feat(agi-governance-unified-v2): Unified AGI/ASI Governance Framework v2.0 — Enterprise AI Transformation & Civilisational Safety#40
Merged
Conversation
… v2.0 — Enterprise AI Transformation & Civilisational Safety
SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001 v2.0.0 — Comprehensive strategic analysis and implementation guidance
for enterprise-standard AGI/ASI governance and communication architectures.
Dashboard (agi-governance-unified.html):
- 701 lines, 64.9 KB, dark theme, 0 console errors, 14 console log entries
- 16 sections covering all 10 integration domains in depth
- Enterprise AGI Readiness Level (EARL) with 5-level maturity model
- 10-Stage AI Evolution Model with alignment challenges per stage
- Multi-Framework Compliance Matrix (EU AI Act, NIST, ISO 42001, GDPR, FCRA, ECOA)
- Sentinel v2.4 Governance Platform telemetry (22 systems, 1.2M evals/day, 38ms P99)
- 5 Enterprise AI Reference Architectures (WorkflowAI Pro, EAIP, Sentinel, RAG, CCaaS)
- Programme Risk Register (4 active, 6 closed from Veridical)
- Cognitive Resonance Architecture (5 principles, 5-quarter roadmap)
- Open Future Doctrine (6 constraints for AGI/ASI safety)
- Luminous Engine Codex Crisis Simulation (4/4 passed, 23min mean detect)
- Omni-Sentinel Financial Services & G-SIFI governance (FCRA, ECOA, Basel III)
- 15 Cross-Domain Controls Library with regulatory mapping
- Investment Summary (.89M 3-year, 2.4M NPV, MVAGS 00K)
- 18-Month Strategic Roadmap (6 quarterly milestones)
- Project Veridical validation proof point (94.2% accuracy, 3.0x ROI)
Server (server.js): 7,115 lines
- AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED data object expanded with 8 new sub-objects:
riskRegister, sentinelTelemetry, crisisSimulation, roadmap,
registryApi, educationSystems, veridicalValidation, financialServices
- 27 API endpoints (14 existing + 13 new v2.0 endpoints)
- /api/agi-governance-unified/summary aggregation endpoint
XML Specification:
- docs/specifications/agi-governance-unified-framework.xml added
Regression Testing: 61 endpoints tested, 61 HTTP 200 (27 governance + 34 historical)
Browser Validation: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 9.19s load, page title confirmed
Frameworks covered: EU AI Act (Reg. 2024/1689), NIST AI RMF 1.0, ISO/IEC 42001:2023,
OECD AI Principles, GDPR, FCRA, ECOA, Bletchley Declaration, Seoul Commitments
Programmes covered: Nexus, Chimera, NPGARS, UDIF, GDII, Luminous Engine Codex
Architectures: WorkflowAI Pro, EAIP, Sentinel v2.4, Veridical RAG, CCaaS
Systems: Sentinel, GSIIEN, Kyaw Stack, HELIOS, ORION, Omni-Sentinel
|
The files' contents are under analysis for test generation. |
|
Review changes with Changed Files
|
|
Review these changes at https://app.gitnotebooks.com/OneFineStarstuff/OneFineStarstuff.github.io/pull/40 |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Reviewer's GuideImplements the Unified AGI/ASI Governance Framework v2.0 by adding a large, structured AGI governance data model to the backend, exposing it via 27 read‑only API endpoints, and introducing a new front-end HTML executive dashboard plus an XML specification document that render and document this governance information for board-level consumers. Sequence diagram for loading the unified AGI governance dashboardsequenceDiagram
actor BoardUser
participant Browser as BrowserDashboard
participant Server as NodeServer
participant Model as AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED
BoardUser->>Browser: Open agi-governance-unified.html
Browser->>Server: HTTP GET /agi-governance-unified.html
Server-->>Browser: HTML dashboard
BoardUser->>Browser: View dashboard sections
par Load_summary
Browser->>Server: GET /api/agi-governance-unified/summary
Server->>Model: Read summary fields
Model-->>Server: Summary data
Server-->>Browser: JSON summary
and Load_domains
Browser->>Server: GET /api/agi-governance-unified/domains
Server->>Model: Read domains
Model-->>Server: Domains array
Server-->>Browser: JSON {domains}
and Load_readiness
Browser->>Server: GET /api/agi-governance-unified/readiness
Server->>Model: Read enterpriseReadiness
Model-->>Server: Readiness object
Server-->>Browser: JSON {readiness}
and Load_risks
Browser->>Server: GET /api/agi-governance-unified/risks/active
Server->>Model: Read riskRegister.active
Model-->>Server: Active risks
Server-->>Browser: JSON {active}
and Load_sentinel
Browser->>Server: GET /api/agi-governance-unified/sentinel-telemetry
Server->>Model: Read sentinelTelemetry
Model-->>Server: Telemetry object
Server-->>Browser: JSON {telemetry}
end
Browser-->>BoardUser: Render metrics, domains, risks, telemetry
Sequence diagram for control lookup via new control-by-id endpointsequenceDiagram
participant Client as GovernanceClient
participant Server as NodeServer
participant Model as AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED
Client->>Server: GET /api/agi-governance-unified/controls/CTRL-010
Server->>Model: Find control where id == CTRL-010
Model-->>Server: Control object
Server-->>Client: 200 OK JSON control
Client->>Server: GET /api/agi-governance-unified/controls/CTRL-999
Server->>Model: Find control where id == CTRL-999
Model-->>Server: Not found
Server-->>Client: 404 Not Found {error: Control not found}
Class diagram for AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED backend data modelclassDiagram
class AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED {
+meta meta
+domains Domain[]
+enterpriseReadiness EnterpriseReadiness
+complianceMatrix ComplianceMatrix
+sentinel SentinelOverview
+evolutionModel EvolutionModel
+architectures ArchitectureItem[]
+cognitiveResonance CognitiveResonance
+openFutureDoctrine OpenFutureDoctrine
+mvags MVAGS
+investment InvestmentPlan
+controls Control[]
+riskRegister RiskRegister
+sentinelTelemetry SentinelTelemetry
+crisisSimulation CrisisSimulation
+roadmap Roadmap
+registryApi RegistryApi
+educationSystems EducationSystems
+veridicalValidation VeridicalValidation
+financialServices FinancialServices
}
class meta {
+docRef string
+title string
+shortTitle string
+classification string
+version string
+date string
+author string
+audience string[]
+companionDocuments string[]
+frameworks string[]
+integrationDomains number
+nextReview string
}
class Domain {
+id string
+name string
+status string
+maturity string
}
class EnterpriseReadiness {
+currentLevel number
+targetLevel number
+targetDate string
+levels ReadinessLevel[]
}
class ReadinessLevel {
+level number
+name string
+description string
}
class ComplianceMatrix {
+programmes ProgrammeCompliance[]
+iso42001Status ISOStatus
}
class ProgrammeCompliance {
+name string
+euAiAct string
+nist string
+iso42001 string
+gdpr string
+fcra string
+ecoa string
}
class ISOStatus {
+implemented number
+partial number
+pending number
+evidence string
}
class SentinelOverview {
+version string
+systemsMonitored number
+policyEvaluationsPerDay number
+p99PolicyLatencyMs number
+falsePositiveRate number
+governanceRules number
+policyDomains number
+incidentsDetected number
+autoRemediated number
+escalated number
}
class EvolutionModel {
+stages EvolutionStage[]
+currentStage string
+frontierCapabilities FrontierCapabilities
}
class EvolutionStage {
+stage number
+name string
+timeline string
+euTier string
+controlLevel string
}
class FrontierCapabilities {
+arcAgi2 string
+frontierMath string
+sweBenchVerified string
}
class ArchitectureItem {
+name string
+spec string
+riskTier string
+sentinelIntegration string
+status string
}
class CognitiveResonance {
+principles CRPrinciple[]
+roadmap CRRoadmapItem[]
}
class CRPrinciple {
+id string
+name string
+description string
}
class CRRoadmapItem {
+quarter string
+milestone string
+status string
}
class OpenFutureDoctrine {
+constraints OFDConstraint[]
}
class OFDConstraint {
+id string
+name string
+description string
}
class MVAGS {
+totalCost string
+components MVAGSComponent[]
}
class MVAGSComponent {
+name string
+cost string
+implementation string
}
class InvestmentPlan {
+year1 string
+year2 string
+year3 string
+total string
+roiProjection string
+breakdown InvestmentCategory[]
}
class InvestmentCategory {
+category string
+year1 number
+year2 number
+year3 number
+total number
}
class Control {
+id string
+name string
+domains string
+euAiAct string
+nist string
+iso string
}
class RiskRegister {
+active ActiveRisk[]
+closed ClosedRisk[]
}
class ActiveRisk {
+id string
+severity string
+name string
+description string
+mitigation string
+owner string
+status string
}
class ClosedRisk {
+id string
+name string
+resolution string
+closedDate string
}
class SentinelTelemetry {
+version string
+systemsMonitored number
+policyEvaluationsPerDay number
+p99PolicyLatencyMs number
+falsePositiveRate number
+governanceRules number
+policyDomains number
+autoRemediationRate number
+incidentSummary TelemetryIncidentSummary
+policyDomainBreakdown TelemetryDomainStat[]
}
class TelemetryIncidentSummary {
+detected number
+autoRemediated number
+escalated number
+meanDetectMin number
+meanRemediateMin number
}
class TelemetryDomainStat {
+domain string
+rules number
+evalsPerDay number
}
class CrisisSimulation {
+cadence string
+totalExecuted number
+passRate number
+scenarios CrisisScenario[]
+nextScenario NextScenario
+meanDetectMin number
+boardPlaybooksValidated boolean
}
class CrisisScenario {
+name string
+date string
+detectMin number
+containMin number
+result string
}
class NextScenario {
+name string
+scheduled string
}
class Roadmap {
+totalQuarters number
+milestones RoadmapMilestone[]
}
class RoadmapMilestone {
+quarter string
+name string
+status string
+details string
}
class RegistryApi {
+version string
+status string
+endpoints RegistryEndpoint[]
+computeTiers ComputeTier[]
}
class RegistryEndpoint {
+path string
+method string
+purpose string
}
class ComputeTier {
+flop string
+tier string
+controls string
}
class EducationSystems {
+gsiien EducationItem
+kyawStack EducationItem
+helios EducationItem
+orion EducationItem
}
class EducationItem {
+name string
+partnersEngaged number
+pilotDate string
+status string
+layers string[]
+investment string
+rolloutDate string
+playbooks number
+crisisSimsCompleted number
}
class VeridicalValidation {
+programme string
+weeks number
+status string
+releaseDate string
+day1Queries number
+productionIncidents number
+metrics VeridicalMetrics
+financials VeridicalFinancials
+risksClosedCount number
+csat number
}
class VeridicalMetrics {
+accuracy VeridicalMetricItem
+latencyP95 VeridicalMetricItem
+costPerQuery VeridicalMetricItem
+uptime VeridicalMetricItem
+users VeridicalUserMetric
+corpus VeridicalMetricItem
}
class VeridicalMetricItem {
+start number
+end number
+gate number
+unit string
+value number
}
class VeridicalUserMetric {
+start number
+end number
+departments number
}
class VeridicalFinancials {
+budget number
+spent number
+cpi number
+returned number
+roi number
+npv3yr number
+paybackMonths number
+ltv5yr number
}
class FinancialServices {
+omniSentinel OmniSentinelStatus
+complianceMapping FinancialComplianceItem[]
}
class OmniSentinelStatus {
+status string
+targetDeployment string
}
class FinancialComplianceItem {
+requirement string
+framework string
+controls string
+status string
}
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> meta
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> Domain
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> EnterpriseReadiness
EnterpriseReadiness --> ReadinessLevel
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> ComplianceMatrix
ComplianceMatrix --> ProgrammeCompliance
ComplianceMatrix --> ISOStatus
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> SentinelOverview
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> EvolutionModel
EvolutionModel --> EvolutionStage
EvolutionModel --> FrontierCapabilities
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> ArchitectureItem
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> CognitiveResonance
CognitiveResonance --> CRPrinciple
CognitiveResonance --> CRRoadmapItem
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> OpenFutureDoctrine
OpenFutureDoctrine --> OFDConstraint
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> MVAGS
MVAGS --> MVAGSComponent
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> InvestmentPlan
InvestmentPlan --> InvestmentCategory
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> Control
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> RiskRegister
RiskRegister --> ActiveRisk
RiskRegister --> ClosedRisk
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> SentinelTelemetry
SentinelTelemetry --> TelemetryIncidentSummary
SentinelTelemetry --> TelemetryDomainStat
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> CrisisSimulation
CrisisSimulation --> CrisisScenario
CrisisSimulation --> NextScenario
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> Roadmap
Roadmap --> RoadmapMilestone
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> RegistryApi
RegistryApi --> RegistryEndpoint
RegistryApi --> ComputeTier
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> EducationSystems
EducationSystems --> EducationItem
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> VeridicalValidation
VeridicalValidation --> VeridicalMetrics
VeridicalValidation --> VeridicalFinancials
VeridicalMetrics --> VeridicalMetricItem
VeridicalMetrics --> VeridicalUserMetric
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED --> FinancialServices
FinancialServices --> OmniSentinelStatus
FinancialServices --> FinancialComplianceItem
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
View changes in DiffLens |
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR adds a comprehensive AGI/ASI governance framework across three formats: an XML specification document defining regulatory compliance mappings, functional controls, and governance architectures; a static HTML dashboard for visualization; and REST API endpoints serving the framework as structured JSON data. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
❌ Deploy Preview for onefinestarstuff failed.
|
|
View changes in DiffLens |
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've found 2 issues, and left some high level feedback:
- The
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIEDobject is very large and embedded directly inserver.js; consider extracting it into a separate configuration/module (or JSON) so the server bootstrap file stays small and the data can be more easily reused or edited independently. - Several numeric fields in
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED(e.g., costs, budgets, investments) are stored as formatted strings with currency symbols mixed with plain numbers, which will make programmatic consumption and aggregation harder—normalising these to numeric values and formatting them only at the presentation layer would simplify downstream usage. - There is substantial duplication of governance data and narrative across the JS object, the HTML dashboard, and the XML specification; introducing a single source of truth (e.g., generating one or more of these artifacts from the same structured data) would reduce the risk of divergence over time.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- The `AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED` object is very large and embedded directly in `server.js`; consider extracting it into a separate configuration/module (or JSON) so the server bootstrap file stays small and the data can be more easily reused or edited independently.
- Several numeric fields in `AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED` (e.g., costs, budgets, investments) are stored as formatted strings with currency symbols mixed with plain numbers, which will make programmatic consumption and aggregation harder—normalising these to numeric values and formatting them only at the presentation layer would simplify downstream usage.
- There is substantial duplication of governance data and narrative across the JS object, the HTML dashboard, and the XML specification; introducing a single source of truth (e.g., generating one or more of these artifacts from the same structured data) would reduce the risk of divergence over time.
## Individual Comments
### Comment 1
<location path="rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js" line_range="6804-6764" />
<code_context>
+ iso42001Status: { implemented: 93, partial: 5, pending: 2, evidence: 'Control-by-control evidence package maintained' }
+ },
+
+ sentinel: {
+ version: '2.4',
+ systemsMonitored: 22,
+ policyEvaluationsPerDay: 1200000,
+ p99PolicyLatencyMs: 38,
+ falsePositiveRate: 0.003,
+ governanceRules: 847,
+ policyDomains: 12,
+ incidentsDetected: 14,
+ autoRemediated: 12,
+ escalated: 2
+ },
+
+ evolutionModel: {
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**issue (bug_risk):** Sentinel metrics are duplicated in both `sentinel` and `sentinelTelemetry`, increasing the risk of divergence over time.
Fields like `systemsMonitored`, `policyEvaluationsPerDay`, `p99PolicyLatencyMs`, and `governanceRules` are defined in both objects. If one is updated without the other, `/sentinel` and `/sentinel-telemetry` may return conflicting data. Consider having `sentinelTelemetry` reference `sentinel` for shared fields, or deriving both from a single source object to keep them consistent.
</issue_to_address>
### Comment 2
<location path="rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js" line_range="6750" />
<code_context>
+// UNIFIED AGI/ASI GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK (SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001)
+// ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
+
+const AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED = {
+ meta: {
+ docRef: 'SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001',
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**issue (complexity):** Consider extracting the large AGI governance spec object into its own module and registering its many simple GET endpoints via a small route table to keep server.js focused and less repetitive.
You can keep all functionality while reducing `server.js` complexity by:
1. Extracting the large spec object into its own module.
2. DRY-ing the repetitive read-only routes via a small route descriptor table.
### 1. Move `AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED` into a dedicated module
Create `config/agiGovernanceUnified.js` (or similar):
```js
// config/agiGovernanceUnified.js
const AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED = {
meta: {
docRef: 'SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001',
title: 'Unified AGI/ASI Governance, Enterprise AI Transformation, and Civilisational Safety Framework',
// ...rest of meta
},
domains: [
{ id: 'D1', name: 'Enterprise AGI/ASI Governance Strategy & Communication', /* ... */ },
// ...rest of object exactly as in server.js
],
// ...all other sections (enterpriseReadiness, complianceMatrix, sentinel, etc.)
};
module.exports = { AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED };
```
Then in `server.js`:
```js
// near top of file (or section header)
const { AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED } = require('./config/agiGovernanceUnified');
```
This keeps `server.js` focused on wiring and makes the spec easier to navigate/edit.
### 2. Factor the boilerplate GET endpoints
Most endpoints are of the form `res.json({ key: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.path })` or `res.json(AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.path)`. You can register them via a small table while keeping all response shapes identical.
```js
// server.js
const unifiedBase = '/api/agi-governance-unified';
const unifiedRoutes = [
{ path: '/', select: agi => agi },
{ path: '/meta', select: agi => agi.meta },
{ path: '/domains', select: agi => ({ domains: agi.domains }) },
{ path: '/readiness', select: agi => ({ readiness: agi.enterpriseReadiness }) },
{ path: '/compliance', select: agi => ({ compliance: agi.complianceMatrix }) },
{ path: '/sentinel', select: agi => ({ sentinel: agi.sentinel }) },
{ path: '/evolution', select: agi => ({ evolution: agi.evolutionModel }) },
{ path: '/architectures', select: agi => ({ architectures: agi.architectures }) },
{ path: '/cognitive-resonance', select: agi => ({ cognitiveResonance: agi.cognitiveResonance }) },
{ path: '/open-future', select: agi => ({ openFutureDoctrine: agi.openFutureDoctrine }) },
{ path: '/mvags', select: agi => ({ mvags: agi.mvags }) },
{ path: '/investment', select: agi => ({ investment: agi.investment }) },
{ path: '/controls', select: agi => ({ controls: agi.controls }) },
{ path: '/risks', select: agi => ({ risks: agi.riskRegister }) },
{ path: '/risks/active', select: agi => ({ active: agi.riskRegister.active }) },
{ path: '/risks/closed', select: agi => ({ closed: agi.riskRegister.closed }) },
{ path: '/sentinel-telemetry', select: agi => ({ telemetry: agi.sentinelTelemetry }) },
{ path: '/sentinel-telemetry/domains', select: agi => ({ domains: agi.sentinelTelemetry.policyDomainBreakdown }) },
{ path: '/crisis-simulation', select: agi => ({ crisisSimulation: agi.crisisSimulation }) },
{ path: '/roadmap', select: agi => ({ roadmap: agi.roadmap }) },
{ path: '/registry-api', select: agi => ({ registryApi: agi.registryApi }) },
{ path: '/education', select: agi => ({ education: agi.educationSystems }) },
{ path: '/veridical', select: agi => ({ veridical: agi.veridicalValidation }) },
{ path: '/financial-services', select: agi => ({ financialServices: agi.financialServices }) },
];
unifiedRoutes.forEach(({ path, select }) => {
app.get(`${unifiedBase}${path}`, (_, res) => {
res.json(select(AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED));
});
});
// keep custom logic endpoints separate
app.get(`${unifiedBase}/controls/:id`, (req, res) => {
const ctrl = AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.controls.find(
c => c.id === req.params.id.toUpperCase()
);
return ctrl ? res.json(ctrl) : res.status(404).json({ error: 'Control not found' });
});
app.get(`${unifiedBase}/summary`, (_, res) => {
const agi = AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED;
res.json({
docRef: agi.meta.docRef,
version: agi.meta.version,
earlLevel: agi.enterpriseReadiness.currentLevel,
domainCount: agi.domains.length,
frameworkCount: agi.meta.frameworks.length,
controlCount: agi.controls.length,
sentinelVersion: agi.sentinel.version,
systemsMonitored: agi.sentinel.systemsMonitored,
policyRules: agi.sentinel.governanceRules,
iso42001Pct: agi.complianceMatrix.iso42001Status.implemented,
activeRisks: agi.riskRegister.active.length,
closedRisks: agi.riskRegister.closed.length,
crisisSimsPassed: agi.crisisSimulation.totalExecuted,
veridicalStatus: agi.veridicalValidation.status,
totalInvestment: agi.investment.total,
});
});
```
This keeps all current response payloads and URLs unchanged, but reduces duplication and makes future changes (e.g. new sections/endpoints) easier and safer to manage.
