Skip to content

implement prefer silk touch to Auto Tool#5730

Open
noramibu wants to merge 5 commits into
MeteorDevelopment:masterfrom
noramibu:autotool-improvement
Open

implement prefer silk touch to Auto Tool#5730
noramibu wants to merge 5 commits into
MeteorDevelopment:masterfrom
noramibu:autotool-improvement

Conversation

@noramibu

@noramibu noramibu commented Oct 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature

Description

removed silk touch for ender chest option and implemented a whitelist for silk touch. If a suitable tool exists and block is in whitelist, it will always prefer silk touch (unless user doesn't have a silk touch tool, in that case it will choose most suitable tool (or fortune tool if fortuneForOresCrops enabled))

also fixed fortuneForOresCrops wasn't working for crops because there was no suitable tool for it (now they simply bypass tool check if fortuneForOresCrops is on)

Related issues

#5729 #5243 #5983

How Has This Been Tested?

https://youtu.be/ECl49wCImMs

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project.
  • I have added comments to my code in more complex areas.
  • I have tested the code in both development and production environments.

@noramibu noramibu changed the title implement -prefer silk touch- to Auto Tool implement prefer silk touch to Auto Tool Oct 1, 2025
Comment thread src/main/java/meteordevelopment/meteorclient/systems/modules/player/AutoTool.java Outdated
@noramibu noramibu requested a review from machiecodes October 1, 2025 18:19
@noramibu

noramibu commented Oct 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

turns out fortune for ores and crops option doesn't work on crops bcs there's simply no suitable tool for it. a simple bypass would do the trick for #5243

@noramibu

noramibu commented Oct 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

this would do the trick

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants