feat(WP-064): Expert 2026-2030 AGI/ASI technical governance, safety, containment & civilizational security blueprint for G-SIFIs (BBOM, UMIF TLA+/Coq/Q#, CAS-SPP + Bayesian Belief Networks, ARRE + zk-SNARK, Kafka/K8s/OPA)#114
Merged
Conversation
…ASI technical governance, safety, containment & civilizational security blueprint for G-SIFIs
WP-064 adds the formal-assurance integration layer (formal verification +
behavioral provenance + zero-knowledge compliance) on top of WP-061/062/063,
introducing constructs not previously covered:
M1 BBOM (Behavioral Bill of Materials) — signed, machine-readable behavioral
provenance (capabilities, prohibited behaviors, bound invariants, eval
evidence, lineage); 8 components; PQC-signed; promotion gate.
M2 Unified Meta-Invariant Framework (UMIF) — single invariant ledger proven
across TLA+ (temporal safety/liveness), Coq (deductive correctness) and
Q# (quantum-resource bounds); 7 meta-invariants; CI proof gate.
M3 AGI Containment Labs — CAS-SPP staged promotion (5 stages) gated by
Bayesian Belief Networks (6 nodes) computing a systemic-risk posterior.
M4 Regulator-facing stack — ARRE Annex-IV dossier assembly + zk-SNARK
zero-knowledge compliance proofs (5 proof statements) preserving IP/GDPR.
M5 Audit & control architecture — Kafka WORM (append-only, hash-chained,
PQC-signed) on Kubernetes with OPA/Rego compliance-as-code.
M6 Regulatory alignment — EU AI Act 2024/1689 incl. Annex IV, NIST AI RMF
1.0 / AI 600-1, ISO/IEC 42001, Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, NIS2, FCA
SMCR/Consumer Duty, MAS/HKMA FEAT, GDPR.
M7 Phased dependency-aware 2026-2030 rollout (assurance precedes capability).
M8 Regulator-ready report sections (<title>/<abstract>/<content>).
Artifacts (reproducible, trailing-newline for pre-commit.ci parity):
- gen-gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030.py -> data/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030.json
(8 modules / 32 sections; 8 BBOM components, 7 meta-invariants, 5 CAS-SPP
stages, 6 BBN nodes, 5 zk-SNARK proofs, 5 report sections)
- gen-gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030-html.py -> public/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030.html
- server.js: page route /gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030 + 25 API endpoints with
:id lookups (404 handling) under /api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030
Verification: data & HTML regenerate byte-identical; node --check passes; all
25 endpoints return 200; :id lookups return 200/404 correctly; page loads with
zero console errors.
|
The files' contents are under analysis for test generation. |
|
Review changes with Changed Files
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
Review these changes at https://app.gitnotebooks.com/OneFineStarstuff/OneFineStarstuff.github.io/pull/114 |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry @OneFineStarstuff, you have reached your weekly rate limit of 500000 diff characters.
Please try again later or upgrade to continue using Sourcery
|
View changes in DiffLens |
Contributor
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR introduces WP-064, a comprehensive governance blueprint for G-SIFI AGI/ASI technical governance spanning 2026–2030. The implementation follows a three-layer pipeline: a Python generator defines the blueprint data structure and writes it to JSON; a second generator reads that JSON and renders it to a styled HTML dashboard; and Express server routes expose the data via REST API and serve the dashboard as a static page. ChangesWP-064 Governance Blueprint Pipeline
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ast-grep (0.43.0)rag-agentic-dashboard/server.jsThanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Not up to standards ⛔🔴 Issues
|
| Category | Results |
|---|---|
| Documentation | 10 minor |
| ErrorProne | 1 medium |
| CodeStyle | 61 minor |
| Complexity | 3 minor |
🟢 Metrics 28 complexity · 16 duplication
Metric Results Complexity 28 Duplication 16
NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.
|
View changes in DiffLens |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js (1)
25337-25390: ⚡ Quick winConsider extracting a helper function to reduce duplication.
The by-ID lookup pattern is repeated seven times (modules, BBOM components, meta-invariants, containment stages, BBN nodes, compliance proofs, report sections). Extracting a helper would improve maintainability and reduce the risk of inconsistent error handling.
