|
1 | 1 | # Decadal Master Implementation Plan: Sentinel AI Governance (2026–2035) |
2 | 2 |
|
3 | 3 | ## 1. Executive Summary |
4 | | -This document outlines the decadal implementation strategy for the **Sentinel AI Governance Stack v2.4**, **Omni-Sentinel Mesh v4.0**, and related AGI/ASI governance components across Global Systemically Important Financial Institutions (G-SIFIs) and Fortune 500 financial institutions. The plan ensures institutional resilience, regulatory compliance, and systemic stability in the era of advancing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and Artificial Superintelligence (ASI). |
| 4 | +This document outlines the decadal implementation strategy for the |
| 5 | +**Sentinel AI Governance Stack v2.4**, **Omni-Sentinel Mesh v4.0**, and related |
| 6 | +AGI/ASI governance components across Global Systemically Important Financial |
| 7 | +Institutions (G-SIFIs) and Fortune 500 financial institutions. The plan |
| 8 | +ensures institutional resilience, regulatory compliance, and systemic |
| 9 | +stability in the era of advancing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and |
| 10 | +Artificial Superintelligence (ASI). |
5 | 11 |
|
6 | 12 | ## 2. Strategic Vision |
7 | | -The 2026–2035 period marks the transition from static AI risk management to **autonomous, cryptographic, and systemic governance**. Sentinel v2.4 provides the hardware-rooted, formal-assurance, and federated-defense infrastructure required to govern high-capability AI agents operating at machine speed. |
| 13 | +The 2026–2035 period marks the transition from static AI risk management to |
| 14 | +**autonomous, cryptographic, and systemic governance**. Sentinel v2.4 provides |
| 15 | +the hardware-rooted, formal-assurance, and federated-defense infrastructure |
| 16 | +required to govern high-capability AI agents operating at machine speed. |
8 | 17 |
|
9 | 18 | ## 3. Phased Roadmap |
10 | 19 |
|
11 | 20 | ### 3.1 Phase 0: Foundational Hardening & PQC Migration (2026–Q2 2027) |
12 | 21 | - **Objective**: Establish the zero-trust execution and audit baseline. |
13 | 22 | - **Key Milestones**: |
14 | | - - Deployment of Sentinel v2.4 Baseline with **PQC WORM audit logging** (Kafka + S3 Object Lock). |
15 | | - - Integration of **AMD SEV-SNP / Intel TDX** confidential enclaves for all Tier 0/1 model weights. |
16 | | - - Activation of **SARA (Self-correction & Alignment Routing Agent)** within the StaR-MoE architecture. |
| 23 | + - Deployment of Sentinel v2.4 Baseline with **PQC WORM audit logging** |
| 24 | + (Kafka + S3 Object Lock). |
| 25 | + - Integration of **AMD SEV-SNP / Intel TDX** confidential enclaves for all |
| 26 | + Tier 0/1 model weights. |
| 27 | + - Activation of **SARA (Self-correction & Alignment Routing Agent)** |
| 28 | + within the StaR-MoE architecture. |
17 | 29 | - Implementation of **vTPM remote attestation** (PCR_MATCH=TRUE). |
18 | | -- **Exit Criteria**: 100% of systemic models reside in confidential enclaves; PQC signature verification active. |
| 30 | +- **Exit Criteria**: 100% of systemic models reside in confidential enclaves; |
| 31 | + PQC signature verification active. |
19 | 32 |
|
20 | 33 | ### 3.2 Phase 1: Policy Specification & Industrialization (Q3 2027–2028) |
21 | 34 | - **Objective**: Operationalize compliance-as-code and formal safety boundaries. |
22 | 35 | - **Key Milestones**: |
23 | | - - Conversion of all enterprise controls to **OSCAL 1.1.2** and **OPA/Rego** policy bundles. |
24 | | - - Formal verification of containment protocols using **TLA+ SentinelContainmentProtocol**. |
| 36 | + - Conversion of all enterprise controls to **OSCAL 1.1.2** and **OPA/Rego** |
| 37 | + policy bundles. |
