MREF-GSIFI-WP-023 — Institutional-Grade AGI/ASI Governance Master Reference 2026-2030#51
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…nitoring & Sentinel Engine, Data Infrastructure & Quality, Global Compute Governance Adds 4 deep governance modules completing the 6-layer multilayered AI governance architecture: ## Development & Deployment Governance (DDGOV-GSIFI-WP-019) - 21 API endpoints under /api/dev-deploy-governance/* - 7-stage CI/CD governance pipeline with 102 OPA rules - Model registry (847 models, 312 production, MLflow + OPA sidecar) - 4 deployment strategies (blue-green, canary, shadow, feature-flag) - 3 kill-switch types (model-level, system-level, regulatory) - DORA Elite metrics: 97.9% success rate, 12 min MTTR - Dashboard: dev-deploy-governance.html ## Monitoring & Observability Governance (MONGOV-GSIFI-WP-020) - 22 API endpoints under /api/monitoring-governance/* - 952 Sentinel rules across 9 categories (142 performance, 118 fairness, 87 drift, 156 ops, 134 security, 108 regulatory, 47 AGI safety) - 6 drift detectors (PSI, KS, Page-Hinkley, ADWIN, Wasserstein, label drift) - Alert management with 5-level escalation chain - SLA monitoring for 5 production services - 1.4M daily policy evaluations, 1,228 monitored signals - Dashboard: monitoring-governance.html ## Data Infrastructure & Quality Governance (DIGOV-GSIFI-WP-021) - 19 API endpoints under /api/data-governance/* - 6-dimension data quality framework (58 gates, 30 OPA rules) - Feature store (4,284 features, 7 groups, Feast + Redis + Delta Lake) - Data catalog (12,847 assets, 5 sensitivity levels, DataHub + OPA) - Consent management (42M records, 4 consent types, GDPR erasure SLA) - PII governance (4,847 fields, 5 protection methods, 91.4% compliance) - Dashboard: data-governance.html ## Global Compute Governance (GCGOV-GSIFI-WP-022) - 17 API endpoints under /api/global-compute-governance/* - ICGC (8 components, 38 member states) - Compute registry (847 registrations, 4 categories) - Cross-border data flows (8 jurisdictions, 847 active transfers) - Frontier model governance (thresholds, requirements, internal inventory) - Jurisdictional compliance (91.2% overall across 5 jurisdictions) ## Additional Artifacts - OPA policies: development_deployment_governance.rego (102 rules), monitoring_sentinel_engine.rego (952 rule framework), oecd_ai_principles.rego (18 rules) - Data: sentinel-rules-catalog.csv (30 rules), data-quality-gates.csv (20 gates), cicd-governance-gates.json (7 stages), model-inventory.csv (8 models) - Dashboards: financial-services-ai.html, regulator-exam.html - PMR fixes: added /kpis and /risk-register endpoints ## Platform Totals - 714 REST endpoints (was 632) - 40 dashboards (was 36) - 40 machine-readable artifacts (13 policies, 8 schemas, 15 data, 4 templates) - 14,189 lines of server code - Regression: 299/299 endpoints passed across 18 test categories
|
The files' contents are under analysis for test generation. |
|
Review these changes at https://app.gitnotebooks.com/OneFineStarstuff/OneFineStarstuff.github.io/pull/51 |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Reviewer's GuideAdds four deep governance backend modules (development/deployment, monitoring/observability, data infrastructure/quality, and global compute governance), a financial-services AI governance module, a regulator examination portal, Terraform/Kafka governance visualizations, and associated OPA policies and CSV/JSON artifacts, plus two new PMR endpoints, completing the 6-layer AI governance architecture and expanding REST and dashboard surface area. Sequence diagram for regulator evidence verification via examination portalsequenceDiagram
actor Regulator
participant Browser as Regulator_Exam_Portal_UI
participant RegExamAPI as Regulator_Exam_API
participant GovIndexAPI as Governance_Index_API
participant EvidenceStore as WORM_S3_Evidence_Store
Regulator->>Browser: Click "Run Verification" for bundle EVB_2026_Q1_00147
Browser->>GovIndexAPI: POST /api/governance-index/evidence-verify
GovIndexAPI->>EvidenceStore: Fetch evidence bundle and metadata
EvidenceStore-->>GovIndexAPI: Evidence files, hashes, signatures
GovIndexAPI->>GovIndexAPI: Verify SHA256, Ed25519, Merkle root, retention
GovIndexAPI-->>Browser: Verification result (status, merkleRoot, counts)
Browser-->>Regulator: Render verification result panel
Class diagram for new governance module structuresclassDiagram
class DEV_DEPLOY_GOV {
+metadata
+modelRegistry
+cicdPipeline
+deploymentStrategies
+approvalWorkflows
+killSwitch
+metrics
}
class DevDeploy_Metadata {
+title
+docRef
+version
+date
+classification
+scope
}
class ModelRegistry {
+platform
+totalRegistered
+production
+staging
+development
+archived
+registrationPolicy
+versionControl
+models
}
class CICDPipeline {
+name
+platform
+totalGates
+passRate
+avgPipelineTime
+dailyRuns
+stages
}
class DeploymentStrategies {
+active
+supported
+governanceRequirements
}
class ApprovalWorkflows {
+tiers
+auditTrail
}
class KillSwitch {
+types
+testingCadence
+lastTest
+testResult
}
class DevDeploy_Metrics {
+totalDeployments30d
+successRate
+meanLeadTime
+meanTimeToRecovery
+changeFailureRate
+doraLevel
+pipelineUptime
+opaRulesTotal
+evidenceBundlesGenerated30d
}
DEV_DEPLOY_GOV --> DevDeploy_Metadata : metadata
DEV_DEPLOY_GOV --> ModelRegistry : modelRegistry
DEV_DEPLOY_GOV --> CICDPipeline : cicdPipeline
DEV_DEPLOY_GOV --> DeploymentStrategies : deploymentStrategies
DEV_DEPLOY_GOV --> ApprovalWorkflows : approvalWorkflows
DEV_DEPLOY_GOV --> KillSwitch : killSwitch
DEV_DEPLOY_GOV --> DevDeploy_Metrics : metrics
class MONITORING_GOV {
+metadata
+sentinelEngine
+alertManagement
+driftDetection
+slaMonitoring
+incidentResponse
+observabilityStack
}
class Monitoring_Metadata {
+title
+docRef
+version
+date
+classification
+scope
}
class SentinelEngine {
+version
+totalRules
+activeRules
+disabledRules
+draftRules
+evaluationsPerDay
+avgEvaluationLatency
+ruleCategories
+ruleExamples
}
class AlertManagement {
+platform
+totalAlertsLast30d
+acknowledgedWithinSla
+falsePositiveRate
+meanTimeToAcknowledge
+meanTimeToResolve
+severityDistribution
+escalationChain
}
class DriftDetection {
+framework
+detectors
+monitoredSignals
+recentDriftEvents
}
class SlaMonitoring {
+services
+overallSlaCompliance
}
class IncidentResponse {
+framework
+meanTimeToDetect
+meanTimeToRespond
+meanTimeToResolve
+targetMTTR
+incidents30d
+incidentCategories
+runbooks
+tabletopExercises
}
class ObservabilityStack {
+metrics
+logs
+traces
+dashboards
+alerting
}
MONITORING_GOV --> Monitoring_Metadata : metadata
MONITORING_GOV --> SentinelEngine : sentinelEngine
MONITORING_GOV --> AlertManagement : alertManagement
MONITORING_GOV --> DriftDetection : driftDetection
MONITORING_GOV --> SlaMonitoring : slaMonitoring
MONITORING_GOV --> IncidentResponse : incidentResponse
MONITORING_GOV --> ObservabilityStack : observabilityStack
class DATA_INFRA_GOV {
+metadata
+dataQualityGates
+dataLineage
+featureStore
+dataCatalog
+consentManagement
+piiGovernance
}
class DataInfra_Metadata {
+title
+docRef
+version
+date
+classification
+scope
}
class DataQualityGates {
+framework
+overallScore
+target
+dimensions
+totalGates
+totalOpaRules
+enforcementMode
}
class DataLineage {
+platform
+totalDatasets
+trackedPipelines
+lineageDepth
+features
+complianceMapping
}
class FeatureStore {
+platform
+totalFeatures
+productionFeatures
+featureGroups
+governance
}
class DataCatalog {
+platform
+totalAssets
+classifiedAssets
+classificationRate
+sensitivityLevels
+automaticClassification
+searchCapabilities
}
class ConsentManagement {
+platform
+totalConsentRecords
+activeConsents
+consentTypes
+erasureProcessing
+kafkaIntegration
}
class PiiGovernance {
+detectionEngine
+totalPiiFieldsTracked
+protectionMethods
+complianceScore
+auditCadence
}
DATA_INFRA_GOV --> DataInfra_Metadata : metadata
DATA_INFRA_GOV --> DataQualityGates : dataQualityGates
DATA_INFRA_GOV --> DataLineage : dataLineage
DATA_INFRA_GOV --> FeatureStore : featureStore
DATA_INFRA_GOV --> DataCatalog : dataCatalog
DATA_INFRA_GOV --> ConsentManagement : consentManagement
DATA_INFRA_GOV --> PiiGovernance : piiGovernance
class GLOBAL_COMPUTE_GOV {
+metadata
+icgc
+computeRegistry
+crossBorderDataFlows
+frontierModelGovernance
+jurisdictionalCompliance
}
class GlobalCompute_Metadata {
+title
+docRef
+version
+date
+classification
+scope
}
class ICGC {
+name
+established
+memberStates
+mandate
+components
}
class ComputeRegistry {
+totalRegistrations
+categories
+complianceRequirements
}
class CrossBorderDataFlows {
+framework
+activeTransfers
+jurisdictions
+dataResidencyRequirements
}
class FrontierModelGovernance {
+thresholds
+requirements
+internalModels
}
class JurisdictionalCompliance {
+overallScore
+byJurisdiction
}
GLOBAL_COMPUTE_GOV --> GlobalCompute_Metadata : metadata
GLOBAL_COMPUTE_GOV --> ICGC : icgc
GLOBAL_COMPUTE_GOV --> ComputeRegistry : computeRegistry
GLOBAL_COMPUTE_GOV --> CrossBorderDataFlows : crossBorderDataFlows
GLOBAL_COMPUTE_GOV --> FrontierModelGovernance : frontierModelGovernance
GLOBAL_COMPUTE_GOV --> JurisdictionalCompliance : jurisdictionalCompliance
class FINANCIAL_SERVICES_AI_GOV {
+metadata
+modelInventory
+creditScoringGovernance
+earlMaturity
+regulatoryExamPrep
}
class FinancialAI_Metadata {
+title
+docRef
+version
+date
+classification
+scope
}
class ModelInventoryFS {
+totalModels
+productionModels
+inDevelopment
+retired
+highRisk
+categories
+validationCadence
}
class CreditScoringGovernance {
+models
+fairLendingTests
+sr117Workflow
+adverseAction
}
class EarlMaturity {
+levels
+currentLevel
+targetLevel
+targetDate
+gapAnalysis
}
class RegulatoryExamPrep {
+sr117Readiness
+baselIIIReadiness
+fcraEcoaReadiness
+evidenceBundles
}
FINANCIAL_SERVICES_AI_GOV --> FinancialAI_Metadata : metadata
FINANCIAL_SERVICES_AI_GOV --> ModelInventoryFS : modelInventory
FINANCIAL_SERVICES_AI_GOV --> CreditScoringGovernance : creditScoringGovernance
FINANCIAL_SERVICES_AI_GOV --> EarlMaturity : earlMaturity
FINANCIAL_SERVICES_AI_GOV --> RegulatoryExamPrep : regulatoryExamPrep
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
View changes in DiffLens |
1 similar comment
|
View changes in DiffLens |
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've found 2 issues, and left some high level feedback:
- server.js is getting very large and difficult to navigate; consider extracting these new governance modules (constants + routes) into separate route files or modules and mounting them in server.js to improve maintainability.
- Many of the new APIs embed substantial static configuration (e.g., thresholds, SLA values, jurisdiction lists, dates) directly in code; centralizing these into configuration or data files would make future updates less error-prone and easier to manage.
- The new POST endpoints (e.g., /api/financial-services-ai/validate-model, /api/dev-deploy-governance/validate-deployment) accept arbitrary request bodies without any validation; adding basic input validation and error handling would make these interfaces more robust and predictable for consumers.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- server.js is getting very large and difficult to navigate; consider extracting these new governance modules (constants + routes) into separate route files or modules and mounting them in server.js to improve maintainability.
- Many of the new APIs embed substantial static configuration (e.g., thresholds, SLA values, jurisdiction lists, dates) directly in code; centralizing these into configuration or data files would make future updates less error-prone and easier to manage.
- The new POST endpoints (e.g., /api/financial-services-ai/validate-model, /api/dev-deploy-governance/validate-deployment) accept arbitrary request bodies without any validation; adding basic input validation and error handling would make these interfaces more robust and predictable for consumers.
## Individual Comments
### Comment 1
<location path="rag-agentic-dashboard/public/financial-services-ai.html" line_range="55-56" />
<code_context>
+<div class="kpi"><span class="kpi-label">Production</span><span class="kpi-value">${inv.productionModels||'312'}</span></div>
+<div class="kpi"><span class="kpi-label">High Risk (Tier-1)</span><span class="kpi-value" style="color:#f44336">${inv.highRisk||'89'}</span></div>
+<div class="kpi"><span class="kpi-label">In Development</span><span class="kpi-value">${inv.inDevelopment||'184'}</span></div></div>
+<div class="card"><h3>Fair Lending Compliance</h3>
+${(fairLending.tests||fairLending||[]).slice(0,5).map(t=>`<div class="kpi"><span class="kpi-label">${t.test||t.name||'Test'}</span><span class="kpi-value"><span class="badge ${t.status==='PASS'?'badge-green':'badge-yellow'}">${t.status||'N/A'}</span></span></div>`).join('')}</div>
+<div class="card"><h3>Adverse Action Explainability</h3>
+<div class="kpi"><span class="kpi-label">Framework</span><span class="kpi-value">${(adverse.framework||adverse.method||'SHAP + ECOA')}</span></div>
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**issue (bug_risk):** Calling `.slice` on `fairLending` will throw when `fairLending.tests` is undefined because `fairLending` is an object, not an array.
Because the `/api/financial-services-ai/credit-scoring/fair-lending` endpoint returns an object (`disparateImpact`, `disparateTreatment`, etc.), when `fairLending.tests` is falsy the expression `(fairLending.tests || fairLending || [])` evaluates to that object, and calling `.slice` on it will throw at runtime. Normalize to an array first, e.g.:
```js
const tests = Array.isArray(fairLending.tests)
? fairLending.tests
: Object.values(fairLending);
tests.slice(0, 5).map(...)
```
</issue_to_address>
### Comment 2
<location path="artifacts/policies/development_deployment_governance.rego" line_range="86-88" />
<code_context>
+ input.model.metrics.shap_coverage < 0.95
+}
+
+deny_model_without_reproducibility {
+ not input.model.training.seed_documented
+ not input.model.training.environment_hash
+}
+
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**suggestion (bug_risk):** Reproducibility rule only denies when both seed and environment hash are missing, which may be weaker than intended.
Currently this rule only denies when both `training.seed_documented` and `training.environment_hash` are missing. If you want to deny when either is missing, use two separate rules (one for each field) or a single rule with an `or`, so a model missing one of these doesn’t incorrectly pass.
```suggestion
deny_model_without_explainability {
input.model.metrics.shap_coverage < 0.95
}
deny_model_without_reproducibility {
not input.model.training.seed_documented
}
deny_model_without_reproducibility {
not input.model.training.environment_hash
}
```
</issue_to_address>Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Comment on lines
+55
to
+56
| <div class="card"><h3>Fair Lending Compliance</h3> | ||
| ${(fairLending.tests||fairLending||[]).slice(0,5).map(t=>`<div class="kpi"><span class="kpi-label">${t.test||t.name||'Test'}</span><span class="kpi-value"><span class="badge ${t.status==='PASS'?'badge-green':'badge-yellow'}">${t.status||'N/A'}</span></span></div>`).join('')}</div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (bug_risk): Calling .slice on fairLending will throw when fairLending.tests is undefined because fairLending is an object, not an array.
Because the /api/financial-services-ai/credit-scoring/fair-lending endpoint returns an object (disparateImpact, disparateTreatment, etc.), when fairLending.tests is falsy the expression (fairLending.tests || fairLending || []) evaluates to that object, and calling .slice on it will throw at runtime. Normalize to an array first, e.g.:
const tests = Array.isArray(fairLending.tests)
? fairLending.tests
: Object.values(fairLending);
tests.slice(0, 5).map(...)
Comment on lines
+86
to
+88
| deny_model_without_explainability { | ||
| input.model.metrics.shap_coverage < 0.95 | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (bug_risk): Reproducibility rule only denies when both seed and environment hash are missing, which may be weaker than intended.
Currently this rule only denies when both training.seed_documented and training.environment_hash are missing. If you want to deny when either is missing, use two separate rules (one for each field) or a single rule with an or, so a model missing one of these doesn’t incorrectly pass.
Suggested change
| deny_model_without_explainability { | |
| input.model.metrics.shap_coverage < 0.95 | |
| } | |
| deny_model_without_explainability { | |
| input.model.metrics.shap_coverage < 0.95 | |
| } | |
| deny_model_without_reproducibility { | |
| not input.model.training.seed_documented | |
| } | |
| deny_model_without_reproducibility { | |
| not input.model.training.environment_hash | |
| } |
Up to standards ✅🟢 Issues
|
❌ Deploy Preview for onefinestarstuff failed.
|
…r Reference 2026-2030 DOCUMENT: MREF-GSIFI-WP-023 v1.0.0 — Institutional-Grade AGI/ASI Governance Master Reference for Fortune 500, Global 2000 & G-SIFIs (2026-2030) This commit delivers the comprehensive, institutional-grade governance master reference that consolidates 22 prior governance documents (WP-001 through WP-022) into a single authoritative reference covering 8 governance domains. ## New API Module: Master Reference (81 endpoints) ### Domain 1: Regulatory Compliance Architecture (8 frameworks) - EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF 1.0, ISO/IEC 42001, OECD AI Principles - GDPR, FCRA/ECOA, Basel III (CRE 30-36), SR 11-7 - Cross-framework compliance matrix with 847 overlaps, 312 unique requirements - Gap analysis: 176 gaps (12 critical, 28 high, 47 medium, 89 low) - 482 OPA Rego rules across 8 frameworks - 1,247 Sentinel rules ### Domain 2: Multilayered Governance Structure (8 pillars) - Accountability & Roles, Policy Infrastructure, Risk Management - AI-Ready Data, Dev/Deploy Governance, Monitoring & Observability - Compliance-as-Code & Auditability, Frontier AGI Safety & Global Coordination - 4-level decision hierarchy (Board → C-Suite → Operating Committee → Platform) - AGI incident escalation: 6 phases, 5 severity levels - Full RACI matrix for all governance activities ### Domain 3: Technical Implementation - 6-layer enterprise reference architecture (Sentinel v3.0) - Trust/compliance stack: identity, data protection, policy, audit, explainability, fairness - Kafka ACL governance: 12 topics, 45K events/s, 312 ACL rules, 10yr WORM - Terraform IaC: 8 modules, 144 resources, 7 CI/CD gates - 3 auditor workflow modes, 5 export formats, verification CLI ### Domain 4: Financial Services Specialisation - 847 model inventory (312 production, 89 Tier-1 high-risk) - 9 model categories: credit scoring, trading, fraud, AML, IRB risk, etc. - SR 11-7 validation stages, fair lending controls (DI threshold 0.80) - Trading algorithm governance, risk assessment (Basel III CRE 30-36) - EARL maturity model (current: Level 3, target: Level 4 by Q4 2027) ### Domain 5: Frontier AGI Safety - 8 trust-by-design principles - AAVP alignment verification protocol: 2,847 tests, 9 categories - 5-layer containment architecture (network, resource, behavioural, kill-switch, human) - 7 AGI Readiness Levels (ARL-1 through ARL-7) - Current: ARL-2, Target 2027: ARL-4, Target 2030: ARL-7 ### Domain 6: Global Governance Mechanisms - ICGC: 15 components across 38 member states - Global Compute Registry: 847 registrations in 4 categories - Cross-border coordination: 4 mechanisms, 8 jurisdictions - AI Treaty Initiative, Early Warning System, AI-SOC ### Domain 7: Master Blueprint (Enterprise + Frontier + Civilizational) - 3-scale integration: Enterprise → Frontier → Civilizational - Scalability pathway: departmental to global - Integration with 5 existing frameworks (COBIT, ITIL, IIA, COSO, SOC2) ### Domain 8: Implementation & Investment - 5-phase timeline: Foundation → Operationalisation → Advancement → Maturity → Optimisation - Cost-benefit: $68.4M investment, $118.7M NPV, 42.1% IRR, 2.1yr payback - Annual savings: $52.3M across 6 categories - Risk assessment: 48 risks (4 critical, 12 high) - 30/60/90-day rollout plan ## New Artifacts - regulatory-compliance-matrix.json (8-framework mapping with gaps) - governance-hierarchy.json (RACI + decision hierarchy + escalation) - agi-containment-protocol.json (5-layer containment + alignment verification) - cross-border-governance.csv (8 jurisdictions comparison) - master_reference_compliance.rego (268 lines, 10 sections, 8 frameworks) ## Updated Deliverables - master-reference.html (28KB, 10-section dashboard with full API integration) - server.js (15,161 lines, 791 total endpoints) ## Regression Test Results - 370/380 GET endpoints passed (10 parameterized :id routes correctly return 404 without params) - Master Reference module: 81/81 endpoints passed - Health check: OK ## Platform Totals - 791 REST endpoints (up from 714) - 15,161 lines of server code (up from 14,189) - 40 dashboard HTML files - 45 machine-readable artifacts (15 policies, 8 schemas, 18 data files, 4 templates) - 482+ OPA Rego rules - 1,247 Sentinel rules - 8 regulatory frameworks, 8 governance pillars - 12 Kafka topics, 8 Terraform modules, 144 resources
genspark-ai-developer
Bot
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
MREF-GSIFI-WP-023 — Institutional-Grade AGI/ASI Governance Master Reference 2026-2030
Overview
Master reference for Fortune 500, Global 2000 and 30 G-SIFIs covering 8 regulatory frameworks, 8 governance pillars, and institutional-grade AGI/ASI governance for 2026-2030.
What's New in This Update
Enhanced Master Reference Dashboard (
master-reference.html)14 New API Endpoints
/api/master-ref/regulatory/policy-as-code/api/master-ref/governance-structure/raci-matrix/api/master-ref/technical/kafka-acl/acl-rules/api/master-ref/technical/worm-storage/api/master-ref/technical/drift-detection/api/master-ref/technical/evidence-bundles/api/master-ref/financial-services/risk-management/api/master-ref/financial-services/customer-service/api/master-ref/agi-safety/kill-switch/status/api/master-ref/agi-safety/cognitive-resonance/api/master-ref/global-governance/jurisdiction-compliance/api/master-ref/blueprint/unified-view/api/master-ref/implementation/risks/register/api/master-ref/implementation/kpi-targetsPlatform Totals
Investment & ROI
Test Results
Files Changed
rag-agentic-dashboard/public/master-reference.html— Enhanced dashboard (600+ lines)rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js— 14 new endpoints (15,257 lines, 805 total endpoints)