♻️ Proposed refactor to introduce a lookup helper
Add this helper function before the route definitions:
/** * Create a by-ID lookup endpoint. * `@param` {string} path - API path * `@param` {Array} collection - Array to search * `@param` {string} idField - Field name for ID comparison * `@param` {string} entityName - Human-readable entity name for error message */ function createByIdEndpoint(path, collection, idField, entityName) { app.get(path, (req, res) => { const item = collection.find(x => x[idField] === req.params.id); if (!item) { return res.status(404).json({ error: `${entityName} not found`, id: req.params.id }); } res.json(item); }); }Then replace the seven by-ID endpoints with:
// Modules app.get('/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/modules', (req, res) => res.json(GSIFI64.modules)); createByIdEndpoint('/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/modules/:id', GSIFI64.modules, 'mid', 'module'); // BBOM components (M1) app.get('/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/bbom-components', (req, res) => res.json(GSIFI64.bbomComponents)); createByIdEndpoint('/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/bbom-components/:id', GSIFI64.bbomComponents, 'bcid', 'bbom component'); // Meta-invariants — TLA+/Coq/Q# (M2) app.get('/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/meta-invariants', (req, res) => res.json(GSIFI64.metaInvariants)); createByIdEndpoint('/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/meta-invariants/:id', GSIFI64.metaInvariants, 'miid', 'meta-invariant'); // CAS-SPP containment stages (M3) app.get('/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/containment-stages', (req, res) => res.json(GSIFI64.containmentStages)); createByIdEndpoint('/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/containment-stages/:id', GSIFI64.containmentStages, 'csid', 'containment stage'); // Bayesian Belief Network nodes (M3) app.get('/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/bbn-nodes', (req, res) => res.json(GSIFI64.bbnNodes)); createByIdEndpoint('/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/bbn-nodes/:id', GSIFI64.bbnNodes, 'bnid', 'bbn node'); // zk-SNARK compliance proofs (M4) app.get('/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/reg-compliance-proofs', (req, res) => res.json(GSIFI64.regComplianceProofs)); createByIdEndpoint('/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/reg-compliance-proofs/:id', GSIFI64.regComplianceProofs, 'rpid', 'compliance proof'); // Report sections (M8) app.get('/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/report-sections', (req, res) => res.json(GSIFI64.reportSections)); createByIdEndpoint('/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/report-sections/:id', GSIFI64.reportSections, 'rsid', 'report section');🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js` around lines 25337 - 25390, The repeated by-ID lookup handlers should be consolidated into a single helper: implement a function createByIdEndpoint(path, collection, idField, entityName) that registers an app.get for the given path, finds the item via collection.find(x => x[idField] === req.params.id), returns 404 with { error: `${entityName} not found`, id: req.params.id } when missing, and res.json(item) when found; then replace the seven handlers that reference GSIFI64.modules / GSIFI64.bbomComponents / GSIFI64.metaInvariants / GSIFI64.containmentStages / GSIFI64.bbnNodes / GSIFI64.regComplianceProofs / GSIFI64.reportSections with calls to createByIdEndpoint using their respective id fields (mid, bcid, miid, csid, bnid, rpid, rsid) and human-readable entity names.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030.py`:
- Line 37: The OUT path is used to write JSON but its parent "data" directory
may not exist, causing FileNotFoundError; before opening/writing to OUT, ensure
the parent directory exists by creating it (e.g., using OUT = Path(...) and
calling OUT.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) or using
os.makedirs(os.path.dirname(OUT), exist_ok=True)); apply this fix where OUT is
defined and also at the other write sites referenced around lines 389-391 so all
writes create parent directories first.
In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js`:
- Around line 25400-25404: The route handler for
app.get('/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030/regulators/:name') uses
decodeURIComponent(req.params.name) which can throw on malformed
percent-encoding; wrap the decode step in a try/catch inside the handler (around
decodeURIComponent(req.params.name)) and on error return res.status(400).json({
error: 'malformed regulator name encoding', name: req.params.name, details:
err.message }) instead of letting the exception propagate; then use the decoded
value to find the regulator in GSIFI64.regulators (the variable r) and proceed
as before.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js`:
- Around line 25337-25390: The repeated by-ID lookup handlers should be
consolidated into a single helper: implement a function createByIdEndpoint(path,
collection, idField, entityName) that registers an app.get for the given path,
finds the item via collection.find(x => x[idField] === req.params.id), returns
404 with { error: `${entityName} not found`, id: req.params.id } when missing,
and res.json(item) when found; then replace the seven handlers that reference
GSIFI64.modules / GSIFI64.bbomComponents / GSIFI64.metaInvariants /
GSIFI64.containmentStages / GSIFI64.bbnNodes / GSIFI64.regComplianceProofs /
GSIFI64.reportSections with calls to createByIdEndpoint using their respective
id fields (mid, bcid, miid, csid, bnid, rpid, rsid) and human-readable entity
names.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 3b648df4-4aed-419e-9b44-a700ec0b613e
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
rag-agentic-dashboard/data/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030.jsonrag-agentic-dashboard/gen-gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030-html.pyrag-agentic-dashboard/gen-gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030.pyrag-agentic-dashboard/public/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030.htmlrag-agentic-dashboard/server.js
❌ Deploy Preview for onefinestarstuff failed.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WP-064 — Expert 2026–2030 AGI/ASI Technical Governance, Safety, Containment & Civilizational Security Blueprint for G-SIFIs
Adds the formal-assurance integration layer (formal verification + behavioral provenance + zero-knowledge compliance) on top of the WP-061/062/063 blueprints, introducing constructs not previously covered.
New assurance constructs
Regulatory alignment (M6)
EU AI Act 2024/1689 incl. Annex IV, NIST AI RMF 1.0, NIST AI 600-1, ISO/IEC 42001, Basel III/IV, SR 11-7, NIS2, FCA SMCR/Consumer Duty, MAS/HKMA FEAT, GDPR (Arts. 5/22/35).
Roadmap & reporting
<title>/<abstract>/<content>Artifacts (reproducible)
gen-gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030.py→data/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030.json(8 modules / 32 sections)gen-gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030-html.py→public/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030.htmlserver.js: page route/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030+ 25 API endpoints with:idlookups (404 handling) under/api/gsifi-agi-formal-gov-2030Verification
node --check server.jspasses:idlookups return 200 (valid) / 404 (bogus)origin/main(clean merge, no conflicts)Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes