|
| 1 | +# Decadal Roadmap & Technical Requirements (2026–2035) |
| 2 | +## Enterprise-Grade AGI/ASI Governance, Containment, and PQC Compliance for G-SIFIs |
| 3 | + |
| 4 | +**Target Audience**: Senior Enterprise AI Safety & Governance Architects, G-SIFI Board Risk Committees, Regulatory Examiners. |
| 5 | +**Classification**: STRATEGIC ARCHITECTURE - BOARD USE ONLY |
| 6 | +**Version**: 2.4.0 (Aligned with Sentinel AI Governance Stack) |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +--- |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +## 1. Executive Summary: The Omni-Sentinel Mandate |
| 11 | +By 2026, the transition from Narrow AI to General Intelligence (AGI) and nascent Superintelligence (ASI) necessitates a shift from *reactive* compliance to *predictive, hardware-rooted* governance. This roadmap operationalizes the **Sentinel AI Governance Stack v2.4** across the **Omni-Sentinel Mesh**, ensuring G-SIFIs remain resilient against systemic AI risks while maintaining compliance with Basel III/IV, SR 26-2, and global PQC mandates. |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +--- |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +## 2. Decadal Implementation Phases |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +### Phase 0: Foundation & Inventory (2026) |
| 18 | +* **Sentinel v2.4 Deployment**: Baseline deployment of the Sovereign Gateway with OPA/Rego enforcement. |
| 19 | +* **Inventory & Tiering**: 100% cataloging of models/agents with impact tiering (T0-T4). |
| 20 | +* **PQC WORM Bootstrap**: Implementation of **ML-DSA-based WORM** (NIST FIPS 204) audit logging for high-assurance evidence. |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +### Phase 1: Policy Industrialization (2027) |
| 23 | +* **Compliance-as-Code**: **OSCAL 1.1.2** based regulatory mapping (EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001). |
| 24 | +* **StaR-MoE Stabilization**: Deployment of **SARA (Self-Correction & Alignment Routing Agent)** and **ACR (Autonomous Compliance Router)** within Mixture-of-Experts architectures to prevent catastrophic misalignment. |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +### Phase 2: Containment & Perpetual Assurance (2028) |
| 27 | +* **Omni-Sentinel Mesh**: Hardened execution environments using **AMD SEV-SNP / Intel TDX** attested enclaves. |
| 28 | +* **Hardware Kill Switches**: Integration of BMC/IPMI-level hardware kill switches for T4/ASI-class workloads. |
| 29 | +* **vTPM Remote Attestation**: Continuous verification with **PCR_MATCH=TRUE** every 1,000ms. |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +### Phase 3: Prudential Stress & G-SRI (2029) |
| 32 | +* **Systemic Risk Proofs**: **Zero-Knowledge (ZK) systemic risk proofs** for Basel III/IV capital adequacy reporting. |
| 33 | +* **G-SRI Monitoring**: Global Systemic Risk Index tracking with automated containment triggers at 0.75 threshold. |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +### Phase 4: Interoperability & Collective Defense (2030) |
| 36 | +* **SIP v3.0**: **Sentinel Interoperability Protocol** for cross-institution evidence exchange. |
| 37 | +* **GIEN Collective Defense**: Participation in the Global Intelligence Exchange Network for real-time systemic incident fusion. |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +### Phase 5: The ASI Horizon (2031–2035) |
| 40 | +* **2031-2032**: Dynamic risk budgeting with formal constraints and ZK-Fairness proofs. |
| 41 | +* **2033**: Shared systemic incident intelligence utility (GIEN-v4). |
| 42 | +* **2034**: Coordinated multi-regulator simulation sandboxes (NIST AI 600-1 aligned). |
| 43 | +* **2035**: Near-real-time cross-border prudential supervision and ISO 42001:2035 certification. |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +--- |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +## 3. Technical Requirements Architecture |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +### 3.1 Cryptographic & Audit Plane |
| 50 | +* **PQC Signature Schema**: All audit records must be signed using **CRYSTALS-Dilithium** (ML-DSA) per NIST FIPS 204. |
| 51 | +* **WORM Evidence**: Kafka-backed audit streams mirrored to S3 Object Lock (Compliance Mode) with a 10-year retention policy. |
| 52 | +* **ZK-Compliance**: Proofs of non-violation for GDPR Article 22 and SR 11-7 must be generated for all Tier-1 automated decisions. |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +### 3.2 Compute & Execution Plane |
| 55 | +* **Confidential Computing**: Mandatory TEE (SEV-SNP/TDX) for all PII and systemic-risk-sensitive workloads. |
| 56 | +* **Attestation Logic**: vTPM 2.0 with remote attestation; boot-time and runtime PCR verification (PCR_MATCH=TRUE). |
| 57 | +* **Routing Stabilization**: StaR-MoE architectures must implement **SARA** for logic verification and **ACR** for policy-based routing to prevent "Reward Hacking." |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +### 3.3 Governance-as-Code |
| 60 | +* **OSCAL Integration**: Documentation must be emitted in OSCAL 1.1.2 JSON/XML format for automated ingestion by supervisory bodies. |
| 61 | +* **Rego Enforcement**: 100% of API endpoints gated by OPA sidecars with sub-50ms latency. |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +--- |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +## 4. Regulatory & Standards Matrix |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +| Framework | Requirement | Implementation Mechanism | |
| 68 | +| :--- | :--- | :--- | |
| 69 | +| **EU AI Act** | Annex IV Documentation | OSCAL 1.1.2 Automated Dossier | |
| 70 | +| **NIST AI RMF** | Map/Measure/Manage | G-SRI + BBOM Dashboard | |
| 71 | +| **Basel III/IV** | Operational Risk Capital | ZK-Systemic Risk Proofs | |
| 72 | +| **SR 26-2** | Board Oversight | Executive Cockpit + Sentinel Audit | |
| 73 | +| **DORA / NIS2** | Resiliency / Reporting | GIEN Incident Fusion | |
| 74 | +| **GDPR Art 22** | Automated Decisioning | XAI + Fiduciary ASA | |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +--- |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +## 5. Risk & Control KPI Targets |
| 79 | +* **Policy Determinism**: 100% spec-to-runtime conformance. |
| 80 | +* **Containment SLA**: < 60s from anomaly detection to hardware-rooted isolation. |
| 81 | +* **Audit Integrity**: 0.0% PQC signature failure rate. |
| 82 | +* **Supervisory Transparency**: > 98% of regulatory requests fulfilled via SIP v3.0 APIs. |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +--- |
| 85 | +**Approved by**: Omni-Sentinel Governance Board |
| 86 | +**Date**: 2026-01-20 |
0 commit comments