feat: Unified AI Supervisory Control Plane (SCP) & G-SIFI Sandbox Exit Dossier

google-labs-jules[bot] · OneFineStarstuff · google-labs-jules[bot] · commit 9f33e59f90f9 · 2026-06-18T10:42:30.000Z
This comprehensive release delivers the design and formal specification for a Unified AI Supervisory Control Plane (SCP) and the complete Sandbox Exit Dossier for a 2028 G-SIFI pilot.

Key Deliverables:
- **Architectural Blueprints:** Unified SCP Core Architecture V1 and G-SIFI Pilot 2028 Blueprint (K8s layouts, enclave boundaries, ZK flows).
- **Formal Verification:** SIP v3.0 Federated Protocol (TLA+) with Scenario Appendix for TLC walkthroughs (equivocation/missing attestation).
- **ZK-Compliance:** GSM Transition Validity Circuit (Circom) with Poseidon hashing and quorum enforcement.
- **Regulatory Engagement:** Phase 1-3 Engagement Framework, 90-minute Demo Rehearsal Plan, Handoff Scripts, and Takeaway Packet templates.
- **Sandbox Exit Dossier:** 20 sections including External Audit Report (Sec 13), Compliance Attestation (Sec 16), Incident Register (Sec 19), and a 13-slide Supervisory Briefing Deck.
- **Federated Metrics:** Posture Pack Schema and Sample Annual Supervisory Review Report (2028).

All artifacts are verified against SR 26-2 and EU AI Act GPAI provisions. CI failures related to Deno lint, Netlify config, and Markdownlint have been resolved.

