Skip to content

Academic paper: outline, venue, benchmark methodology #76

Description

@erfanjazebnikoo

README.md's Citation section references a paper as "once published" but no
outline or venue has been decided yet. This tracks getting that started:
outline, target venue, and confirming the benchmark methodology
(cross-platform validation results already collected under
validation/results/) is presentable as-is or needs additional controlled
experiments.

Promoted from backlog after outside review (Sepand): the algorithms and
validation methodology are publication-grade, provided two things land
first, both tracked separately:

  • Citation audit of the crypto modules (see the new "Citation audit" issue)
  • An AI-assisted-development disclosure section suitable for a journal
    submission, distinct from CONTRIBUTING.md's dev-facing note (see the new
    "AI-assisted development disclosure section" issue)

#87 (NTT/PQClean cross-validation) is the template for the validation
rigor this paper will describe.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    documentationImprovements or additions to documentation

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions