-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
Remove redundant declarations and update docs #727
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
bjwtaylor
wants to merge
2
commits into
Mbed-TLS:development
Choose a base branch
from
bjwtaylor:redundant-declarations
base: development
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | ||
| API changes | ||
| * Change crypto.h so the functions duplicated in crypto_structs are internal | ||
| only. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Marking some function prototypes as Doxygen-only doesn't make sense. The reason to have prototypes is so that the C compiler sees them.
The reason some
static inlinefunctions have a prototype incrypto.hand a definition incrypto_struct.his that the prototypes are the same for everyone, but the function definitions are not. By default, TF-PSA-Crypto presents itself a library. But it can also be integrated as a client and server, in which case the integrator makes some changes:MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_CLIENTbut notMBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_C.crypto_struct.hto change the definitions of operation structures, typically to have an operation handle instead of cryptographic material.static inlinefunctions that manipulate a local struct) that makes remote procedure calls to the server.MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_SPMand likelyMBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_KEY_ID_ENCODES_OWNER.While the definitions of the struct constructors in
crypto_struct.hare customizable, their prototypes are not. Hence the prototypes live incrypto.h. And the prototypes must be visible to the C compiler.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That being said, is the current code really what it should be? No, there are two things that I never got around to fixing.
psa_key_attributes_tis not supposed to be user-serviceable, unlike operation structures. So it should be incrypto_types.h, and its inline accessor functions should not be defined incrypto_struct.h.psa_xxx_init()) don't actually need to be incrypto_struct.h, because their textual definition is actually the same for everyone. They're defined in terms of the correspondingPSA_XXX_INITmacro. Only the macro needs to be customized if you customize the struct layout.We could fix this. It would be an incompatible change for integrators who customize
crypto_struct.h. We don't explicitly promise any backward compatibility for such custom integrations, so I think it would be ok to do what I just wrote in the development branch. But I don't think we should do it in an LTS branch unless there's a compelling reason, and I don't see a compelling reason.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, thanks for your comments. Let's put this one on hold pending design review of the original issue. There is also a related PR here: Mbed-TLS/mbedtls#10659. It's the same issue, but not the same solution. Let me know what you think about this one, maybe we just decide we don't want to fix these warnings?