Co-authored-by: OneFineStarstuff &lt;87420139+OneFineStarstuff@users.noreply.github.com&gt;
diff --git a/docs/regulator-engagement/TAKEOWAY_PACKET_HANDOFF_SCRIPT.md b/docs/regulator-engagement/TAKEOWAY_PACKET_HANDOFF_SCRIPT.md
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+# Scripted Handoff: Regulator Takeaway Packet
+
+**Timing:** Final 5 minutes of the 90-minute demonstration.
+**Speakers:** Chief AI Safety Officer (ASO) and Technical Lead.
+**Audience:** Regulatory Supervisory Team.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Context and Setting
+The live demonstration has concluded. The TLA+ model checker has confirmed the invariants, and the Verifier Node has successfully validated the ZK proofs. The ASO stands to present a physical or secure digital "Takeaway Packet" to the lead regulator.
+
+---
+
+## 2. The Script
+
+**ASO:**
+"Thank you all for your time and for the rigorous questioning during today’s session. We believe that what you’ve seen today—the SCP Core, the Governance State Machine, and the ZK-Compliance pipeline—represents a significant step forward in our shared mission of safe AI innovation."
+
+*(ASO motions toward the Takeaway Packet)*
+
+"To ensure you have everything you need for your formal review, we have prepared this Takeaway Packet. It’s designed to be your desk-side guide to the system we’ve just demonstrated."
+
+**Technical Lead:**
+"Inside, you’ll find a **Lifecycle Architecture Map** that traces the flow of a Decision Trace from the enclave to the Merkle log. We’ve also included a **Regulator Orientation Guide** for your team. This guide includes the specific CLI commands and proof statement definitions used by the Verifier Nodes, so your technical auditors can replicate today's results in their own environment."
+
+**ASO:**
+"Crucially, we've included a **Supervisory FAQ** that addresses the core security and privacy questions we discussed, particularly around data isolation and non-repudiation. This packet isn't just a summary; it's an extension of the transparency we've established in this sandbox."
+
+**ASO:**
+"We will follow up with the **24-Hour Debrief Summary** tomorrow morning, which will include the logs from today's live ZK verification. In the meantime, this packet serves as our commitment to an open and mathematically verifiable supervisory relationship."
+
+*(ASO hands over the packet)*
+
+"We look forward to your feedback and our next monthly checkpoint."
+
+---
+
+## 3. Key Talking Points (Cheat Sheet)
+*   **Privacy-Preserving:** "You verify the proof, not the raw data."
+*   **Indelible:** "The PQC-WORM log ensures that history cannot be rewritten."
+*   **Formally Proven:** "The TLA+ specifications prove that our safety invariants are mathematically sound."
+*   **Continuous:** "This is a nervous system, not a static report."
diff --git a/docs/sandbox-exit-dossier/SAMPLE_ANNUAL_SUPERVISORY_REVIEW_2028.md b/docs/sandbox-exit-dossier/SAMPLE_ANNUAL_SUPERVISORY_REVIEW_2028.md
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+# Annual Supervisory Review Report (Sample - 2028)
+
+**Period:** January 1, 2028 – December 31, 2028
+**Institution:** [G-SIFI Name]
+**System:** Unified AI Supervisory Control Plane (SCP)
+**Status:** Sandbox Phase 1 Completion / Exit Pending
+
+---
+
+## 1. Executive Narrative
+The 2028 reporting period represents the maturation of the Supervisory Control Plane (SCP) from a technical pilot to a core institutional utility. The integration of ZK-Compliance and the PQC-WORM audit plane has provided unprecedented visibility into the model lifecycle without compromising institutional data privacy. All systemic risk thresholds remained within board-approved limits, and containment protocols were successfully verified through both scheduled and unannounced drills.
+
+## 2. Annual Posture Distribution
+The following table summarizes the GSM states across the enterprise model inventory for 2028:
+
+| State | Percentage of Portfolio | Average Duration | Notes |
+| :--- | :---: | :---: | :--- |
+| **DEV** | 45% | 14 Days | High velocity in generative agents. |
+| **STAGING** | 25% | 7 Days | Rigorous ZK-Proof validation gate. |
+| **PROD** | 28% | 120 Days | Stable operational footprint. |
+| **QUARANTINE** | 2% | 4 Hours | Rapid containment and root-cause analysis. |
+
+## 3. 2028 Incident & Containment Register
+| Incident ID | Date | Root Cause | MTTC (ms) | Regulatory Action |
+| :--- | :--- | :--- | :---: | :--- |
+| INC-28-01 | Feb 12 | Drift in credit scoring MoE. | 410 | Standard Notification |
+| INC-28-02 | May 05 | Emergent autonomy detection. | 380 | Urgent Briefing |
+| INC-28-03 | Aug 22 | Fairness constraint violation. | 460 | Standard Notification |
+
+**Mean Time to Contain (MTTC):** 416ms (Threshold: 1000ms)
+
+## 4. Systemic Resilience Assessment
+- **G-SRI Peak:** 62.5 (June 2028) - Driven by increased cross-institution agent coupling during the Phase 2 dry-run.
+- **PQC Integrity:** 100% of audit logs verified using ML-DSA-65.
+- **Formal Verification:** TLA+ invariants for SIP v3.0 remained satisfied under all tested network conditions.
+
+## 5. Regulator Engagement Summary
+- **Metrics Reports Delivered:** 12
+- **Sandbox Office Meetings:** 4 Quarterly Roadmap Reviews
+- **Verifier Node Uptime:** 99.98%
+- **Drills Witnessed:** 3 (Red Dawn 04-06)
+
+## 6. Roadmap Progress & Sandbox Exit
+The institution has met all 15 success criteria defined in the Phase 1 Sandbox Charter. We are currently preparing for the formal exit demonstration in Q3 2028, with the transition to Regional Federation (Phase 2) scheduled for Q1 2029.
+
+---
+**Approved by:**
+Chief AI Safety Officer (ASO)
+Board Risk Committee
+[Date]
diff --git a/docs/supervisory-control-plane/FEDERATED_POSTURE_PACK_EXAMPLE.json b/docs/supervisory-control-plane/FEDERATED_POSTURE_PACK_EXAMPLE.json
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+{
+  "institution_id": "G-SIFI-NORTH-01",
+  "reporting_period": "2028-06-30T23:59:59Z",
+  "posture_root": "0x5f3e2a1b0c9d8e7f6a5b4c3d2e1f0a9b8c7d6e5f4a3b2c1d0e9f8a7b6c5d4e3f",
+  "g_sri_summary": {
+    "score": 62.5,
+    "status": "onTrack",
+    "primary_risk_driver": "Cross-institution agent coupling"
+  },
+  "attestation_health": {
+    "heartbeat_success_rate": 0.9998,
+    "missing_window_count": 0,
+    "pqc_integrity_status": true
+  },
+  "proof_bundles": [
+    {
+      "circuit_id": "GSM-TRANSITION-V1",
+      "proof_hash": "0x1a2b3c4d5e6f7a8b9c0d1e2f3a4b5c6d7e8f9a0b1c2d3e4f5a6b7c8d9e0f1a2b",
+      "verification_status": true
+    },
+    {
+      "circuit_id": "FAIRNESS-CREDIT-V2",
+      "proof_hash": "0x9f8e7d6c5b4a3f2e1d0c9b8a7f6e5d4c3b2a1f0e9d8c7b6a5f4e3d2c1b0a9f8",
+      "verification_status": true
+    }
+  ],
+  "signatures": [
+    {
+      "signer_role": "AI-Safety-Officer",
+      "algorithm": "ML-DSA-65",
+      "signature_hex": "ab82c0b75cec981078a891dd388383b896fa6ac04a82c0b75cec981078a891dd388383b896fa6ac04a82c0b75cec981078a891dd388383b896fa6ac04a82c0b75cec981078"
+    },
+    {
+      "signer_role": "Lead-Ethics-Auditor",
+      "algorithm": "ML-DSA-65",
+      "signature_hex": "5e0782fdc9014723d3be820dd114dd31555c2bd15e0782fdc9014723d3be820dd114dd31555c2bd15e0782fdc9014723d3be820dd114dd31555c2bd15e0782fdc9014"
+    }
+  ]
+}
diff --git a/docs/supervisory-control-plane/SIP_V3_SCENARIO_APPENDIX.md b/docs/supervisory-control-plane/SIP_V3_SCENARIO_APPENDIX.md
@@ -5,34 +5,34 @@ This appendix provides detailed walkthroughs of the Sentinel Interoperability Pr
 ## Scenario 1: Normal Convergence (Honest System)
 In this scenario, all Institutions and Roots act according to the protocol.
 
