Skip to content

Standardize analysis_start_year, ATB year, and installation period #99

@johnjasa

Description

@johnjasa

@jaredthomas68 said: I'm not sure I agree with this comment. The profast model also takes installation time, which we are treating as the difference between ATB year and analysis start year. I think you should make an issue for further discussion if you disagree.

          before - the analysis start year was hardcoded as ``atb_year + 1`` for LCOE calc and ``atb_year + 2`` for the LCOH calc - neither of which are related to the installation period. The _operation start year_ is ``operation_start_year = analysis start year + (installation_months/12)`` - this is the calculation done in ProFAST.

Originally posted by @elenya-grant in #79 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions