feat(GSIFI-AIMS-BLUEPRINT-WP-037) v1.0.0 — Regulator-Grade AI Governance & ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS Master Blueprint for G-SIFIs (2026-2030)#73
Merged
Conversation
…nce & ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS Master Blueprint for G-SIFIs (2026-2030) - 12 modules / 44 sections / 8 schemas / 11 code examples / 5 case studies / 78 API routes - AIMS documentation Sections 1-5 (ISO/IEC 42001 Cl. 4-10) + Annexes J1-J4 - Multi-jurisdiction overlays: ECB SSM, Fed SR 11-7, PRA SS1/23, EU AI Act, GDPR - Regulator Submission Packs RSP v1.0 -> v2.6 with decision-traceability API, in-toto/Cosign/Rekor signing, PQC-ready (Dilithium hybrid), ZK predicates - Terraform + OPA technical enforcement: 5 modules, 7 policy bundles, 5 decision points (TF plan, CI gate, admission ctrl, runtime, egress) - Adversarial governance loop + 4 self-healing playbooks (SH-01..04) - Predictive governance (Prophet/ARIMA forecasters) + formally-verified obligation graph (TLA+/Lean for FCRA §615, GDPR Art. 22, EU AI Act Art. 73, ECB ICAAP) + counterfactual/causal supervisor queries - Cross-regulator FedReg federation (mTLS + SPIFFE) + Autonomous Supervisory Tiers T0..T5 + joint ECB+Fed+PRA examination workflow - High-risk credit underwriting reference pattern (AI-CR-UNDERWRITE-01, EU AI Act Annex III §5(b)) - 5-phase 2026-2030 roadmap (Foundation -> Industrialise -> Federate -> Verify -> Autonomous), 16 board-tracked KPIs, 3LoD + RACI + 5 committees - Reporting templates with <title>/<abstract>/<content> tags - Schemas: AI System Inventory, RSP Manifest, Decision Envelope, Control Mapping, FRIA, Incident Record, FedReg Message, Obligation Spec - 11 code examples: OPA RSP gate, Terraform WORM evidence (10y), decision envelope dual-signer (Ed25519+Dilithium3), fairness monitor + SH-01, FedReg client, drift forecaster, TLA+ Art.73 spec, Lean FCRA spec, self-healing engine, FastAPI traceability API, Merkle anchor - Generators: gen-gsifi-aims-blueprint.py (63 KB JSON) + gen-gsifi-aims-blueprint-html.py (76 KB HTML) - Server.js: /api/gsifi-aims/* endpoint family wired with /:id route ordering (specific paths declared before parametric to avoid shadowing) - Validated: node -c OK; PM2 online; HTTP 200 across modules M1-M12, endpoint groups (overlays, RSP versions, AIMS sections/annexes, roadmap phases/KPIs, RACI, schemas/code/cases); 8 lookup tests passed; 7 404 handling cases verified; HTML dashboard 78,241 bytes
|
Review changes with Changed Files
|
|
The files' contents are under analysis for test generation. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
Review these changes at https://app.gitnotebooks.com/OneFineStarstuff/OneFineStarstuff.github.io/pull/73 |
❌ Deploy Preview for onefinestarstuff failed.
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry @OneFineStarstuff, your pull request is larger than the review limit of 150000 diff characters
|
View changes in DiffLens |
Contributor
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR introduces a comprehensive ISO/IEC 42001-aligned AI governance blueprint for G-SIFIs. It comprises a JSON master blueprint (1,612 lines) defining governance structure across 12 modules, a Python generator script (1,716 lines) that constructs the blueprint, an HTML renderer (406 lines) that transforms it into a styled page, a public HTML artifact (774 lines), and new Express routes (230 lines) for serving blueprint content via API. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~50 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ast-grep (0.42.1)rag-agentic-dashboard/server.jsThanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 60 minutes.Comment |
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
View changes in DiffLens |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 882be58e1f
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
View changes in DiffLens |
Not up to standards ⛔🟢 Issues
|
| Metric | Results |
|---|---|
| Complexity | 76 |
| Duplication | 13 |
NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-gsifi-aims-blueprint.py (1)
1679-1702: ⚡ Quick winAdd a read-only check mode to prevent generator/output drift.
Right now the script always rewrites the artifact. Add a
--checkmode for CI that compares generated content against the committed file and exits non-zero on mismatch.💡 Suggested patch
+import argparse +import sys import json from pathlib import Path @@ -def main(): +def main(check: bool = False): data = { @@ - OUT.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) - OUT.write_text(json.dumps(data, indent=2), encoding="utf-8") + rendered = json.dumps(data, indent=2) + if check: + current = OUT.read_text(encoding="utf-8") if OUT.exists() else "" + if current != rendered: + print(f"Drift detected: {OUT} is out of date. Re-run generator.") + sys.exit(1) + print(f"OK: {OUT} is up to date.") + return + + OUT.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) + OUT.write_text(rendered, encoding="utf-8") @@ if __name__ == "__main__": - main() + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + parser.add_argument("--check", action="store_true", help="Validate generated file is up to date") + args = parser.parse_args() + main(check=args.check)🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-gsifi-aims-blueprint.py` around lines 1679 - 1702, Add a read-only "check" mode to main: parse a --check (or CHECK env) flag, generate the JSON string as now (using main()'s data construction and json.dumps) but if check is enabled do not call OUT.write_text; instead read the existing OUT content, compare bytes/normalized JSON (e.g., same indentation/newlines), and if they differ print a diff or message and exit with non-zero status; if identical exit 0. Keep the existing behavior when --check is false (create parent dirs, write file, compute size_kb). Reference the main() function and the OUT variable for where to insert the flag parsing and conditional write/compare logic.rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js (1)
21768-21970: Add cache validators for these static blueprint endpointsMost responses are static in-memory JSON. Consider
ETag/Cache-Control(and optionallyLast-Modified) to reduce payload transfer and improve client latency for repeated regulator-dashboard reads.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js` around lines 21768 - 21970, These endpoints under the '/api/gsifi-aims' surface (handlers using GSAIMS, GSAIMS_MODULES and gsaimsSection) return static in-memory JSON and should include cache validators: add a small middleware (e.g. addStaticCacheHeaders) applied to these routes that sets a Cache-Control header (public, max-age with a sensible TTL) and computes an ETag from the JSON payload (hash the JSON string) and sets Last-Modified if you have a stable timestamp; when the incoming If-None-Match or If-Modified-Since matches, respond 304 without body. Apply this middleware to the group of routes (or to app.get('/api/gsifi-aims/*', ...)) so all schema/code-example/case-study/module/section endpoints use the validators.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-gsifi-aims-blueprint-html.py`:
- Around line 96-97: The rendered module headers and TOC labels duplicate the
module id because titles sometimes start with the same id
(html.append(f"<h2>{esc(mid)} · {esc(title)}</h2>")) and TOC entries are
hard-clipped mid-word; update the rendering so you strip a leading id from title
before joining (e.g., if title.startswith(mid) remove the redundant prefix and
any punctuation/whitespace) and replace the simple substring clipping used for
TOC (lines around 132-134) with a word-aware truncator that cuts at the last
whitespace before the max length and appends an ellipsis; adjust the code paths
that build the header (variables mid and title where html.append is called) and
the TOC label construction to use the cleaned title and the new smart_truncate
helper.
- Around line 203-222: The code computing n_overlays, n_rsp_versions, n_phases
and n_kpis assumes sections has at least the indexed entries and can raise
IndexError; modify each computation to safely access sections (e.g., retrieve
sections = data.get("M3_regulatoryOverlays", {}).get("sections", []) and then
check len(sections) > 0 before accessing sections[0], similarly for M4_rsp and
M10_roadmap using appropriate index checks or using sections[index] if present
else fallback to {}), so that n_overlays = len(sections[0].get("overlays", []))
only runs when that section exists and otherwise defaults to 0 (apply same
guarded pattern for n_rsp_versions, n_phases, and n_kpis).
- Line 13: The generated confidential HTML (OUT variable in
gen-gsifi-aims-blueprint-html.py referencing gsifi-aims-blueprint.html) is being
served publicly via express.static in server.js
(app.use(express.static(path.join(__dirname, 'public')))), so either move the
artifact out of the public/static directory and write an authenticated endpoint
(e.g., /api/gsifi-aims/blueprint) that reads the file and enforces middleware
auth, or keep it public-by-design but add a documented justification in the repo
security/README; update the HTML generator/template (the code that embeds the
classification header at lines noted) to write to the secure location or to omit
classification when writing to public if you choose to keep public access.
In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-gsifi-aims-blueprint.py`:
- Around line 48-51: The blueprint currently sets the "classification" field to
a confidential label but is exposed via public APIs; either change the
"classification" value to a non-confidential label (e.g., "PUBLIC") in the
blueprint declaration or remove/lock public exposure by updating the API surface
that serves this artifact so it is internal-only; locate the "classification"
key in the gen-gsifi-aims-blueprint declaration and either replace the
confidential string with the appropriate public classification or restrict the
endpoints/configuration that return this blueprint so it is not served through
public API routes, and update any related tests/docs to match the chosen change.
- Around line 105-117: The deliverableInventory dict in
gen-gsifi-aims-blueprint.py is missing the summary-compatible keys required by
the /api/gsifi-aims/summary endpoint (deliverables, sections, policies,
frameworks, standards), causing the API to fall back to hard-coded values;
update the deliverableInventory object (the dict named "deliverableInventory")
to include those keys with appropriate counts or align the server mapping to
read existing keys (e.g., map modules→deliverables or aimsSections→sections) so
the summary endpoint consumes blueprint-backed values rather than hard-coded
defaults.