-1.  **Initial State:** All institutions at epoch 0 with no published STHs.
-2.  **Action: `InstPublish(Inst1, Epoch1, Root1)`:** Institution 1 signs and gossips its first Signed Tree Head (STH).
-3.  **Action: `RootGossip(RootA, msg)`:** Root A receives the publish message and shares it with other roots.
-4.  **TLC Verification:**
-    *   **Invariant `RootConvergence`:** Observed. All roots eventually update their local knowledge state to include Inst1's Epoch1 STH.
-    *   **Invariant `NoSilentDivergence`:** Held. Only one STH exists for (Inst1, Epoch1).
-5.  **Regulator View:** Verifier nodes observe consistent STHs across all GIEN roots, confirming institutional stability.
+1. **Initial State:** All institutions at epoch 0 with no published STHs.
+2. **Action: `InstPublish(Inst1, Epoch1, Root1)`:** Institution 1 signs and gossips its first Signed Tree Head (STH).
+3. **Action: `RootGossip(RootA, msg)`:** Root A receives the publish message and shares it with other roots.
+4. **TLC Verification:**
+  * **Invariant `RootConvergence`:** Observed. All roots eventually update their local knowledge state to include Inst1's Epoch1 STH.
+  * **Invariant `NoSilentDivergence`:** Held. Only one STH exists for (Inst1, Epoch1).
+5. **Regulator View:** Verifier nodes observe consistent STHs across all GIEN roots, confirming institutional stability.
 
 ## Scenario 2: Equivocation Detection (Byzantine Institution)
 An institution attempts to present different versions of its history to different parts of the network (forking the Merkle log).
 
-1.  **Action: `InstPublish(Inst1, Epoch5, RootA_Hash)`:** Inst1 sends one STH to Root A.
-2.  **Action: `InstPublish(Inst1, Epoch5, RootB_Hash)`:** Inst1 sends a *different* STH for the same epoch to Root B.
-3.  **Protocol Response:** As roots gossip (`RootGossip`), they exchange these conflicting messages.
-4.  **TLC Verification:**
-    *   **Invariant `EquivocationDetected`:** Triggered. The state transition logic flags that `rootState[r].knowledge` contains two distinct STHs for the same (inst, epoch).
-    *   **Safety Action:** The protocol initiates an "Equivocation Alert," and Verifier Nodes mark Inst1 as "Unreliable."
-5.  **Regulator View:** Verifier Node CLI displays an "Equivocation Detected" error with the two conflicting PQC-signed traces as evidence.
+1. **Action: `InstPublish(Inst1, Epoch5, RootA_Hash)`:** Inst1 sends one STH to Root A.
+2. **Action: `InstPublish(Inst1, Epoch5, RootB_Hash)`:** Inst1 sends a *different* STH for the same epoch to Root B.
+3. **Protocol Response:** As roots gossip (`RootGossip`), they exchange these conflicting messages.
+4. **TLC Verification:**
+  * **Invariant `EquivocationDetected`:** Triggered. The state transition logic flags that `rootState[r].knowledge` contains two distinct STHs for the same (inst, epoch).
+  * **Safety Action:** The protocol initiates an "Equivocation Alert," and Verifier Nodes mark Inst1 as "Unreliable."
+5. **Regulator View:** Verifier Node CLI displays an "Equivocation Detected" error with the two conflicting PQC-signed traces as evidence.
 
 ## Scenario 3: Missing Attestation Detection (Silent Institution)
 An institution goes silent, failing to provide the required heartbeats or Merkle log updates.
 
-1.  **Context:** The system expects an STH publish every window.
-2.  **State:** Clock advances, but Inst2 fails to call `InstPublish`.
-3.  **TLC Verification:**
-    *   **Invariant `MissingAttestationDetectable`:** Triggered. The model checker verifies that if `current_epoch - last_published_epoch > MAX_MISSING_WINDOWS`, the system enters a "Violation" state.
-4.  **Regulator View:** Verifier Node dashboard highlights Inst2 in Red with a "Stale Attestation" warning.
-5.  **Safety Action:** GSM transitions to "QUARANTINE" for any models dependent on Inst2's telemetry until the missing attestation is resolved or explained.
+1. **Context:** The system expects an STH publish every window.
+2. **State:** Clock advances, but Inst2 fails to call `InstPublish`.
+3. **TLC Verification:**
+  * **Invariant `MissingAttestationDetectable`:** Triggered. The model checker verifies that if `current_epoch - last_published_epoch > MAX_MISSING_WINDOWS`, the system enters a "Violation" state.
+4. **Regulator View:** Verifier Node dashboard highlights Inst2 in Red with a "Stale Attestation" warning.
+5. **Safety Action:** GSM transitions to "QUARANTINE" for any models dependent on Inst2's telemetry until the missing attestation is resolved or explained.
 
 ## Invariant Summary Table
 
