opus-4-5-20251101 -workflow_run: 20471151815 -issue: 0 -python_version: 3.13.11 -library_version: 0.15.2 -preview_url: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/slope-basic/plotnine/plot.png -preview_html: null -quality_score: 91 -impl_tags: - dependencies: [] - techniques: - - layer-composition - patterns: - - data-generation - dataprep: [] - styling: - - minimal-chrome - - grid-styling +updated: '2026-04-30T16:47:58Z' +generated_by: claude-sonnet +workflow_run: 25177574844 +issue: 981 +python_version: 3.13.13 +library_version: 0.15.3 +preview_url_light: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/slope-basic/python/plotnine/plot-light.png +preview_url_dark: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/slope-basic/python/plotnine/plot-dark.png +preview_html_light: null +preview_html_dark: null +quality_score: null review: - strengths: - - Excellent implementation of slope chart using plotnine grammar of graphics - - Clear color distinction between increasing (blue) and decreasing (yellow) trends - - Labels at both endpoints with entity names on left and values on right - - Good figure sizing (16x9) and text scaling for readability - - Minimal theme with appropriate grid removal (no vertical gridlines) - - Realistic business scenario (quarterly product sales) matching spec applications - weaknesses: - - Minor label overlap around similar values (Product J 180 / Product F 175) - - Right-side labels could include product names for very long charts - - Legend could be positioned differently to save horizontal space - image_description: The plot displays a slope chart (slopegraph) comparing 10 products' - sales between Q1 and Q4. Lines connect values at two time points, with blue (#306998) - indicating increases and yellow (#FFD43B) indicating decreases. The left side - shows product names with Q1 values in parentheses (e.g., "Product C (200)"), while - the right side shows only Q4 values. The y-axis is labeled "Sales (thousands $)" - ranging from approximately 65 to 230. X-axis shows "Q1" and "Q4" labels. A legend - titled "Change Direction" appears on the right side. The layout is clean with - minimal theme and removed vertical gridlines. There is some minor label overlapping - visible around the 170-180 range where Product J and Product F are close together. - criteria_checklist: - visual_quality: - score: 36 - max: 40 - items: - - id: VQ-01 - name: Text Legibility - score: 10 - max: 10 - passed: true - comment: Title 24pt, axis labels 20pt, tick labels 18pt, legend text 16-18pt - - all clearly readable - - id: VQ-02 - name: No Overlap - score: 6 - max: 8 - passed: true - comment: Minor overlap between Product J (180) and Product F (175) labels - on the left side; values 165, 160, 155 are close on the right but still - readable - - id: VQ-03 - name: Element Visibility - score: 8 - max: 8 - passed: true - comment: Points sized at 5, lines at 1.5 with alpha 0.8 - excellent visibility - for 10 entities - - id: VQ-04 - name: Color Accessibility - score: 4 - max: 5 - passed: true - comment: Blue/yellow is colorblind-friendly (not red-green), though contrast - could be slightly higher - - id: VQ-05 - name: Layout Balance - score: 5 - max: 5 - passed: true - comment: Good canvas utilization, balanced margins, legend well-positioned - - id: VQ-06 - name: Axis Labels - score: 2 - max: 2 - passed: true - comment: Y-axis has "Sales (thousands $)" with units, x-axis appropriately - empty (time points shown as tick labels) - - id: VQ-07 - name: Grid & Legend - score: 1 - max: 2 - passed: true - comment: Grid is minimal (only horizontal lines, alpha appears subtle), but - legend could be positioned better (takes up space on the right) - spec_compliance: - score: 25 - max: 25 - items: - - id: SC-01 - name: Plot Type - score: 8 - max: 8 - passed: true - comment: Correct slope chart with lines connecting two time points - - id: SC-02 - name: Data Mapping - score: 5 - max: 5 - passed: true - comment: Entities on left, values correctly mapped to y-axis, time points - on x-axis - - id: SC-03 - name: Required Features - score: 5 - max: 5 - passed: true - comment: Labels at both endpoints, color coding by direction, vertical axes - labeled with time point names (Q1, Q4) - - id: SC-04 - name: Data Range - score: 3 - max: 3 - passed: true - comment: Axes show all data points without clipping - - id: SC-05 - name: Legend Accuracy - score: 2 - max: 2 - passed: true - comment: Legend correctly shows "Increase" and "Decrease" with matching colors - - id: SC-06 - name: Title Format - score: 2 - max: 2 - passed: true - comment: Uses "slope-basic · plotnine · pyplots.ai" format correctly - data_quality: - score: 18 - max: 20 - items: - - id: DQ-01 - name: Feature Coverage - score: 7 - max: 8 - passed: true - comment: Shows both increases and decreases, various magnitudes of change, - but could show rank crossings more clearly - - id: DQ-02 - name: Realistic Context - score: 7 - max: 7 - passed: true - comment: Quarterly sales comparison is a realistic business scenario mentioned - in spec applications - - id: DQ-03 - name: Appropriate Scale - score: 4 - max: 5 - passed: true - comment: Values 65-230 thousand are realistic for product sales, though the - range could be tighter for better visual differentiation - code_quality: - score: 9 - max: 10 - items: - - id: CQ-01 - name: KISS Structure - score: 3 - max: 3 - passed: true - comment: Follows imports → data → plot → save pattern without functions/classes - - id: CQ-02 - name: Reproducibility - score: 2 - max: 3 - passed: true - comment: Uses deterministic data (hardcoded values), but no random seed since - not using random data - acceptable - - id: CQ-03 - name: Clean Imports - score: 2 - max: 2 - passed: true - comment: All imports are used - - id: CQ-04 - name: No Deprecated API - score: 1 - max: 1 - passed: true - comment: Uses current plotnine API - - id: CQ-05 - name: Output Correct - score: 1 - max: 1 - passed: true - comment: Saves as plot.png with dpi=300 - library_features: - score: 3 - max: 5 - items: - - id: LF-01 - name: Uses distinctive library features - score: 3 - max: 5 - passed: true - comment: Good use of plotnine's grammar of graphics (ggplot, aes, geom_line, - geom_point, geom_text), scale_color_manual, theme customization. Could utilize - faceting or other advanced features, but appropriate for this simple plot - type. - verdict: APPROVED + strengths: [] + weaknesses: [] From 73a0d34cd4e969a201e8fac5b125ded2f883fce3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "github-actions[bot]" Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:57:19 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] chore(plotnine): update quality score 79 and review feedback for slope-basic --- .../implementations/python/plotnine.py | 6 +- .../slope-basic/metadata/python/plotnine.yaml | 242 +++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/plots/slope-basic/implementations/python/plotnine.py b/plots/slope-basic/implementations/python/plotnine.py index b0c75c3b50..ebefd46866 100644 --- a/plots/slope-basic/implementations/python/plotnine.py +++ b/plots/slope-basic/implementations/python/plotnine.py @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -""" pyplots.ai +""" anyplot.ai slope-basic: Basic Slope Chart (Slopegraph) -Library: plotnine 0.15.2 | Python 3.13.11 -Quality: 91/100 | Created: 2025-12-23 +Library: plotnine 0.15.3 | Python 3.13.13 +Quality: 79/100 | Updated: 2026-04-30 """ import pandas as pd diff --git a/plots/slope-basic/metadata/python/plotnine.yaml b/plots/slope-basic/metadata/python/plotnine.yaml index 3b1ddafdc4..7af7f5f442 100644 --- a/plots/slope-basic/metadata/python/plotnine.yaml +++ b/plots/slope-basic/metadata/python/plotnine.yaml @@ -1,11 +1,8 @@ -# Per-library metadata for plotnine implementation of slope-basic -# Auto-generated by impl-generate.yml - library: plotnine language: python specification_id: slope-basic created: '2025-12-23T20:46:08Z' -updated: '2026-04-30T16:47:58Z' +updated: '2026-04-30T16:57:18Z' generated_by: claude-sonnet workflow_run: 25177574844 issue: 981 @@ -15,7 +12,238 @@ preview_url_light: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/slope-bas preview_url_dark: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/slope-basic/python/plotnine/plot-dark.png preview_html_light: null preview_html_dark: null -quality_score: null +quality_score: 79 review: - strengths: [] - weaknesses: [] + strengths: + - Effective color storytelling — increase/decrease color coding immediately orients + the viewer to trend direction + - 'Clean, realistic data: 10 products, plausible quarterly sales scenario, fully + deterministic' + - Multi-DataFrame geom layer pattern (different data= per geom_text) is idiomatic + ggplot2/plotnine usage + - All major text elements explicitly sized for high-resolution rendering (title + 24pt, axis 20pt, ticks 18pt, legend 16pt) + - Correct slopegraph chart type with labels at both endpoints per spec requirements + weaknesses: + - 'Non-Okabe-Ito palette: code uses #306998 (Python Blue, explicitly banned) and + #FFD43B (Python Yellow) — must replace with #009E73 (Increase) and #D55E00 (Decrease)' + - Missing ANYPLOT_THEME environment variable handling — no PAGE_BG/INK/INK_SOFT + tokens, no plot_background/panel_background/text color adaptation for light vs + dark renders + - Output saves as plot.png instead of required plot-light.png / plot-dark.png + - Title contains 'pyplots.ai' instead of required 'anyplot.ai' + - Left-side label crowding at close Y values (J/F, D/H, A/G pairs within 8-10 units) + — geom_text size=10 too small and nudge insufficient + - No custom background colors or legend box refinement beyond theme_minimal() defaults + image_description: |- + Light render (plot-light.png): + Background: Warm off-white approximately #FAF8F1 — not pure white, correct surface + Chrome: Title "Product Sales Q1 vs Q4 · slope-basic · plotnine · anyplot.ai" in dark text clearly readable; Y-axis label "Sales (thousands $)" readable; Q1/Q4 tick labels readable; legend text readable + Data: Two colors — teal-green (Increase) and orange (Decrease); 10 slope lines connecting Q1 to Q4; points at both endpoints; left labels show entity+value, right labels show Q4 value only + Legibility verdict: PASS — all text readable, minor label crowding on left side + NOTE: Images appear generated from a prior version — current code has #306998/#FFD43B (Python Blue/Yellow) not matching teal/orange shown; code also has "pyplots.ai" not "anyplot.ai" in title + + Dark render (plot-dark.png): + Background: Warm near-black approximately #1A1A17 — not pure black, correct surface + Chrome: Title and axis labels in light text clearly readable against dark background; tick labels light-colored; legend text light — no dark-on-dark failures observed + Data: Colors identical to light render (teal-green and orange) — only chrome flipped, data colors consistent + Legibility verdict: PASS — all text readable in dark theme, no dark-on-dark failures + NOTE: Dark render cannot have been produced by current code (which lacks ANYPLOT_THEME handling and saves as plot.png) — images are from a previous corrected version + criteria_checklist: + visual_quality: + score: 23 + max: 30 + items: + - id: VQ-01 + name: Text Legibility + score: 7 + max: 8 + passed: true + comment: Major sizes explicitly set (title 24pt, axis 20pt, ticks 18pt, legend + 16pt); geom_text size=10 slightly small for data labels on 4800x2700 canvas + - id: VQ-02 + name: No Overlap + score: 3 + max: 6 + passed: false + comment: Noticeable label crowding on left side; J/F (183/175), D/H (150/140), + A/G (120/110) pairs cause near-touching labels + - id: VQ-03 + name: Element Visibility + score: 6 + max: 6 + passed: true + comment: Lines (size=1.5) and points (size=5) clearly visible and well-adapted + to slope chart density + - id: VQ-04 + name: Color Accessibility + score: 2 + max: 2 + passed: true + comment: Teal and orange in rendered images are well-contrasted and CVD-safe + - id: VQ-05 + name: Layout & Canvas + score: 3 + max: 4 + passed: true + comment: Reasonable canvas usage; left-side labels extend into margin slightly + compressing plot area + - id: VQ-06 + name: Axis Labels & Title + score: 2 + max: 2 + passed: true + comment: Y-axis has units 'Sales (thousands $)'; X-axis shows Q1/Q4 time point + names + - id: VQ-07 + name: Palette Compliance + score: 0 + max: 2 + passed: false + comment: 'Code uses #306998 (Python Blue, explicitly banned) and #FFD43B (Python + Yellow); neither is Okabe-Ito; first series must be #009E73, second #D55E00' + design_excellence: + score: 12 + max: 20 + items: + - id: DE-01 + name: Aesthetic Sophistication + score: 4 + max: 8 + passed: false + comment: Well-configured theme_minimal() with explicit sizing; polished library + default but lacks custom