Reorganize examples directory structure and update file paths#523
Reorganize examples directory structure and update file paths#523MervinPraison merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for praisonai canceled.
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes remove two ESLint configuration files: Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @MervinPraison, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
Hello! Gemini here, providing a summary of this pull request by @MervinPraison.
The title of this PR suggests a reorganization of the examples directory structure and updates to file paths. However, based on the provided patch content, the changes primarily involve the deletion of two ESLint configuration files. One appears to be a traditional .eslintrc.json file, and the other seems to be an eslint.config.js file using the newer flat configuration format, both related to linting MDX files. It's possible that the directory reorganization and path updates mentioned in the title are either not included in the provided patches or are handled in a different way not visible here.
Highlights
- Configuration Removal: Two ESLint configuration files, one in JSON format and one in JavaScript flat config format, have been removed. These files were previously used for linting MDX files.
Changelog
- Removed an ESLint configuration file (likely
.eslintrc.json) previously used for MDX linting. - Removed another ESLint configuration file (likely
eslint.config.js) using the flat config format, also related to MDX linting.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Config files gone,
Linting rules now disappear,
Clean slate for new paths.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request, titled 'Reorganize examples directory structure and update file paths', primarily involves the deletion of two ESLint configuration files (both presented with empty filenames in the diff). One appears to be a JSON-based ESLint config for MDX, and the other a JavaScript-based ESLint flat config, also for MDX. While reorganizing examples might make some configurations obsolete, the removal of linting rules without an explicit replacement or justification in the PR description raises concerns about maintaining code quality in MDX examples. Clarification on whether this linting is still needed or handled elsewhere would be beneficial.
Summary of Findings
- Removal of MDX JSON Linting Configuration: An ESLint JSON configuration file for MDX (extending
plugin:mdx/recommendedand enabling code block linting) has been deleted. Clarification is needed on whether this linting is intentionally removed or replaced, as its absence could impact MDX content quality if such content remains and requires these checks. - Removal of MDX JavaScript Linting Configuration: An ESLint JavaScript (flat) configuration file for MDX (using
eslint-plugin-mdxand defining rules likeno-var) has been deleted. It's important to understand if this linting is still required for the examples or if it's handled elsewhere, to ensure continued code quality for any relevant MDX files.
Merge Readiness
I am unable to approve this pull request directly. Given the removal of ESLint configurations for MDX files without a clear explanation in the pull request description, I recommend REQUEST_CHANGES. It's important to clarify the intent behind these deletions. If this linting is still valuable for the examples, please ensure it's either reinstated or handled by an alternative mechanism. If it's intentionally removed (e.g., MDX examples are no longer part of the project or linting is handled differently), a brief explanation in the PR description would be helpful for context and future reference. Please address these points before merging.
Reorganize examples directory structure and update file paths
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit