[BULK] [Bundle-Security] - Scheduled execution to fix known issues#1137
Merged
wadepickett merged 12 commits intoApr 11, 2026
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
#docutune-review |
wadepickett
reviewed
Apr 10, 2026
This should have a description of the interface instead. Not sure why a guid of the same topic was there to begin with. Replaced the GUID with a description as it should be.
wadepickett
reviewed
Apr 10, 2026
Contributor
|
Some of these GUID's are actual it's the COM IID's, the interface identifier the developer literally needs to inherit from, etc. Those I am reverting, but adding clarficaiton to what they are where needeed. However there are also some legit GUID's that need to be removed here that are GUID's for the API ref document put in a description, where instead, and actual description for the API should have been there instead. So doing that rather than putting a generic GUID in. In those cases the GUID should not have been in there in the first place. I am correcting these at the moment... |
wadepickett
reviewed
Apr 11, 2026
wadepickett
reviewed
Apr 11, 2026
Removed link that contained the GUID since that page no longer exists to link to.
wadepickett
reviewed
Apr 11, 2026
The GIUD was part a URL, replacing with a generic GUID was not helpful. The original topic the link was to no longer exists, so the link was removed.
wadepickett
reviewed
Apr 11, 2026
The GUID replaced with a generic was part of a URL. The topic for that URL no longer exists, so removing the link rather then creating a new broken link witha generic GUID.
wadepickett
reviewed
Apr 11, 2026
Guid being replaced was part of a URL. The original topic no longer exists, so removing the link altogether.
wadepickett
reviewed
Apr 11, 2026
Removing dead link altogether, no replacement apge available.
wadepickett
reviewed
Apr 11, 2026
wadepickett
reviewed
Apr 11, 2026
Link needed to be updated rather than the GUID in the link being replaced with a generic GUID, which would break the URL link.
wadepickett
approved these changes
Apr 11, 2026
Contributor
wadepickett
left a comment
wadepickett
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved after replacing the generic GUID's with either link updates or link removals. In some cases legitimate COM UUID's were referred to which developers need to know and use as is so they cannot be replaced. I noted those.
wadepickett
deleted the
learn-build-service-prodbot/docutune-autopr-20260404-174206-9095421-ignore-build
branch
This was referenced Apr 11, 2026
Contributor
|
I also registered the COM UUID on the SFI form to avoid having it flagged again. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Remediating articles to align with content SFI guidance related to sensitive terms with GUIDs, thumbprints, and secrets.
DocuTune v1.0.0.0
CorrelationId: 6361ec82-d918-4e1c-a911-7fa74bbaad2b
#docutune
Note from reviewer to PR automation author: It would be helpful to provide a contact in these descriptions so we can communicate improvements that are needed to avoid issues that are repeated in the automation.