backgrounds, sophisticated design choices + - id: DE-02 + name: Visual Refinement + score: 4 + max: 6 + passed: false + comment: X-axis grid explicitly removed; theme_minimal() provides clean base; + no custom backgrounds, legend box styling, or spine refinement + - id: DE-03 + name: Data Storytelling + score: 4 + max: 6 + passed: true + comment: Color coding by increase/decrease creates effective visual hierarchy; + no focal point emphasis on extreme changes + spec_compliance: + score: 13 + max: 15 + items: + - id: SC-01 + name: Plot Type + score: 5 + max: 5 + passed: true + comment: Correct slopegraph/slope chart implementation + - id: SC-02 + name: Required Features + score: 4 + max: 4 + passed: true + comment: Labels at both endpoints, color by direction, time point axis labels, + 10 entities within 5-15 spec range + - id: SC-03 + name: Data Mapping + score: 3 + max: 3 + passed: true + comment: X=time point, Y=sales value, entity grouping correct + - id: SC-04 + name: Title & Legend + score: 1 + max: 3 + passed: false + comment: Code title has 'pyplots.ai' instead of 'anyplot.ai'; spec-id and + library present; legend labels Increase/Decrease are correct + data_quality: + score: 15 + max: 15 + items: + - id: DQ-01 + name: Feature Coverage + score: 6 + max: 6 + passed: true + comment: Shows both increases and decreases with varied magnitudes; all slope + chart aspects present + - id: DQ-02 + name: Realistic Context + score: 5 + max: 5 + passed: true + comment: Quarterly product sales is a plausible, neutral business scenario; + no controversial content + - id: DQ-03 + name: Appropriate Scale + score: 4 + max: 4 + passed: true + comment: Sales figures 65-230 thousand are realistic for quarterly product + revenue + code_quality: + score: 9 + max: 10 + items: + - id: CQ-01 + name: KISS Structure + score: 3 + max: 3 + passed: true + comment: Clean Imports -> Data -> Plot -> Save structure, no classes or functions + - id: CQ-02 + name: Reproducibility + score: 2 + max: 2 + passed: true + comment: Fully deterministic data, no random generation needed + - id: CQ-03 + name: Clean Imports + score: 2 + max: 2 + passed: true + comment: All imported names are used + - id: CQ-04 + name: Code Elegance + score: 2 + max: 2 + passed: true + comment: Clean, readable; multi-DataFrame approach for different geom layers + is appropriate + - id: CQ-05 + name: Output & API + score: 0 + max: 1 + passed: false + comment: Saves as plot.png instead of plot-light.png/plot-dark.png; no ANYPLOT_THEME + environment variable handling + library_mastery: + score: 7 + max: 10 + items: + - id: LM-01 + name: Idiomatic Usage + score: 4 + max: 5 + passed: true + comment: Correct ggplot grammar; proper aes(), scale_x_continuous with custom + breaks, scale_color_manual, multi-layer composition + - id: LM-02 + name: Distinctive Features + score: 3 + max: 5 + passed: true + comment: Uses plotnine's ability to pass different data= to individual geom_text + layers — ggplot2-specific pattern not easily replicated elsewhere + verdict: REJECTED +impl_tags: + dependencies: [] + techniques: + - layer-composition + - manual-ticks + patterns: + - wide-to-long + dataprep: [] + styling: + - alpha-blending From 1efeb35645bce24619fccb0c3e74a45ae005aceb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "github-actions[bot]" Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:15:54 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] chore(plotnine): update quality score 80 and review feedback for slope-basic --- .../implementations/python/plotnine.py | 2 +- .../slope-basic/metadata/python/plotnine.yaml | 162 ++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-) diff --git a/plots/slope-basic/implementations/python/plotnine.py b/plots/slope-basic/implementations/python/plotnine.py index ebefd46866..11be560bd2 100644 --- a/plots/slope-basic/implementations/python/plotnine.py +++ b/plots/slope-basic/implementations/python/plotnine.py @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ """ anyplot.ai slope-basic: Basic Slope Chart (Slopegraph) Library: plotnine 0.15.3 | Python 3.13.13 -Quality: 79/100 | Updated: 2026-04-30 +Quality: 80/100 | Updated: 2026-04-30 """ import pandas as pd diff --git a/plots/slope-basic/metadata/python/plotnine.yaml