|
| 1 | +//! pgwire wire-level tests for per-connection tenant scoping and Trust-mode |
| 2 | +//! identity resolution. |
| 3 | +//! |
| 4 | +//! Covers the class of bug where the pgwire handler's planning context is |
| 5 | +//! built once with a fixed tenant id, so queries from tenant-scoped users |
| 6 | +//! plan against the wrong tenant's catalog. Also covers Trust-mode accepting |
| 7 | +//! usernames that were never created as if they were superusers. |
| 8 | +
|
| 9 | +mod common; |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +use common::pgwire_harness::TestServer; |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +/// Helper: superuser-side bootstrap — create a tenant and a tenant-scoped |
| 14 | +/// user, plus a collection owned by that tenant. The harness's default |
| 15 | +/// connection is Trust/superuser (tenant 1) and is used for setup. |
| 16 | +async fn bootstrap_tenant_user(server: &TestServer, user: &str, collection: &str) { |
| 17 | + server |
| 18 | + .exec("CREATE TENANT acme ID 2") |
| 19 | + .await |
| 20 | + .expect("CREATE TENANT"); |
| 21 | + server |
| 22 | + .exec(&format!( |
| 23 | + "CREATE USER {user} WITH PASSWORD 'x' ROLE readwrite TENANT 2" |
| 24 | + )) |
| 25 | + .await |
| 26 | + .expect("CREATE USER"); |
| 27 | + // Create the collection as the tenant-scoped user so ownership lands on |
| 28 | + // tenant 2. This itself exercises the DDL path, which already reads |
| 29 | + // identity.tenant_id correctly. |
| 30 | + let (svc, _h) = server |
| 31 | + .connect_as(user, "x") |
| 32 | + .await |
| 33 | + .expect("tenant user connect"); |
| 34 | + svc.simple_query(&format!( |
| 35 | + "CREATE COLLECTION {collection} TYPE DOCUMENT STRICT \ |
| 36 | + (id TEXT PRIMARY KEY, content TEXT NOT NULL)" |
| 37 | + )) |
| 38 | + .await |
| 39 | + .expect("tenant user CREATE COLLECTION"); |
| 40 | + drop(svc); |
| 41 | +} |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +/// Run a simple query under a freshly opened tenant-user connection and |
| 44 | +/// return either the rows (first column) or the server error message. |
| 45 | +async fn query_as(server: &TestServer, user: &str, sql: &str) -> Result<Vec<String>, String> { |
| 46 | + let (client, _h) = server.connect_as(user, "x").await?; |
| 47 | + match client.simple_query(sql).await { |
| 48 | + Ok(msgs) => { |
| 49 | + let mut rows = Vec::new(); |
| 50 | + for msg in msgs { |
| 51 | + if let tokio_postgres::SimpleQueryMessage::Row(row) = msg { |
| 52 | + rows.push(row.get(0).unwrap_or("").to_string()); |
| 53 | + } |
| 54 | + } |
| 55 | + Ok(rows) |
| 56 | + } |
| 57 | + Err(e) => Err(pg_err(&e)), |
| 58 | + } |
| 59 | +} |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +fn pg_err(e: &tokio_postgres::Error) -> String { |
| 62 | + if let Some(db) = e.as_db_error() { |
| 63 | + format!("{}: {}", db.code().code(), db.message()) |
| 64 | + } else { |
| 65 | + format!("{e:?}") |
| 66 | + } |
| 67 | +} |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +// ── #29: tenant-scoped planning via shared query_ctx ─────────────────── |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +#[tokio::test] |
| 72 | +async fn tenant_user_can_select_own_collection() { |
| 73 | + let server = TestServer::start().await; |
| 74 | + bootstrap_tenant_user(&server, "svc_sel", "t2_sel").await; |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | + let (svc, _h) = server.connect_as("svc_sel", "x").await.unwrap(); |
| 77 | + svc.simple_query("INSERT INTO t2_sel (id, content) VALUES ('a', 'alpha')") |
| 78 | + .await |
| 79 | + .expect("INSERT under tenant user"); |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | + let rows = query_as(&server, "svc_sel", "SELECT id FROM t2_sel") |
| 82 | + .await |
| 83 | + .expect("SELECT under tenant user must not fail with 'unknown table'"); |
| 84 | + assert_eq!(rows.len(), 1, "expected 1 row, got {rows:?}"); |
| 85 | + assert!( |
| 86 | + rows[0].contains("\"a\""), |
| 87 | + "row should contain id 'a': {rows:?}" |
| 88 | + ); |
| 89 | +} |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +#[tokio::test] |
| 92 | +async fn tenant_user_can_insert_into_own_collection() { |
| 93 | + let server = TestServer::start().await; |
| 94 | + bootstrap_tenant_user(&server, "svc_ins", "t2_ins").await; |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | + let (svc, _h) = server.connect_as("svc_ins", "x").await.unwrap(); |
| 97 | + svc.simple_query("INSERT INTO t2_ins (id, content) VALUES ('k', 'v')") |
| 98 | + .await |
| 99 | + .expect("INSERT must succeed for tenant-owned collection"); |
| 100 | +} |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +#[tokio::test] |
| 103 | +async fn tenant_user_can_update_own_collection() { |
| 104 | + let server = TestServer::start().await; |
| 105 | + bootstrap_tenant_user(&server, "svc_upd", "t2_upd").await; |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | + let (svc, _h) = server.connect_as("svc_upd", "x").await.unwrap(); |
| 108 | + svc.simple_query("INSERT INTO t2_upd (id, content) VALUES ('a', 'old')") |
| 109 | + .await |
| 110 | + .unwrap(); |
| 111 | + svc.simple_query("UPDATE t2_upd SET content = 'new' WHERE id = 'a'") |
| 112 | + .await |
| 113 | + .expect("UPDATE must not fail with 'unknown table'"); |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | + let rows = query_as( |
| 116 | + &server, |
| 117 | + "svc_upd", |
| 118 | + "SELECT content FROM t2_upd WHERE id = 'a'", |
| 119 | + ) |
| 120 | + .await |
| 121 | + .unwrap(); |
| 122 | + assert_eq!(rows.len(), 1); |
| 123 | + assert!( |
| 124 | + rows[0].contains("\"new\""), |
| 125 | + "row should reflect updated content: {rows:?}" |
| 126 | + ); |
| 127 | +} |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +#[tokio::test] |
| 130 | +async fn tenant_user_can_delete_from_own_collection() { |
| 131 | + let server = TestServer::start().await; |
| 132 | + bootstrap_tenant_user(&server, "svc_del", "t2_del").await; |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | + let (svc, _h) = server.connect_as("svc_del", "x").await.unwrap(); |
| 135 | + svc.simple_query("INSERT INTO t2_del (id, content) VALUES ('a', 'x')") |
| 136 | + .await |
| 137 | + .unwrap(); |
| 138 | + svc.simple_query("DELETE FROM t2_del WHERE id = 'a'") |
| 139 | + .await |
| 140 | + .expect("DELETE must not fail with 'unknown table'"); |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | + let rows = query_as(&server, "svc_del", "SELECT id FROM t2_del") |
| 143 | + .await |
| 144 | + .unwrap(); |
| 145 | + assert!(rows.is_empty(), "row should be deleted, got {rows:?}"); |
| 146 | +} |
| 147 | + |
| 148 | +#[tokio::test] |
| 149 | +async fn tenant_user_prepared_select_resolves_own_collection() { |
| 150 | + // Extended protocol goes through NodeDbQueryParser::parse_sql, which |
| 151 | + // builds its own OriginCatalog with a hardcoded tenant id. A tenant-2 |
| 152 | + // user must still be able to prepare and execute a statement against |
| 153 | + // a tenant-2 collection. |
| 154 | + let server = TestServer::start().await; |
| 155 | + bootstrap_tenant_user(&server, "svc_prep", "t2_prep").await; |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | + let (svc, _h) = server.connect_as("svc_prep", "x").await.unwrap(); |
| 158 | + svc.simple_query("INSERT INTO t2_prep (id, content) VALUES ('a', 'alpha')") |
| 159 | + .await |
| 160 | + .unwrap(); |
| 161 | + |
| 162 | + // `prepare` drives Parse + Describe through NodeDbQueryParser::parse_sql, |
| 163 | + // which constructs an OriginCatalog. Before the fix this catalog was |
| 164 | + // hardcoded to tenant 1 and could not see tenant-2 collections — |
| 165 | + // `prepare` would surface the server's "unknown table" error. |
| 166 | + svc.prepare("SELECT content FROM t2_prep WHERE id = 'a'") |
| 167 | + .await |
| 168 | + .expect("prepare must resolve tenant-owned collection via parser.rs"); |
| 169 | +} |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | +#[tokio::test] |
| 172 | +async fn tenant_user_cannot_see_other_tenants_collection_as_empty() { |
| 173 | + // Asymmetric-isolation guard: a tenant-2 user issuing SELECT against a |
| 174 | + // tenant-1 collection must NOT silently return an empty result set. |
| 175 | + // The correct behavior is the same "unknown table" a cross-tenant |
| 176 | + // planner produces the other direction. Silent empty is a data-shape |
| 177 | + // leak vector even though no rows cross. |
| 178 | + let server = TestServer::start().await; |
| 179 | + server |
| 180 | + .exec( |
| 181 | + "CREATE COLLECTION t1_only TYPE DOCUMENT STRICT \ |
| 182 | + (id TEXT PRIMARY KEY, secret TEXT NOT NULL)", |
| 183 | + ) |
| 184 | + .await |
| 185 | + .unwrap(); |
| 186 | + server |
| 187 | + .exec("INSERT INTO t1_only (id, secret) VALUES ('a', 'classified')") |
| 188 | + .await |
| 189 | + .unwrap(); |
| 190 | + |
| 191 | + server.exec("CREATE TENANT acme ID 2").await.unwrap(); |
| 192 | + server |
| 193 | + .exec("CREATE USER svc_xtn WITH PASSWORD 'x' ROLE readwrite TENANT 2") |
| 194 | + .await |
| 195 | + .unwrap(); |
| 196 | + |
| 197 | + let result = query_as(&server, "svc_xtn", "SELECT secret FROM t1_only").await; |
| 198 | + match result { |
| 199 | + Err(msg) => { |
| 200 | + assert!( |
| 201 | + msg.to_lowercase().contains("unknown table"), |
| 202 | + "expected 'unknown table' error, got: {msg}" |
| 203 | + ); |
| 204 | + } |
| 205 | + Ok(rows) => panic!( |
| 206 | + "tenant-2 user must not see tenant-1 collection via silent empty result; got rows={rows:?}" |
| 207 | + ), |
| 208 | + } |
| 209 | +} |
| 210 | + |
| 211 | +// ── #30: Trust-mode identity resolution ──────────────────────────────── |
| 212 | + |
| 213 | +#[tokio::test] |
| 214 | +async fn trust_mode_rejects_unknown_username() { |
| 215 | + // Under Trust mode NodeDB skips password verification, but it must |
| 216 | + // still resolve the connecting username against the credential store. |
| 217 | + // Accepting a fabricated username silently promotes arbitrary clients |
| 218 | + // to tenant-1 superuser (see core.rs resolve_identity fallback). |
| 219 | + let server = TestServer::start().await; |
| 220 | + |
| 221 | + let result = server |
| 222 | + .connect_as("nosuchuser_ever_created", "anything") |
| 223 | + .await; |
| 224 | + assert!( |
| 225 | + result.is_err(), |
| 226 | + "Trust mode must reject a username that was never CREATE USER'd; got an accepted connection" |
| 227 | + ); |
| 228 | +} |
| 229 | + |
| 230 | +#[tokio::test] |
| 231 | +async fn trust_mode_unknown_user_cannot_run_superuser_ddl() { |
| 232 | + // Defense-in-depth regression guard for the same root cause: even if |
| 233 | + // a connection is somehow permitted, an unknown username MUST NOT be |
| 234 | + // silently fabricated as a superuser identity capable of tenant/user |
| 235 | + // management DDL. Today core.rs sets `is_superuser: true` in the |
| 236 | + // fallback branch, so `CREATE USER` from a fabricated name succeeds. |
| 237 | + let server = TestServer::start().await; |
| 238 | + |
| 239 | + let Ok((client, _h)) = server.connect_as("ghost_admin", "anything").await else { |
| 240 | + // If connect_as is already rejected by the prior test's fix, that |
| 241 | + // is a strictly stronger guarantee — the bug is still captured. |
| 242 | + return; |
| 243 | + }; |
| 244 | + |
| 245 | + let result = client |
| 246 | + .simple_query("CREATE USER mallory WITH PASSWORD 'y' ROLE readwrite TENANT 1") |
| 247 | + .await; |
| 248 | + assert!( |
| 249 | + result.is_err(), |
| 250 | + "unknown Trust-mode user must not be granted superuser privileges; CREATE USER succeeded" |
| 251 | + ); |
| 252 | + if let Err(e) = result { |
| 253 | + let msg = pg_err(&e); |
| 254 | + assert!( |
| 255 | + msg.contains("42501") || msg.to_lowercase().contains("permission"), |
| 256 | + "expected a permission-denied error, got: {msg}" |
| 257 | + ); |
| 258 | + } |
| 259 | +} |
0 commit comments