| 38 | + - Formal verification of containment protocols using |
| 39 | + **TLA+ SentinelContainmentProtocol**. |
25 | 40 | - Integration with **ICGC (Inter-Governmental Compute Governance)** registries. |
26 | 41 | - Deployment of **WorkflowAI Pro** for end-to-end governed agentic workflows. |
27 | | -- **Exit Criteria**: 100% of deployment gates are policy-enforced; TLA+ invariants verified for top 20 high-risk workflows. |
| 42 | +- **Exit Criteria**: 100% of deployment gates are policy-enforced; TLA+ |
| 43 | + invariants verified for top 20 high-risk workflows. |
28 | 44 |
|
29 | 45 | ### 3.3 Phase 2: Systemic Risk & Collective Defense (2029–2030) |
30 | 46 | - **Objective**: Mitigate sector-wide contagion and activate federated defense. |
31 | 47 | - **Key Milestones**: |
32 | 48 | - Operationalization of **G-SRI (Global Systemic Risk Index)** monitoring. |
33 | | - - Launch of **SIP v3.0 (Sentinel Interoperability Protocol)** for GIEN-based telemetry sharing. |
34 | | - - Implementation of **Zero-Knowledge (ZK) Systemic Risk Proofs** (Circom/Groth16). |
| 49 | + - Launch of **SIP v3.0 (Sentinel Interoperability Protocol)** for |
| 50 | + GIEN-based telemetry sharing. |
| 51 | + - Implementation of **Zero-Knowledge (ZK) Systemic Risk Proofs** |
| 52 | + (Circom/Groth16). |
35 | 53 | - Regular **Red Dawn** crisis chaos engineering simulations. |
36 | | -- **Exit Criteria**: Real-time G-SRI dashboard active; ZK-proofs accepted by lead supervisors. |
| 54 | +- **Exit Criteria**: Real-time G-SRI dashboard active; ZK-proofs accepted by |
| 55 | + lead supervisors. |
37 | 56 |
|
38 | 57 | ### 3.4 Phase 3: Autonomous Supervisory Excellence (2031–2035) |
39 | 58 | - **Objective**: Scale governance to AGI/ASI autonomy levels. |
40 | 59 | - **Key Milestones**: |
41 | | - - Deployment of **Autonomous Supervisory Agents (ASA)** for continuous real-time audit. |
| 60 | + - Deployment of **Autonomous Supervisory Agents (ASA)** for continuous |
| 61 | + real-time audit. |
42 | 62 | - Migration of ZK pipelines to **zk-STARKs** for long-term audit transparency. |
43 | 63 | - Global activation of **OmegaActual** treaty enforcement smart contracts. |
44 | 64 | - Integration of civilizational-scale containment and emergency kill-switches. |
45 | | -- **Exit Criteria**: Near-zero latency ACR enforcement; ISO/IEC 42001 certification across all global hubs. |
| 65 | +- **Exit Criteria**: Near-zero latency ACR enforcement; ISO/IEC 42001 |
| 66 | + certification across all global hubs. |
46 | 67 |
|
47 | 68 | ## 4. Governance Components |
48 | 69 | - **Sentinel AI Governance Stack v2.4**: The core orchestration layer. |
49 | 70 | - **Omni-Sentinel Mesh v4.0**: Distributed execution and policy enforcement mesh. |
50 | | -- **Omni-Sentinel Cognitive Execution Environment (CEE)**: TEE-based secure inference. |
| 71 | +- **Omni-Sentinel Cognitive Execution Environment (CEE)**: TEE-based secure |
| 72 | + inference. |
51 | 73 | - **G-Stack**: The 10-layer civilizational assurance architecture. |
52 | 74 | - **GAI-SOC**: Global AI Security Operations Center for 24/7 telemetry monitoring. |
53 | 75 |
|
54 | 76 | ## 5. Implementation Success Metrics (KPIs) |
55 | 77 | - **Mean Time to Containment (MTTC)**: Target < 60 seconds for systemic breaches. |
56 | | -- **Assurance Integrity**: 100% of audit records protected by PQC WORM and S3 Object Lock. |
| 78 | +- **Assurance Integrity**: 100% of audit records protected by PQC WORM and |
| 79 | + S3 Object Lock. |
57 | 80 | - **Compliance Coverage**: 100% mapping to EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and Basel III/IV. |
58 | 81 | - **Systemic Drift Index**: Max 0.1 for MoE routing layer stability. |
59 | 82 |
|
|
0 commit comments