Skip to content

[TASK] Extract method Selector::parseComponents - #1493

Merged
oliverklee merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
task/selector-parsecomponents
Feb 5, 2026
Merged

[TASK] Extract method Selector::parseComponents#1493
oliverklee merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
task/selector-parsecomponents

Conversation

@JakeQZ

@JakeQZ JakeQZ commented Feb 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This will allow the conversion of a selector string into an array of Selector\Component objects to also be used by the setSelector() method.

Part of #1325.

This will allow the conversion of a selector string into an array of
`Selector\Component` objects to also be used by the `setSelector()` method.

Part of #1325.
@JakeQZ
JakeQZ requested a review from oliverklee February 5, 2026 16:54
@JakeQZ JakeQZ self-assigned this Feb 5, 2026
@JakeQZ JakeQZ added the refactor For PRs that refactor code without changing functionality label Feb 5, 2026
@coveralls

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

coverage: 72.601% (+0.04%) from 72.562%
when pulling a94a306 on task/selector-parsecomponents
into 6f398f8 on main.

@JakeQZ

JakeQZ commented Feb 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

The new private method can be moved within the class definition as a separate PR - it's where it is now to make diffing easier for review.

@oliverklee oliverklee left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹

@oliverklee
oliverklee merged commit 9dd05ed into main Feb 5, 2026
24 checks passed
@oliverklee
oliverklee deleted the task/selector-parsecomponents branch February 5, 2026 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

refactor For PRs that refactor code without changing functionality

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants