Hi, I was just looking at the repo and saw that the default branch was now main. I wondered if this was a deliberate choice? I think the original design decision was that develop is the default branch, which is used as a feature staging. Once a point release candidate is minted and approved, this is then merged with main. That way main is always the latest stable release. This is fairly standard practice in OSS. Just pointing this out as one a recent PR fixing the examples I had already done and merged with develop.
Is a CONTRIBUTION.md file needed to set out how things are expected to be done?
Hi, I was just looking at the repo and saw that the default branch was now main. I wondered if this was a deliberate choice? I think the original design decision was that
developis the default branch, which is used as a feature staging. Once a point release candidate is minted and approved, this is then merged withmain. That waymainis always the latest stable release. This is fairly standard practice in OSS. Just pointing this out as one a recent PR fixing the examples I had already done and merged withdevelop.Is a CONTRIBUTION.md file needed to set out how things are expected to be done?