|
| 1 | +package com.sc4nam.scripts |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +import java.nio.file.{Files, Paths, Path} |
| 4 | +import com.sc4nam.module._ |
| 5 | +import io.github.memo33.metarules.meta.{RotFlip, Rule, EquivRule, IdTile} |
| 6 | +import RotFlip._ |
| 7 | +import syntax.IdTile |
| 8 | +import SanityChecker.{fileEndsWithNewline, linePatternIncludingNewlines} |
| 9 | +import Rul2Model.{iterateRulFiles, parseRuleWithRestrictedDriveside, Rhd, Lhd, RhdAndLhd, drivesideOfFile, applyRule} |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +/** Run with `SBT_OPTS="-Xmx2G" sbt "runMain com.sc4nam.scripts.RedundantAdjacenciesChecker"`. |
| 12 | + * Note that this increases the heap size for more memory. |
| 13 | + * Takes about 4 minutes. |
| 14 | + */ |
| 15 | +object RedundantAdjacenciesChecker { |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | + /** Scans the Controller/RUL2/ folder for adjancy RUL2 code that is |
| 18 | + * redundant with the DLL RUL2 engine. |
| 19 | + * |
| 20 | + * The respective lines are commented out and tagged as "; redundant-adjacency". |
| 21 | + * |
| 22 | + * Make sure all your changes to files are committed to git beforehand, |
| 23 | + * as this modifies files in place. |
| 24 | + * |
| 25 | + * Afterwards, you need to manually look through the changes and remove the |
| 26 | + * redundant code. |
| 27 | + */ |
| 28 | + def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = { |
| 29 | + val rul2 = Rul2Model.load(Paths.get("Controller/RUL2")) |
| 30 | + checkRedundantAdjacencies(rul2) |
| 31 | + } |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | + def checkRedundantAdjacencies(rul2: Rul2Model): Unit = { |
| 34 | + LOGGER.info("Searching for redundant adjacencies in RUL2 code") |
| 35 | + iterateRulFiles(Paths.get("Controller/RUL2")).foreach { path => |
| 36 | + val drivesideFile = drivesideOfFile(path) |
| 37 | + val tmpPath = path.resolveSibling(path.getFileName().toString() + ".tmp") |
| 38 | + val endsWithNewline = fileEndsWithNewline(path) // attempt to preserve missing newlines at end of files to avoid noise |
| 39 | + scala.util.Using.resources( |
| 40 | + new java.util.Scanner(path.toFile(), "UTF-8").useDelimiter(linePatternIncludingNewlines), |
| 41 | + new java.io.PrintWriter(tmpPath.toFile(), "UTF-8") |
| 42 | + ) { (lineScanner, printer) => |
| 43 | + while (lineScanner.hasNext()) { |
| 44 | + val line = lineScanner.next() |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | + val redundant = |
| 47 | + parseRuleWithRestrictedDriveside(line, drivesideFile) match { |
| 48 | + case Some((rule, Rhd)) => isRedundantAdjacency(rule, rul2.lookupRuleRhd) |
| 49 | + case Some((rule, Lhd)) => isRedundantAdjacency(rule, rul2.lookupRuleLhd) |
| 50 | + case Some((rule, RhdAndLhd)) => |
| 51 | + val b = isRedundantAdjacency(rule, rul2.lookupRuleRhd) |
| 52 | + require( |
| 53 | + b == isRedundantAdjacency(rule, rul2.lookupRuleLhd), |
| 54 | + s"Redundancies should be the same for RHD and LHD: $rule" // hopefully this will always be the case |
| 55 | + ) |
| 56 | + b |
| 57 | + case None => false // comments are not redundant |
| 58 | + } |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | + if (redundant) { |
| 61 | + printer.println(s";${line.stripLineEnd}; redundant-adjacency") // comments out the line |
| 62 | + } else { |
| 63 | + printer.print(line) // preserving original linebreaks |
| 64 | + } |
| 65 | + } |
| 66 | + } |
| 67 | + Files.move(tmpPath, path, java.nio.file.StandardCopyOption.REPLACE_EXISTING) |
| 68 | + } |
| 69 | + } |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | + val orthogonalSurrogateTiles = Seq( |
| 72 | + IdTile(0x00004B00, R1F0), // Road |
| 73 | + IdTile(0x57000000, R1F0), // Dirtroad |
| 74 | + IdTile(0x05004B00, R1F0), // Street |
| 75 | + IdTile(0x5D540000, R1F0), // Rail |
| 76 | + IdTile(0x08031500, R1F0), // Lightrail |
| 77 | + IdTile(0x09004B00, R1F0), // Onewayroad (TODO or 0x5f940300?) |
| 78 | + IdTile(0x04006100, R3F0), // Avenue |
| 79 | + IdTile(0x0D031500, R1F0), // Monorail |
| 80 | + ).flatMap(t => Seq(t, t * R2F0)) |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | + val diagonalSurrogateTiles = Seq( |
| 83 | + (IdTile(0x00000A00, R1F0), IdTile(0x00000A00, R3F0)), // Road |
| 84 | + (IdTile(0x57000200, R1F0), IdTile(0x57000200, R3F0)), // Dirtroad |
| 85 | + (IdTile(0x5F500200, R1F0), IdTile(0x5F500200, R3F0)), // Street |
| 86 | + (IdTile(0x5D540100, R1F0), IdTile(0x5D540100, R3F0)), // Rail |
| 87 | + (IdTile(0x08001A00, R1F0), IdTile(0x08001A00, R3F0)), // Lightrail |
| 88 | + (IdTile(0x09000A00, R1F0), IdTile(0x09000A00, R3F0)), // Onewayroad (TODO or 0x5f94....?) |
| 89 | + (IdTile(0x04000200, R2F0), IdTile(0x04003800, R0F0)), // Avenue~SW | Avenue~SharedDiagLeft |
| 90 | + (IdTile(0x04000200, R2F0), IdTile(0x04003800, R2F0)), // Avenue~SW | Avenue~SharedDiagLeft (here we probably need this extra rotation to remove corresponding RUL2 code) |
| 91 | + (IdTile(0x04003800, R0F0), IdTile(0x04000200, R0F0)), // Avenue~SharedDiagLeft | Avenue~SW |
| 92 | + (IdTile(0x04003800, R2F0), IdTile(0x04000200, R0F0)), // Avenue~SharedDiagLeft | Avenue~SW (here we probably need this extra rotation to remove corresponding RUL2 code) |
| 93 | + (IdTile(0x0D001A00, R1F0), IdTile(0x0D001A00, R3F0)), // Monorail |
| 94 | + ).flatMap { case (a,b) => Seq(true, false).map { southBound => |
| 95 | + val rot = if (southBound) R0F0 else R1F0 |
| 96 | + (a * rot, b * rot, southBound) |
| 97 | + }} |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | + /** Checks if adjacency overrides a -> b and b -> c exist (in that order and |
| 100 | + * direction) (where b is surrogate tile) and matches expected result |
| 101 | + * aExpected, cExpected. |
| 102 | + */ |
| 103 | + def connectingOrthOverridesExist(lookupRule: PartialFunction[EquivRule, Rule[IdTile]], a: IdTile, b: IdTile, c: IdTile, aExpected: IdTile, cExpected: IdTile): Boolean = { |
| 104 | + Rul2Model.evaluateRulesOnce(lookupRule, a, b) match { |
| 105 | + case Some((a1, b1)) if a1 == a && a1.id != b1.id => |
| 106 | + Rul2Model.evaluateRulesOnce(lookupRule, b1, c) match { |
| 107 | + case Some((b2, c2)) if b2 == b1 && b2.id != c2.id && c2 != c => |
| 108 | + // found two overrides connecting a to c, so check if result of their application is as expected |
| 109 | + a1 == aExpected && c2 == cExpected |
| 110 | + case _ => false |
| 111 | + } |
| 112 | + case _ => false |
| 113 | + } |
| 114 | + } |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | + /** Checks if adjacency overrides a -> b and b*rot -> c*rot and c -> d exist |
| 117 | + * and matches expected result aExpected, dExpected. |
| 118 | + * Here, b and c are diagonal surrogate tiles rotated for southbound or |
| 119 | + * northbound direction. |
| 120 | + */ |
| 121 | + def connectingDiagOverridesExist(lookupRule: PartialFunction[EquivRule, Rule[IdTile]], a: IdTile, b: IdTile, c: IdTile, d: IdTile, southBound: Boolean, aExpected: IdTile, dExpected: IdTile): Boolean = { |
| 122 | + Rul2Model.evaluateRulesOnce(lookupRule, a, b) match { |
| 123 | + case Some((a1, b1)) if a1 == a && a1.id != b1.id => |
| 124 | + val rot = if (southBound) R3F0 else R1F0 |
| 125 | + Rul2Model.evaluateRulesOnce(lookupRule, b1 * rot, c * rot) match { |
| 126 | + case Some((b2rot, c2rot)) => |
| 127 | + val b2 = b2rot * (R0F0 / rot) |
| 128 | + val c2 = c2rot * (R0F0 / rot) |
| 129 | + if (b2 == b1 && c2 != c) { |
| 130 | + Rul2Model.evaluateRulesOnce(lookupRule, c2, d) match { |
| 131 | + case Some((c3, d3)) if c3 == c2 && d3.id != c3.id && d3.id != b2.id && d3 != d => |
| 132 | + a1 == aExpected && d3 == dExpected |
| 133 | + case _ => false |
| 134 | + } |
| 135 | + } else { |
| 136 | + false |
| 137 | + } |
| 138 | + case _ => false |
| 139 | + } |
| 140 | + case _ => false |
| 141 | + } |
| 142 | + } |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | + def isRedundantAdjacency(rule: Rule[IdTile], lookupRule: PartialFunction[EquivRule, Rule[IdTile]]): Boolean = { |
| 145 | + val a = rule(0) |
| 146 | + def checkOrth() = { |
| 147 | + val c = rule(1) |
| 148 | + orthogonalSurrogateTiles.exists { b => |
| 149 | + if (b.id == a.id || b.id == c.id) { // this would depend on the same rule |
| 150 | + false |
| 151 | + } else { |
| 152 | + (connectingOrthOverridesExist(lookupRule, a, b, c, rule(2), rule(3)) // a -> b -> c |
| 153 | + || connectingOrthOverridesExist(lookupRule, c * R2F0, b * R2F0, a * R2F0, rule(3) * R2F0, rule(2) * R2F0)) // c -> b -> a |
| 154 | + } |
| 155 | + } |
| 156 | + } |
| 157 | + def checkDiag() = { |
| 158 | + val d = rule(1) |
| 159 | + diagonalSurrogateTiles.exists { case (b, c, southBound) => |
| 160 | + if (c.id == a.id || b.id == d.id) { // this would depend on the same rule |
| 161 | + false |
| 162 | + } else { |
| 163 | + (connectingDiagOverridesExist(lookupRule, a, b, c, d, southBound, rule(2), rule(3)) // a -> b -> c -> d |
| 164 | + || connectingDiagOverridesExist(lookupRule, d * R2F0, c * R2F0, b * R2F0, a * R2F0, southBound, rule(3) * R2F0, rule(2) * R2F0)) // d -> c -> b -> a |
| 165 | + } |
| 166 | + } |
| 167 | + } |
| 168 | + checkOrth() || checkDiag() |
| 169 | + } |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | +} |
0 commit comments