Error posting data to job: ('Connection aborted.', TimeoutError('The write operation timed out'))

[xplsek03]

For 36 qubit chem energy calculation (VQE) on QLM, I am getting (unsurprisingly):
Error posting data to job: ('Connection aborted.', TimeoutError('The write operation timed out'))

Here are the specs:

{'qubit_hamiltonian_terms': 189346, 'circuit_width': 36, 'circuit_depth': 1959885, 'circuit_2qubit_gates': 1976620, 'circuit_var_gates': 90984, 'vqe_variational_parameters': 4185}

I am aware that this job is large but before I plan some spatial reduction, I would like to know what kind of threshold there is for your setup, so I know to what extent I need to reduce - in the means of circuit depth etc. Do you have any benchmarks available?

Thanks.

[mnfarooqi]

Did you encounter the following error when running the job using the MQSS Qiskit Adapter? Could you please provide the date and time at which you encountered this issue, so that we can look into it?

For 36 qubit chem energy calculation (VQE) on QLM, I am getting (unsurprisingly): Error posting data to job: ('Connection aborted.', TimeoutError('The write operation timed out'))

Here are the specs:

{'qubit_hamiltonian_terms': 189346, 'circuit_width': 36, 'circuit_depth': 1959885, 'circuit_2qubit_gates': 1976620, 'circuit_var_gates': 90984, 'vqe_variational_parameters': 4185}

I am aware that this job is large but before I plan some spatial reduction, I would like to know what kind of threshold there is for your setup, so I know to what extent I need to reduce - in the means of circuit depth etc. Do you have any benchmarks available?

Thanks.

[xplsek03]

Did you encounter the following error when running the job using the MQSS Qiskit Adapter? Could you please provide the date and time at which you encountered this issue, so that we can look into it?

For 36 qubit chem energy calculation (VQE) on QLM, I am getting (unsurprisingly): Error posting data to job: ('Connection aborted.', TimeoutError('The write operation timed out'))
Here are the specs:
{'qubit_hamiltonian_terms': 189346, 'circuit_width': 36, 'circuit_depth': 1959885, 'circuit_2qubit_gates': 1976620, 'circuit_var_gates': 90984, 'vqe_variational_parameters': 4185}
I am aware that this job is large but before I plan some spatial reduction, I would like to know what kind of threshold there is for your setup, so I know to what extent I need to reduce - in the means of circuit depth etc. Do you have any benchmarks available?
Thanks.

Yes, this is for MQSS Qiskit Adapter. I think it was the huge job 262935, I am not entirely sure. I am positive this is due to circuit depth, QLM couldnt take such a circuit. It would be REALLY nice if you could share your insight of what is actually computable on your QLM, in terms of ham. terms, depth, gate count etc. I am aware that this really was an overkill, just need to find some reasonable threshold that is doable, and don't limit others that much.

[mnfarooqi]

Did you encounter the following error when running the job using the MQSS Qiskit Adapter? Could you please provide the date and time at which you encountered this issue, so that we can look into it?

For 36 qubit chem energy calculation (VQE) on QLM, I am getting (unsurprisingly): Error posting data to job: ('Connection aborted.', TimeoutError('The write operation timed out'))
Here are the specs:
{'qubit_hamiltonian_terms': 189346, 'circuit_width': 36, 'circuit_depth': 1959885, 'circuit_2qubit_gates': 1976620, 'circuit_var_gates': 90984, 'vqe_variational_parameters': 4185}
I am aware that this job is large but before I plan some spatial reduction, I would like to know what kind of threshold there is for your setup, so I know to what extent I need to reduce - in the means of circuit depth etc. Do you have any benchmarks available?
Thanks.

Yes, this is for MQSS Qiskit Adapter. I think it was the huge job 262935, I am not entirely sure. I am positive this is due to circuit depth, QLM couldnt take such a circuit. It would be REALLY nice if you could share your insight of what is actually computable on your QLM, in terms of ham. terms, depth, gate count etc. I am aware that this really was an overkill, just need to find some reasonable threshold that is doable, and don't limit others that much.

We don't have those kinds of numbers. We only know, in terms of number of qubits, that it can do vector simulation of the complete state up to 38 qubits for any circuit. The hardware specs are similar to Qaptiva 808, listed here.

[xplsek03]

Ok then, I will move to adaptive ansatze then. Thanks anyway.