chore: revert back to cargo

Author: WiseMrMusa

.github/workflows/benchmark.yml

@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ jobs:
       # TODO(template) update the bench command if you use a different
       # benchmark harness or need to pass extra flags
       - name: Run benchmarks
-        run: cargo bench --workspace 2>&1 | tee benchmark-output.txt
+        run: cargo bench -p template_crate --bench benchmark -- --output-format bencher 2>&1 | tee benchmark-output.txt
 
       # On PRs: compare against cached baseline to detect regressions
       - name: Download previous benchmark data
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ jobs:
         with:
           # TODO(template) update the name to match your project
           name: Benchmark
-          tool: "criterion"
+          tool: "cargo"
           output-file-path: benchmark-output.txt
           external-data-json-path: ./cache/benchmark-data.json
           alert-threshold: "130%"
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ jobs:
         with:
           # TODO(template) update the name to match your project
           name: Rust Template Benchmark
-          tool: "criterion"
+          tool: "cargo"
           output-file-path: benchmark-output.txt
           gh-pages-branch: gh-pages
           benchmark-data-dir-path: dev/bench

benchmark-output.txt

@@ -1,63 +1,11 @@
-    Finished `bench` profile [optimized] target(s) in 0.16s
-     Running unittests src/bin/addition.rs (target/release/deps/addition-fa126c1aa49f239a)
-
-running 0 tests
-
-test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s
-
-     Running unittests src/lib.rs (target/release/deps/template_crate-2cbe50dadcac1ec1)
-
-running 4 tests
-test tests::addition_bound_check ... ignored
-test tests::addition_edge_case ... ignored
-test tests::addition_of_bounded ... ignored
-test tests::addition_proptest ... ignored
-
-test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 4 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s
-
+    Finished `bench` profile [optimized] target(s) in 0.03s
      Running benches/benchmark.rs (target/release/deps/benchmark-32b0b63a53acd575)
 Gnuplot not found, using plotters backend
-Benchmarking add_small_integers valid
-Benchmarking add_small_integers valid: Warming up for 3.0000 s
-Benchmarking add_small_integers valid: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0000 s (6.1B iterations)
-Benchmarking add_small_integers valid: Analyzing
-add_small_integers valid
-                        time:   [825.17 ps 827.48 ps 829.74 ps]
-                        change: [-1.0534% -0.7769% -0.4984%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
-                        Change within noise threshold.
-Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
-  1 (1.00%) low mild
-  1 (1.00%) high mild
+test add_small_integers valid ... bench:           0 ns/iter (+/- 0)
 
-Benchmarking add_small_integers bound check
-Benchmarking add_small_integers bound check: Warming up for 3.0000 s
-Benchmarking add_small_integers bound check: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0000 s (4.5B iterations)
-Benchmarking add_small_integers bound check: Analyzing
-add_small_integers bound check
-                        time:   [1.0951 ns 1.0977 ns 1.1004 ns]
-                        change: [-1.0440% -0.7332% -0.4399%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
-                        Change within noise threshold.
-Found 2 outliers among 100 measurements (2.00%)
-  2 (2.00%) high mild
+test add_small_integers bound check ... bench:           1 ns/iter (+/- 0)
 
-Benchmarking sub_small_integers valid
-Benchmarking sub_small_integers valid: Warming up for 3.0000 s
-Benchmarking sub_small_integers valid: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0000 s (6.1B iterations)
-Benchmarking sub_small_integers valid: Analyzing
-sub_small_integers valid
-                        time:   [822.88 ps 825.16 ps 827.40 ps]
-                        change: [-1.9918% -1.7085% -1.4029%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
-                        Performance has improved.
-Found 5 outliers among 100 measurements (5.00%)
-  3 (3.00%) low mild
-  2 (2.00%) high mild
+test sub_small_integers valid ... bench:           0 ns/iter (+/- 0)
 
-Benchmarking sub_small_integers bound check
-Benchmarking sub_small_integers bound check: Warming up for 3.0000 s
-Benchmarking sub_small_integers bound check: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0000 s (6.0B iterations)
-Benchmarking sub_small_integers bound check: Analyzing
-sub_small_integers bound check
-                        time:   [824.80 ps 826.50 ps 828.18 ps]
-                        change: [-1.8074% -1.4830% -1.1346%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
-                        Performance has improved.
+test sub_small_integers bound check ... bench:           0 ns/iter (+/- 0)