fix evaluation of LHD rules

Luckily, the fix doesn't change any of the results.

Author: memo33

src/main/scala/scripts/RedundantAdjacenciesChecker.scala

@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ object RedundantAdjacenciesChecker {
     val rulesLhd = collection.mutable.Map.empty[EquivRule, Rule[IdTile]]
     val rulesShared = collection.mutable.Map.empty[EquivRule, Rule[IdTile]]
     val lookupRuleRhd: PartialFunction[EquivRule, Rule[IdTile]] = rulesShared.orElse(rulesRhd)  // the two maps should be disjoint
-    val lookupRuleLhd: PartialFunction[EquivRule, Rule[IdTile]] = rulesShared.orElse(rulesRhd)  // the two maps should be disjoint
+    val lookupRuleLhd: PartialFunction[EquivRule, Rule[IdTile]] = rulesShared.orElse(rulesLhd)  // the two maps should be disjoint
 
     LOGGER.info("caching all RUL2 code for RHD and LHD")
     Files.walk(Paths.get("Controller/RUL2")).forEach { path =>
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ object RedundantAdjacenciesChecker {
                 case Some((rule, RhdAndLhd)) =>
                   val b = isRedundantAdjacency(rule, lookupRuleRhd)
                   if (b != isRedundantAdjacency(rule, lookupRuleLhd)) {
-                    throw new AssertionError("Redundancies should be the same for RHD and LHD.")  // hopefully this will always be the case
+                    throw new AssertionError(s"Redundancies should be the same for RHD and LHD: $rule")  // hopefully this will always be the case
                   }
                   b
                 case None => false  // comments are not redundant