Hello,
Thank you so much for creating this great pipeline! I have been trying to use FragPipe for protein identification in metaproteomics data. The approach I wanted to use is the "Sectioning and Database Enrichment Approach," in which I have to create a small subset of my reference database and search for proteins in each subset without using any FDR. Then, I will create a final database using all the proteins identified in the primary search and rerun FragPipe, this time with a 0.01 false discovery rate (FDR). My question is, how do I use FragPipe without considering the false discovery rate (FDR) during the primary search?
The approach I am trying to use is explained in the paper: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00260
Thanks so much!
Vinod
Hello,
Thank you so much for creating this great pipeline! I have been trying to use FragPipe for protein identification in metaproteomics data. The approach I wanted to use is the "Sectioning and Database Enrichment Approach," in which I have to create a small subset of my reference database and search for proteins in each subset without using any FDR. Then, I will create a final database using all the proteins identified in the primary search and rerun FragPipe, this time with a 0.01 false discovery rate (FDR). My question is, how do I use FragPipe without considering the false discovery rate (FDR) during the primary search?
The approach I am trying to use is explained in the paper: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00260
Thanks so much!
Vinod