Skip to content

Fix typo in JWT key cracking explanation#556

Open
parag25mcf10022 wants to merge 2 commits into
OWASP:masterfrom
parag25mcf10022:patch-2
Open

Fix typo in JWT key cracking explanation#556
parag25mcf10022 wants to merge 2 commits into
OWASP:masterfrom
parag25mcf10022:patch-2

Conversation

@parag25mcf10022

@parag25mcf10022 parag25mcf10022 commented Jun 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 23, 2026 12:49
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Have you followed the contributions guideance? Content PRs should generally be made against the the source repo OWASP/wstg.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the JWT testing guidance documentation by correcting wording in the “Weak HMAC Keys” section, improving clarity of the key-cracking explanation.

Changes:

  • Fixes a typo (“they key” → “the key”) in the weak HMAC key cracking sentence.
  • Adjusts the affected line to ensure the corrected text is reflected in the document.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

If the application is using off-the-shelf or open source software, the first step should be go investigate the code, and see whether there is default HMAC signing key that is used.

If there isn't a default, then it may be possible to crack guess or brute-force they key. The simplest way to do this is to use the [crackjwt.py](https://github.com/Sjord/jwtcrack) script, which simply requires the JWT and a dictionary file.
If there isn't a default, then it may be possible to crack guess or brute-force the key. The simplest way to do this is to use the [crackjwt.py](https://github.com/Sjord/jwtcrack) script, which simply requires the JWT and a dictionary file.
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants