Skip to content

[PowerPoint](tutorial) Updates to improve engagement#5769

Open
davidchesnut wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
davech-ppt-tutorial-update
Open

[PowerPoint](tutorial) Updates to improve engagement#5769
davidchesnut wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
davech-ppt-tutorial-update

Conversation

@davidchesnut

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Just some changes to improve engagement on this article.

@davidchesnut davidchesnut requested a review from AlexJerabek May 19, 2026 22:42
@learn-build-service-prod

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit d2eaf0d:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
docs/tutorials/powerpoint-tutorial-vs.md ✅Succeeded View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@learn-build-service-prod

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PoliCheck Scan Report

The following report lists PoliCheck issues in PR files. Before you merge the PR, you must fix all severity-1 and severity-2 issues. The AI Review Details column lists suggestions for either removing or replacing the terms. If you find a false positive result, mention it in a PR comment and include this text: #policheck-false-positive. This feedback helps reduce false positives in future scans.

✅ No issues found

More information about PoliCheck

Information: PoliCheck | Severity Guidance | Term
For any questions: Try searching the learn.microsoft.com contributor guides or post your question in the Learn support channel.

@AlexJerabek AlexJerabek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving with a suggestion (no re-review needed).

ms.service: powerpoint
#Customer intent: As a developer, I want to build a PowerPoint add-in that can interact with content in a PowerPoint document.
ms.localizationpriority: high
ai-usage: ai-assisted

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that it's only some grammar changes, I don't think this tag applies. All the code and step-by-step logic is still purely human-authored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants