-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
Web Host Survey
The following information is out-of-date, but kept for historical reference.
- Decent cost
- Good scaling capabilities
- Large level of control over the server
- Allows use of websockets
- Dynamically-priced (AKA lots of usage translates into lots of cost)
- Distributing remote access to others is a bit of a pain
- Not fully controlled by owner/lessee
- Performance is fairly poor and inconsistent
"Micro" instances are insufficient for Teletortoise; must be at least "Small". A "Small" instance managed to handle several demos, including one at CCL-All that involved more than a dozen different users connected to it.
- Good scaling capabilities
- Allows use of websockets
- Allows use of Play
- Cost is twice that of Linode
We've yet to ever try running a server on Clever Cloud and seeing how it goes, so performance and reliability are currently unknowns.
Does not support websockets.
Does not support Play Framework 2.x. I'm aware of the existence of this, but it has not always proven reliable; last time I tried to use it, it repeatedly failed to deploy my application. Also, I find the long wait times for deployment and the lack of control over the server to be annoying. Currently, I'm preferring a more-configurable setup.
Formerly didn't support websockets. It now does, but hasn't yet been evaluated by us.
- Decent cost
- Great performance
- Good scaling capabilities
- Virtually absolute control over the server
- Easy to distribute access to others
- Allows use of websockets
- Jason is not a good sysadmin
- Free!
- Great performance
- Virtually absolute control over the server
- Easy to distribute access to others
- Allows use of websockets
- Scalability of solution is unclear