Conversation
|
Note: Conversation about the checklist is still pending but I'm going to use this version for now. It can give us a better idea if its useful and how we can improve/change it. Feed Submission ChecklistThanks for contributing to the MobilityDatabase! This is a comprehensive checklist detailing the things to consider before submitting a feed to the database. The schema links in this checklist will follow the convention of [1] for schedule feed schema and [2] for realtime feeds. You will find the schema definitions for schedule and realtime feeds are often the same, but both references are always included for completeness. If you have any questions, reach out to @ianktc. General Checks
Official:
Unofficial and Unknown:
Is Your Feed New?
Is Your Feed an Update?
Is it a Realtime Feed?
Pre-existing Feed Existence [internal]
False Hits: "Direkcija": Other Considerations [internal]Sometimes you will encounter two active schedule feeds. There are some possible reasons this may occur:
|
| ], | ||
| "provider": "Polskie Koleje Państwowe Intercity (PKP Intercity)", | ||
| "urls": { | ||
| "direct_download": "https://gtfs.kasznia.net/rt/pkpic.pb", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We already have a PKP link - if you're confident this is the official one, maybe we can deprecate the unofficial? https://mobilitydatabase.org/feeds/gtfs/mdb-2088
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks like the schedule feed tied to this new realtime feed actually! Will make this link
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh wait sorry i think i already did make the static reference 😅 It is referencing 2088 already ✅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My bad! I wasn't delineating between schedule and realtime feeds when I was checking. All good.
| "municipality": "" | ||
| }, | ||
| "urls": { | ||
| "direct_download": "https://territori.gencat.cat/web/.content/home/serveis/visors-cartografia/bases-cartografiques/infraestructures-mobilitat/autobusos-interurbans/busos-interurbans-GTFS.zip", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So I checked the validator results for both these feeds and they appear different (number of entities, publisher, service window). I think they are different but I might be missing something
https://files.mobilitydatabase.org/mdb-2832/mdb-2832-202512100133/report_7.1.0.html
https://gtfs-validator-results.mobilitydata.org/e3822ada-1028-4a96-ac69-e9b5498f6b2d/report.html
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Then let's use both for now :)
Addresses Issues:
#1143: realtime (no validation report)
#1123: realtime (no validation report)
#1170: https://gtfs-validator-results.mobilitydata.org/c8038bc8-e809-4327-8d12-9add6e2c70a2/report.html
#1010: https://gtfs-validator-results.mobilitydata.org/e3822ada-1028-4a96-ac69-e9b5498f6b2d/report.html
#1172: https://gtfs-validator-results.mobilitydata.org/2d8eda69-3ce3-4368-b25a-e8728bd31a58/report.html
#1171: https://gtfs-validator-results.mobilitydata.org/9105352d-8fdd-4022-bbd8-489a84f728b1/report.html
#1122: https://gtfs-validator-results.mobilitydata.org/311d3394-8fa6-41ff-932f-5d76777588d7/report.html
#1185: https://gtfs-validator-results.mobilitydata.org/30aa2cdb-d444-459f-8b83-053f3cd9bb92/report.html
#1184: https://gtfs-validator-results.mobilitydata.org/bcd8d0f3-f70f-44ac-82dd-34a56749496f/report.html