Automatic retirement of @Ekleog#74
Conversation
|
This is one of the cases mentioned in #73 (comment), where the retirement script does not count squash and rebase merges from ~ the first half of the year. There were 16 of these until June, so quite a lot. @Ekleog also recently voiced their intent to keep their maintainer entry despite currently lower activity. @Ekleog do you intend to use your commit bit with your lower activity right now or should we remove it for now? You can always get it back in case you are more active again, of course. We can also just close the PR and your commit bit will be extended for 1 year, before it will be checked again. |
|
@wolfgangwalther I can confirm that for now I'd like to keep the commit bit to make maintainership simpler! We can reconsider in one year, depending on how my time and energy for NixOS projects will evolve by then. |
This is an automated PR to retire @Ekleog as a Nixpkgs committer because they have not used their commit access in the past year.
@Ekleog: You can make a comment stating why you believe your commit access should be kept. Otherwise, this PR will be merged and implemented in one month.
Note
Commit access is not required for most forms of contributing, including being a maintainer and reviewing PRs. It is only needed for things that require
writepermissions to Nixpkgs, such as merging PRs.