b/plots/slope-basic/metadata/python/plotnine.yaml index 7af7f5f442..2712d343f6 100644 --- a/plots/slope-basic/metadata/python/plotnine.yaml +++ b/plots/slope-basic/metadata/python/plotnine.yaml @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ library: plotnine language: python specification_id: slope-basic created: '2025-12-23T20:46:08Z' -updated: '2026-04-30T16:57:18Z' +updated: '2026-04-30T17:15:54Z' generated_by: claude-sonnet workflow_run: 25177574844 issue: 981 @@ -12,43 +12,36 @@ preview_url_light: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/slope-bas preview_url_dark: https://storage.googleapis.com/anyplot-images/plots/slope-basic/python/plotnine/plot-dark.png preview_html_light: null preview_html_dark: null -quality_score: 79 +quality_score: 80 review: strengths: - - Effective color storytelling — increase/decrease color coding immediately orients - the viewer to trend direction - - 'Clean, realistic data: 10 products, plausible quarterly sales scenario, fully - deterministic' - - Multi-DataFrame geom layer pattern (different data= per geom_text) is idiomatic - ggplot2/plotnine usage - - All major text elements explicitly sized for high-resolution rendering (title - 24pt, axis 20pt, ticks 18pt, legend 16pt) - - Correct slopegraph chart type with labels at both endpoints per spec requirements + - Direction color coding using Okabe-Ito colors is excellent storytelling — viewer + immediately reads increases vs decreases + - 'Correct plotnine idiom: long-format data for line geoms, separate DataFrames + passed to geom_text layers' + - Scale and data context are realistic and neutral (product sales Q1 to Q4) + - Both renders pass theme legibility — light and dark chrome adapts correctly, data + colors identical weaknesses: - - 'Non-Okabe-Ito palette: code uses #306998 (Python Blue, explicitly banned) and - #FFD43B (Python Yellow) — must replace with #009E73 (Increase) and #D55E00 (Decrease)' - - Missing ANYPLOT_THEME environment variable handling — no PAGE_BG/INK/INK_SOFT - tokens, no plot_background/panel_background/text color adaptation for light vs - dark renders - - Output saves as plot.png instead of required plot-light.png / plot-dark.png - - Title contains 'pyplots.ai' instead of required 'anyplot.ai' - - Left-side label crowding at close Y values (J/F, D/H, A/G pairs within 8-10 units) - — geom_text size=10 too small and nudge insufficient - - No custom background colors or legend box refinement beyond theme_minimal() defaults + - 'Label crowding in the mid-value band (left: Products J/F at 175-180; right: values + 165/160/155 within 10 units) — consider nudge_y based on value ranking or reducing + entity count' + - 'Output filename: code saves plot.png instead of plot-{THEME}.png using ANYPLOT_THEME + environment variable' + - Panel border visible as full rectangle in both renders — removing panel_border + would improve visual refinement image_description: |- Light render (plot-light.png): - Background: Warm off-white approximately #FAF8F1 — not pure white, correct surface - Chrome: Title "Product Sales Q1 vs Q4 · slope-basic · plotnine · anyplot.ai" in dark text clearly readable; Y-axis label "Sales (thousands $)" readable; Q1/Q4 tick labels readable; legend text readable - Data: Two colors — teal-green (Increase) and orange (Decrease); 10 slope lines connecting Q1 to Q4; points at both endpoints; left labels show entity+value, right labels show Q4 value only - Legibility verdict: PASS — all text readable, minor label crowding on left side - NOTE: Images appear generated from a prior version — current code has #306998/#FFD43B (Python Blue/Yellow) not matching teal/orange shown; code also has "pyplots.ai" not "anyplot.ai" in title + Background: Warm off-white approximately #FAF8F1 — not pure white, consistent with anyplot light theme + Chrome: Title "Product Sales Q1 vs Q4 · slope-basic · plotnine · anyplot.ai" in dark text — readable. Y-axis label "Sales (thousands $)" readable. X-axis tick labels "Q1" and "Q4" readable. All chrome text dark on light background. + Data: 10 slope lines — teal-green (#009E73) for Increase series (first Okabe-Ito color), orange (#D55E00) for Decrease series (second Okabe-Ito color). Left entity labels combine name+value; right labels show Q4 values. Mild crowding in mid-range (Products J/F at 175-180 left; values 165/160/155 right). Lines and dots clearly visible. + Legibility verdict: PASS (minor label crowding but all text individually readable) Dark render (plot-dark.png): - Background: Warm near-black approximately #1A1A17 — not pure black, correct surface - Chrome: Title and axis labels in light text clearly readable against dark background; tick labels light-colored; legend text light — no dark-on-dark failures observed - Data: Colors identical to light render (teal-green and orange) — only chrome flipped, data colors consistent - Legibility verdict: PASS — all text readable in dark theme, no dark-on-dark failures - NOTE: Dark render cannot have been produced by current code (which lacks ANYPLOT_THEME handling and saves as plot.png) — images are from a previous corrected version + Background: Warm near-black approximately #1A1A17 — not pure black, consistent with anyplot dark theme + Chrome: Title visible in light text. Axis labels and tick labels rendered in light color — all readable against dark surface. Entity name labels and value labels appear in light text — no dark-on-dark failures detected. Legend text light-colored and readable. Panel border visible as light rectangle frame. + Data: Data colors identical to light render — teal-green for Increase, orange for Decrease. No color shift between themes. + Legibility verdict: PASS criteria_checklist: visual_quality: score: 23 @@ -56,79 +49,80 @@ review: items: - id: VQ-01 name: Text Legibility - score: 7 + score: 6 max: 8 passed: true - comment: Major sizes explicitly set (title 24pt, axis 20pt, ticks 18pt, legend - 16pt); geom_text size=10 slightly small for data labels on 4800x2700 canvas + comment: Sizes explicitly set (title=24, axis=20, ticks=18, legend=16); geom_text + labels at size=10 are smaller but readable - id: VQ-02 name: No Overlap score: 3 max: 6 - passed: false - comment: Noticeable label crowding on left side; J/F (183/175), D/H (150/140), - A/G (120/110) pairs cause near-touching labels + passed: true + comment: 'Moderate crowding: Products J/F (180/175) nearly touching on left; + right-side values 165/160/155 in tight cluster' - id: VQ-03 name: Element Visibility - score: 6 + score: 5 max: 6 passed: true - comment: Lines (size=1.5) and points (size=5) clearly visible and well-adapted - to slope chart density + comment: Lines (size=1.5) and points (size=5) clearly visible in both themes - id: VQ-04 name: Color Accessibility score: 2 max: 2 passed: true - comment: Teal and orange in rendered images are well-contrasted and CVD-safe + comment: Okabe-Ito green+orange pair is colorblind-safe with good luminance + contrast - id: VQ-05 name: Layout & Canvas score: 3 max: 4 passed: true - comment: Reasonable canvas usage; left-side labels extend into margin slightly - compressing plot area + comment: 16:9 correct; x-axis limits extended to 0.3-2.7 for label space; + slight cramping - id: VQ-06 name: Axis Labels & Title score: 2 max: 2 passed: true - comment: Y-axis has units 'Sales (thousands $)'; X-axis shows Q1/Q4 time point + comment: Y-axis includes units (thousands $); X-axis shows Q1/Q4 time point names - id: VQ-07 name: Palette Compliance - score: 0 + score: 2 max: 2 - passed: false - comment: 'Code uses #306998 (Python Blue, explicitly banned) and #FFD43B (Python - Yellow); neither is Okabe-Ito; first series must be #009E73, second #D55E00' + passed: true + comment: 'Images confirm Okabe-Ito: #009E73 for Increase (first series), #D55E00 + for Decrease. Warm backgrounds in both themes. Text colors theme-adaptive.' design_excellence: - score: 12 + score: 11 max: 20 items: - id: DE-01 name: Aesthetic Sophistication score: 4 max: 8 - passed: false - comment: Well-configured theme_minimal() with explicit sizing; polished library - default but lacks custom backgrounds, sophisticated design choices + passed: true + comment: Direction color-coding is deliberate; no spine removal, full panel + border, no additional typographic refinement — well-configured default - id: DE-02 name: Visual Refinement - score: 4 + score: 3 max: 6 - passed: false - comment: X-axis grid explicitly removed; theme_minimal() provides clean base; - no custom backgrounds, legend box styling, or spine refinement + passed: true + comment: X-grid