</issue_to_address>Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
| frameworks: ['EU AI Act (Reg. 2024/1689)', 'NIST AI RMF 1.0', 'ISO/IEC 42001:2023', 'OECD AI Principles', 'GDPR', 'FCRA', 'ECOA', 'Bletchley Declaration 2023', 'Seoul Frontier AI Safety Commitments 2024'], | ||
| integrationDomains: 10, | ||
| nextReview: '2026-06-21' | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (bug_risk): Sentinel metrics are duplicated in both sentinel and sentinelTelemetry, increasing the risk of divergence over time.
Fields like systemsMonitored, policyEvaluationsPerDay, p99PolicyLatencyMs, and governanceRules are defined in both objects. If one is updated without the other, /sentinel and /sentinel-telemetry may return conflicting data. Consider having sentinelTelemetry reference sentinel for shared fields, or deriving both from a single source object to keep them consistent.
| // UNIFIED AGI/ASI GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK (SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001) | ||
| // ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ | ||
|
|
||
| const AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (complexity): Consider extracting the large AGI governance spec object into its own module and registering its many simple GET endpoints via a small route table to keep server.js focused and less repetitive.
You can keep all functionality while reducing server.js complexity by:
- Extracting the large spec object into its own module.
- DRY-ing the repetitive read-only routes via a small route descriptor table.
1. Move AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED into a dedicated module
Create config/agiGovernanceUnified.js (or similar):
// config/agiGovernanceUnified.js
const AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED = {
meta: {
docRef: 'SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001',
title: 'Unified AGI/ASI Governance, Enterprise AI Transformation, and Civilisational Safety Framework',
// ...rest of meta
},
domains: [
{ id: 'D1', name: 'Enterprise AGI/ASI Governance Strategy & Communication', /* ... */ },
// ...rest of object exactly as in server.js
],
// ...all other sections (enterpriseReadiness, complianceMatrix, sentinel, etc.)
};
module.exports = { AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED };Then in server.js:
// near top of file (or section header)
const { AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED } = require('./config/agiGovernanceUnified');This keeps server.js focused on wiring and makes the spec easier to navigate/edit.
2. Factor the boilerplate GET endpoints
Most endpoints are of the form res.json({ key: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.path }) or res.json(AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.path). You can register them via a small table while keeping all response shapes identical.
// server.js
const unifiedBase = '/api/agi-governance-unified';
const unifiedRoutes = [
{ path: '/', select: agi => agi },
{ path: '/meta', select: agi => agi.meta },
{ path: '/domains', select: agi => ({ domains: agi.domains }) },
{ path: '/readiness', select: agi => ({ readiness: agi.enterpriseReadiness }) },
{ path: '/compliance', select: agi => ({ compliance: agi.complianceMatrix }) },
{ path: '/sentinel', select: agi => ({ sentinel: agi.sentinel }) },
{ path: '/evolution', select: agi => ({ evolution: agi.evolutionModel }) },
{ path: '/architectures', select: agi => ({ architectures: agi.architectures }) },
{ path: '/cognitive-resonance', select: agi => ({ cognitiveResonance: agi.cognitiveResonance }) },
{ path: '/open-future', select: agi => ({ openFutureDoctrine: agi.openFutureDoctrine }) },
{ path: '/mvags', select: agi => ({ mvags: agi.mvags }) },
{ path: '/investment', select: agi => ({ investment: agi.investment }) },
{ path: '/controls', select: agi => ({ controls: agi.controls }) },
{ path: '/risks', select: agi => ({ risks: agi.riskRegister }) },
{ path: '/risks/active', select: agi => ({ active: agi.riskRegister.active }) },
{ path: '/risks/closed', select: agi => ({ closed: agi.riskRegister.closed }) },
{ path: '/sentinel-telemetry', select: agi => ({ telemetry: agi.sentinelTelemetry }) },
{ path: '/sentinel-telemetry/domains', select: agi => ({ domains: agi.sentinelTelemetry.policyDomainBreakdown }) },
{ path: '/crisis-simulation', select: agi => ({ crisisSimulation: agi.crisisSimulation }) },
{ path: '/roadmap', select: agi => ({ roadmap: agi.roadmap }) },
{ path: '/registry-api', select: agi => ({ registryApi: agi.registryApi }) },
{ path: '/education', select: agi => ({ education: agi.educationSystems }) },
{ path: '/veridical', select: agi => ({ veridical: agi.veridicalValidation }) },
{ path: '/financial-services', select: agi => ({ financialServices: agi.financialServices }) },
];
unifiedRoutes.forEach(({ path, select }) => {
app.get(`${unifiedBase}${path}`, (_, res) => {
res.json(select(AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED));
});
});
// keep custom logic endpoints separate
app.get(`${unifiedBase}/controls/:id`, (req, res) => {
const ctrl = AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.controls.find(
c => c.id === req.params.id.toUpperCase()
);
return ctrl ? res.json(ctrl) : res.status(404).json({ error: 'Control not found' });
});
app.get(`${unifiedBase}/summary`, (_, res) => {
const agi = AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED;
res.json({
docRef: agi.meta.docRef,
version: agi.meta.version,
earlLevel: agi.enterpriseReadiness.currentLevel,
domainCount: agi.domains.length,
frameworkCount: agi.meta.frameworks.length,
controlCount: agi.controls.length,
sentinelVersion: agi.sentinel.version,
systemsMonitored: agi.sentinel.systemsMonitored,
policyRules: agi.sentinel.governanceRules,
iso42001Pct: agi.complianceMatrix.iso42001Status.implemented,
activeRisks: agi.riskRegister.active.length,
closedRisks: agi.riskRegister.closed.length,
crisisSimsPassed: agi.crisisSimulation.totalExecuted,
veridicalStatus: agi.veridicalValidation.status,
totalInvestment: agi.investment.total,
});
});This keeps all current response payloads and URLs unchanged, but reduces duplication and makes future changes (e.g. new sections/endpoints) easier and safer to manage.
|
View changes in DiffLens |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js (1)
795-801:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 MajorHandle malformed WebSocket payloads instead of swallowing them.
Line 801’s empty
catchalready fails Deno lint, and it also gives clients no protocol error when JSON parsing fails. Return an error frame and log the parse failure so CI passes and bad payloads are visible.🛠️ Minimal fix
ws.on('message', (msg) => { try { const data = JSON.parse(msg); if (data.type === 'COMMAND') handleCommand(ws, data); if (data.type === 'QUERY') handleNLQuery(ws, data); if (data.type === 'EVALUATE_DIRECTIVE') handleDirectiveEval(ws, data); - } catch (e) {} + } catch (e) { + ws.send(JSON.stringify({ + type: 'ERROR', + error: 'Invalid WebSocket payload' + })); + console.warn('[WS] Failed to parse client message', { + clientId, + error: e.message + }); + } });🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js` around lines 795 - 801, The message handler currently swallows JSON parse errors; update the ws.on('message', (msg) => { ... }) block to catch exceptions from JSON.parse and (1) log the parse error (include the thrown error and the raw msg) and (2) send a protocol error frame back to the client (e.g., a JSON message with type "ERROR" and an error message) instead of an empty catch. Ensure you still call handleCommand, handleNLQuery, and handleDirectiveEval for valid payloads, and keep the try/catch limited to JSON.parse and validation so legitimate errors in those handlers propagate or are handled separately.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
rag-agentic-dashboard/public/agi-governance-unified.html (1)
196-210: Consider addingscopeattributes to table headers for accessibility.The data tables throughout the dashboard (e.g., the 10-stage evolution model table here) lack
scope="col"attributes on<th>elements. While this is a minor accessibility improvement for screen reader users navigating tabular data, it's a quick enhancement.♿ Proposed accessibility improvement
-<thead><tr><th>Stage</th><th>Name</th><th>Timeline</th><th>EU AI Act Tier</th><th>Governance Controls</th><th>Alignment Challenge</th></tr></thead> +<thead><tr><th scope="col">Stage</th><th scope="col">Name</th><th scope="col">Timeline</th><th scope="col">EU AI Act Tier</th><th scope="col">Governance Controls</th><th scope="col">Alignment Challenge</th></tr></thead>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/public/agi-governance-unified.html` around lines 196 - 210, The table header <th> elements in the 10-stage evolution model (the <table class="tbl"> block) lack scope attributes which impairs screen-reader column association; add scope="col" to each <th> in the <thead> row (Stage, Name, Timeline, EU AI Act Tier, Governance Controls, Alignment Challenge), and where appropriate mark first-cell row headers (e.g., the "Stage" cells in each <tr>) with scope="row" to improve accessibility and navigation for assistive technologies.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/specifications/agi-governance-unified-framework.xml`:
- Line 16: Update the version inside the CDATA markdown so it matches the
dashboard's v2.0: locate the CDATA block containing the string
"SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001 v1.0.0" and change it to "SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001 v2.0"
(and any other in-CDATA occurrences of "v1.0.0") to keep the document reference
consistent with the HTML/dashboard references.
- Around line 2-7: Update the root element attributes to match the dashboard and
PR by changing version="1.0.0" to version="2.0.0" (keeping
docRef="SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001" as-is), and address the unused xmlns:xsi
declaration by either removing
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" if you don’t need XML
Schema features, or add an appropriate xsi:schemaLocation value (and any
required xsi:type usages) so the namespace is actually used; locate these in the
root <specification> element where the version and xmlns:xsi are defined.
In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js`:
- Around line 6751-6759: The mounted routes under
'/api/agi-governance-unified/*' are exposed without authorization; wrap the
route registration so every endpoint uses the existing auth layer (e.g., apply
the project's authentication/authorization middleware such as requireAuth,
verifyJwt, authorizeRole, or the central auth router) before the router is
attached to the app. Concretely, locate where the router or handlers for
'/api/agi-governance-unified' are registered (the app.use or router mounting
code that adds those routes) and modify it to insert the auth middleware chain
(and role/claim checks for board-level access) so only authorized callers can
reach the risk register, simulations, projections and compliance endpoints, or
alternatively register a redacted, public router if full data cannot be exposed.
- Around line 6964-6977: The summary currently uses
crisisSimulation.totalExecuted to report passed sims; update the logic to
compute crisisSimsPassed by counting scenarios with result === 'PASS' (e.g.,
iterate crisisSimulation.scenarios and count where scenario.result === 'PASS')
and use that derived value in the summary/reporting code instead of
crisisSimulation.totalExecuted; ensure any place referencing crisisSimsPassed
(or the summary generation function that reads crisisSimulation) is updated to
use the new counted value and consider keeping totalExecuted as a separate field
if both numbers are needed.
---
Outside diff comments:
In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js`:
- Around line 795-801: The message handler currently swallows JSON parse errors;
update the ws.on('message', (msg) => { ... }) block to catch exceptions from
JSON.parse and (1) log the parse error (include the thrown error and the raw
msg) and (2) send a protocol error frame back to the client (e.g., a JSON
message with type "ERROR" and an error message) instead of an empty catch.
Ensure you still call handleCommand, handleNLQuery, and handleDirectiveEval for
valid payloads, and keep the try/catch limited to JSON.parse and validation so
legitimate errors in those handlers propagate or are handled separately.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/public/agi-governance-unified.html`:
- Around line 196-210: The table header <th> elements in the 10-stage evolution
model (the <table class="tbl"> block) lack scope attributes which impairs
screen-reader column association; add scope="col" to each <th> in the <thead>
row (Stage, Name, Timeline, EU AI Act Tier, Governance Controls, Alignment
Challenge), and where appropriate mark first-cell row headers (e.g., the "Stage"
cells in each <tr>) with scope="row" to improve accessibility and navigation for
assistive technologies.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 51230cc9-f88c-4ad7-9926-db442d3e1217
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
docs/specifications/agi-governance-unified-framework.xmlrag-agentic-dashboard/public/agi-governance-unified.htmlrag-agentic-dashboard/server.js
Comment on lines
+2
to
+7
| <specification xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" | ||
| version="1.0.0" | ||
| status="DRAFT" | ||
| classification="STRATEGIC — Board-Level / Restricted Distribution" | ||
| docRef="SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001" | ||
| date="2026-03-21"> |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Version mismatch between XML specification and HTML dashboard.
The XML specification declares version="1.0.0" in the root element, but the HTML dashboard and PR description reference v2.0.0 (SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001 v2.0). This inconsistency could cause confusion when correlating the specification with the dashboard.
Additionally, xmlns:xsi is declared but never used — no xsi:schemaLocation or xsi:type attributes are present.
🔧 Proposed fix for version consistency
<specification xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
- version="1.0.0"
+ version="2.0.0"
status="DRAFT"
classification="STRATEGIC — Board-Level / Restricted Distribution"
docRef="SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001"
date="2026-03-21">📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| <specification xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" | |
| version="1.0.0" | |
| status="DRAFT" | |
| classification="STRATEGIC — Board-Level / Restricted Distribution" | |
| docRef="SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001" | |
| date="2026-03-21"> | |
| <specification xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" | |
| version="2.0.0" | |
| status="DRAFT" | |
| classification="STRATEGIC — Board-Level / Restricted Distribution" | |
| docRef="SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001" | |
| date="2026-03-21"> |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@docs/specifications/agi-governance-unified-framework.xml` around lines 2 - 7,
Update the root element attributes to match the dashboard and PR by changing
version="1.0.0" to version="2.0.0" (keeping docRef="SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001"
as-is), and address the unused xmlns:xsi declaration by either removing
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" if you don’t need XML
Schema features, or add an appropriate xsi:schemaLocation value (and any
required xsi:type usages) so the namespace is actually used; locate these in the
root <specification> element where the version and xmlns:xsi are defined.
| <content><![CDATA[ | ||
| # Unified AGI/ASI Governance, Enterprise AI Transformation, and Civilisational Safety Framework | ||
|
|
||
| **Document Reference:** SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001 v1.0.0 |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Document reference version also shows 1.0.0 inside CDATA content.
The Markdown content within the CDATA section also states SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001 v1.0.0, compounding the version mismatch with the HTML dashboard's v2.0 references.
🔧 Proposed fix
-**Document Reference:** SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001 v1.0.0
+**Document Reference:** SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001 v2.0.0📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| **Document Reference:** SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001 v1.0.0 | |
| **Document Reference:** SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001 v2.0.0 |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@docs/specifications/agi-governance-unified-framework.xml` at line 16, Update
the version inside the CDATA markdown so it matches the dashboard's v2.0: locate
the CDATA block containing the string "SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001 v1.0.0" and
change it to "SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001 v2.0" (and any other in-CDATA occurrences
of "v1.0.0") to keep the document reference consistent with the HTML/dashboard
references.
Comment on lines
+6751
to
+6759
| meta: { | ||
| docRef: 'SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001', | ||
| title: 'Unified AGI/ASI Governance, Enterprise AI Transformation, and Civilisational Safety Framework', | ||
| shortTitle: 'Unified AGI Governance Framework', | ||
| classification: 'STRATEGIC — Board-Level / Restricted Distribution', | ||
| version: '2.0.0', | ||
| date: '2026-03-21', | ||
| author: 'Chief Software Architect, AI Systems Engineering, AI Governance & Technical Strategy Office', | ||
| audience: ['CTO', 'VP Engineering', 'VP AI Platform', 'Chief AI Officer', 'Chief Risk Officer', 'General Counsel', 'Board of Directors'], |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Protect the unified governance routes with authorization.
Line 6755 marks this dataset as board-level / restricted, but Lines 7048-7094 mount every /api/agi-governance-unified/* route directly on the app with no authz. That exposes the risk register, crisis simulations, financial projections, and compliance posture to any caller if the service is reachable. Gate this surface behind the existing authorization layer, or publish a separately redacted projection.
Also applies to: 7048-7094
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js` around lines 6751 - 6759, The mounted routes
under '/api/agi-governance-unified/*' are exposed without authorization; wrap
the route registration so every endpoint uses the existing auth layer (e.g.,
apply the project's authentication/authorization middleware such as requireAuth,
verifyJwt, authorizeRole, or the central auth router) before the router is
attached to the app. Concretely, locate where the router or handlers for
'/api/agi-governance-unified' are registered (the app.use or router mounting
code that adds those routes) and modify it to insert the auth middleware chain
(and role/claim checks for board-level access) so only authorized callers can
reach the risk register, simulations, projections and compliance endpoints, or
alternatively register a redacted, public router if full data cannot be exposed.
Comment on lines
+6964
to
+6977
| crisisSimulation: { | ||
| cadence: 'Quarterly', | ||
| totalExecuted: 4, | ||
| passRate: 1.0, | ||
| scenarios: [ | ||
| { name: 'Data Exfiltration via RAG', date: '2026-01-15', detectMin: 18, containMin: 42, result: 'PASS' }, | ||
| { name: 'Model Poisoning Attack', date: '2026-02-12', detectMin: 26, containMin: 58, result: 'PASS' }, | ||
| { name: 'Agentic Goal Drift (Stage 5)', date: '2026-03-05', detectMin: 12, containMin: 8, result: 'PASS' }, | ||
| { name: 'Regulatory Compliance Breach', date: '2026-03-19', detectMin: 34, containMin: 22, result: 'PASS' } | ||
| ], | ||
| nextScenario: { name: 'Narrow Superintelligence Misalignment (Stage 6)', scheduled: 'Q2 2026' }, | ||
| meanDetectMin: 23, | ||
| boardPlaybooksValidated: true | ||
| }, |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Derive crisisSimsPassed from passed scenarios, not executions.
Line 7091 currently uses crisisSimulation.totalExecuted, so the summary will over-report passes as soon as a simulation fails. Count PASS results explicitly, or expose both executed and passed totals.
🧮 Minimal fix
app.get('/api/agi-governance-unified/summary', (_, res) => res.json({
docRef: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.meta.docRef,
version: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.meta.version,
earlLevel: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.enterpriseReadiness.currentLevel,
domainCount: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.domains.length,
frameworkCount: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.meta.frameworks.length,
controlCount: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.controls.length,
sentinelVersion: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.sentinel.version,
systemsMonitored: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.sentinel.systemsMonitored,
policyRules: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.sentinel.governanceRules,
iso42001Pct: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.complianceMatrix.iso42001Status.implemented,
activeRisks: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.riskRegister.active.length,
closedRisks: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.riskRegister.closed.length,
- crisisSimsPassed: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.crisisSimulation.totalExecuted,
+ crisisSimsPassed: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.crisisSimulation.scenarios.filter(
+ (scenario) => scenario.result === 'PASS'
+ ).length,
veridicalStatus: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.veridicalValidation.status,
totalInvestment: AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIED.investment.total
}));Also applies to: 7077-7094
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js` around lines 6964 - 6977, The summary
currently uses crisisSimulation.totalExecuted to report passed sims; update the
logic to compute crisisSimsPassed by counting scenarios with result === 'PASS'
(e.g., iterate crisisSimulation.scenarios and count where scenario.result ===
'PASS') and use that derived value in the summary/reporting code instead of
crisisSimulation.totalExecuted; ensure any place referencing crisisSimsPassed
(or the summary generation function that reads crisisSimulation) is updated to
use the new counted value and consider keeping totalExecuted as a separate field
if both numbers are needed.
|
View changes in DiffLens |
Contributor
PR Review 🔍
|
Contributor
PR Code Suggestions ✨No code suggestions found for PR. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
User description
SPEC-AGIGOV-UNIFIED-001 v2.0.0
Unified AGI/ASI Governance, Enterprise AI Transformation & Civilisational Safety Framework
Comprehensive strategic analysis and implementation guidance for enterprise-standard AGI/ASI governance and communication architectures across 10 integration domains.
Files Changed
agi-governance-unified.htmlserver.jsagi-governance-unified-framework.xmlDashboard Sections (16)
Key Metrics
API Endpoints (27)
Regression Testing
Governance Scope
Programmes: Nexus, Chimera, NPGARS, UDIF, GDII, Luminous Engine Codex
Architectures: WorkflowAI Pro, EAIP, Sentinel v2.4, Veridical RAG, CCaaS
Systems: Sentinel, GSIIEN, Kyaw Stack, HELIOS, ORION, Omni-Sentinel
Frameworks: EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF 1.0, ISO/IEC 42001, OECD AI Principles, GDPR, FCRA, ECOA, Bletchley Declaration, Seoul Commitments
Summary by Sourcery
Add a unified AGI/ASI governance framework dataset, API surface, and executive dashboard for enterprise and civilisation-scale AI governance.
New Features:
Enhancements:
Documentation:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
New Features
Description
Changes walkthrough 📝
agi-governance-unified.html
Comprehensive Executive Governance Dashboard for AGI/ASIrag-agentic-dashboard/public/agi-governance-unified.html
frameworks.
server.js
Server Enhancements with New API Endpointsrag-agentic-dashboard/server.js
AGI_GOVERNANCE_UNIFIEDdata object with new sub-objects.agi-governance-unified-framework.xml
Specification Document for AGI Governance Frameworkdocs/specifications/agi-governance-unified-framework.xml