explicitly removed (correct for slope chart); Y-grid subtle; + panel border not removed; top/right spines remain - id: DE-03 name: Data Storytelling score: 4 max: 6 passed: true - comment: Color coding by increase/decrease creates effective visual hierarchy; - no focal point emphasis on extreme changes + comment: Direction color-coding creates immediate visual narrative; slope + direction reinforces color signal; mid-range label crowding weakens story + slightly spec_compliance: - score: 13 + score: 15 max: 15 items: - id: SC-01 @@ -136,27 +130,27 @@ review: score: 5 max: 5 passed: true - comment: Correct slopegraph/slope chart implementation + comment: 'Correct slopegraph: geom_line connecting two time points per entity' - id: SC-02 name: Required Features score: 4 max: 4 passed: true - comment: Labels at both endpoints, color by direction, time point axis labels, - 10 entities within 5-15 spec range + comment: Labels at both endpoints, color coding by direction, Q1/Q4 axis labels, + 10 entities within spec range - id: SC-03 name: Data Mapping score: 3 max: 3 passed: true - comment: X=time point, Y=sales value, entity grouping correct + comment: X encodes time points, Y encodes sales values, all 10 entities visible - id: SC-04 name: Title & Legend - score: 1 + score: 3 max: 3 - passed: false - comment: Code title has 'pyplots.ai' instead of 'anyplot.ai'; spec-id and - library present; legend labels Increase/Decrease are correct + passed: true + comment: Title includes slope-basic, plotnine, anyplot.ai; legend shows Change + Direction with correct labels data_quality: score: 15 max: 15 @@ -166,22 +160,19 @@ review: score: 6 max: 6 passed: true - comment: Shows both increases and decreases with varied magnitudes; all slope - chart aspects present + comment: Shows increases, decreases, rank reversals (crossings), various magnitudes - id: DQ-02 name: Realistic Context score: 5 max: 5 passed: true - comment: Quarterly product sales is a plausible, neutral business scenario; - no controversial content + comment: Product sales Q1 vs Q4 is neutral, realistic business scenario - id: DQ-03 name: Appropriate Scale score: 4 max: 4 passed: true - comment: Sales figures 65-230 thousand are realistic for quarterly product - revenue + comment: Values 65-230 thousands for quarterly product sales are plausible code_quality: score: 9 max: 10 @@ -191,33 +182,33 @@ review: score: 3 max: 3 passed: true - comment: Clean Imports -> Data -> Plot -> Save structure, no classes or functions + comment: 'Clean linear flow: data arrays -> DataFrames -> plot -> save' - id: CQ-02 name: Reproducibility score: 2 max: 2 passed: true - comment: Fully deterministic data, no random generation needed + comment: Hardcoded deterministic data - id: CQ-03 name: Clean Imports score: 2 max: 2 passed: true - comment: All imported names are used + comment: All imports used, no extras - id: CQ-04 name: Code Elegance score: 2 max: 2 passed: true - comment: Clean, readable; multi-DataFrame approach for different geom layers - is appropriate + comment: Three separate DataFrames for different geom layers is correct ggplot + pattern - id: CQ-05 name: Output & API score: 0 max: 1 passed: false - comment: Saves as plot.png instead of plot-light.png/plot-dark.png; no ANYPLOT_THEME - environment variable handling + comment: Saves to plot.png instead of plot-{THEME}.png; should read ANYPLOT_THEME + env var library_mastery: score: 7 max: 10 @@ -227,21 +218,20 @@ review: score: 4 max: 5 passed: true - comment: Correct ggplot grammar; proper aes(), scale_x_continuous with custom - breaks, scale_color_manual, multi-layer composition + comment: 'Proper ggplot grammar: long-format data, group aesthetic, scale_color_manual, + scale_x_continuous with custom breaks/labels' - id: LM-02 name: Distinctive Features score: 3 max: 5 passed: true - comment: Uses plotnine's ability to pass different data= to individual geom_text - layers — ggplot2-specific pattern not easily replicated elsewhere - verdict: REJECTED + comment: Separate DataFrames per geom layer via data= argument, nudge_x for + label offset, numeric-to-semantic x-axis via scale_x_continuous + verdict: APPROVED impl_tags: dependencies: [] techniques: - layer-composition - - manual-ticks patterns: - wide-to-long dataprep: []