In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js`:
- Around line 21781-21784: The summary currently falls back to hardcoded counts
(e.g., aimsSections, annexes, regulatoryOverlays, rspVersions) when inv.* is
missing, causing incorrect /api/gsifi-aims/summary output; update the logic in
the summary builder to stop using literal numbers and instead use a safe
fallback (preferably 0 or a configurable constant) or compute the value from
available inventory arrays, e.g., replace patterns like "inv.aimsSections || 5"
with "inv.aimsSections ?? DEFAULT_AIMS_SECTIONS" (where DEFAULT_AIMS_SECTIONS is
a module-level constant or config/env value) or derive counts from
inv.aimsSections.length when inv arrays exist; apply the same change for
annexes, regulatoryOverlays, rspVersions and any other occurrences in the
/api/gsifi-aims/summary code path.
- Around line 21763-21766: gsaimsSection currently returns an empty object for
missing sections which causes downstream route handlers to send 200 with {};
change gsaimsSection(modKey, sid) to throw a NotFound (or return null) when the
section is not found (e.g., if no match, throw new Error('GSAIMS section not
found: ' + sid) or return null) and update the routes that call gsaimsSection
(the endpoints that currently assume an object) to check for that null/exception
and respond with res.status(404). Ensure the unique symbol gsaimsSection is
updated and callers catch the error or check for null and return 404 with a
clear message.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-gsifi-aims-blueprint.py`:
- Around line 1679-1702: Add a read-only "check" mode to main: parse a --check
(or CHECK env) flag, generate the JSON string as now (using main()'s data
construction and json.dumps) but if check is enabled do not call OUT.write_text;
instead read the existing OUT content, compare bytes/normalized JSON (e.g., same
indentation/newlines), and if they differ print a diff or message and exit with
non-zero status; if identical exit 0. Keep the existing behavior when --check is
false (create parent dirs, write file, compute size_kb). Reference the main()
function and the OUT variable for where to insert the flag parsing and
conditional write/compare logic.
In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js`:
- Around line 21768-21970: These endpoints under the '/api/gsifi-aims' surface
(handlers using GSAIMS, GSAIMS_MODULES and gsaimsSection) return static
in-memory JSON and should include cache validators: add a small middleware (e.g.
addStaticCacheHeaders) applied to these routes that sets a Cache-Control header
(public, max-age with a sensible TTL) and computes an ETag from the JSON payload
(hash the JSON string) and sets Last-Modified if you have a stable timestamp;
when the incoming If-None-Match or If-Modified-Since matches, respond 304
without body. Apply this middleware to the group of routes (or to
app.get('/api/gsifi-aims/*', ...)) so all
schema/code-example/case-study/module/section endpoints use the validators.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 79c7da0d-d16e-486a-864d-14b578202372
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
rag-agentic-dashboard/data/gsifi-aims-blueprint.jsonrag-agentic-dashboard/gen-gsifi-aims-blueprint-html.pyrag-agentic-dashboard/gen-gsifi-aims-blueprint.pyrag-agentic-dashboard/public/gsifi-aims-blueprint.htmlrag-agentic-dashboard/server.js
Contributor
|
Failed to generate code suggestions for PR |
This was referenced Jun 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Institutional-grade, regulator-ready master blueprint for ISO/IEC 42001-aligned AI governance and multi-jurisdiction regulatory compliance at G-SIFI scale, anchored on the high-risk credit underwriting use case (
AI-CR-UNDERWRITE-01, EU AI Act Annex III §5(b)).Deliverables (
rag-agentic-dashboard/)data/gsifi-aims-blueprint.json(63 KB) — 12 modules, 44 sections, 8 schemas, 11 code examples, 5 case studies, 78 API routesgen-gsifi-aims-blueprint.py(78 KB) — idempotent JSON generatorgen-gsifi-aims-blueprint-html.py(16 KB) — HTML dashboard rendererpublic/gsifi-aims-blueprint.html(76 KB) — interactive SPA dashboardserver.js—/api/gsifi-aims/*endpoint family wiredTwelve modules (M1–M12)
<title>/<abstract>/<content>Markdown skeleton, disclosure principlesSchemas (8)
aiSystemInventoryEntry,rspManifest,decisionEnvelope,controlMapping,friaRecord,incidentRecord,fedRegMessage,obligationSpec.Code examples (11)
opaRspGate(Rego),terraformWormEvidence(HCL, 10y Object Lock),decisionEnvelopeSigner(Ed25519 + Dilithium3 dual-sign),fairnessMonitor(AIR + SH-01 trigger),fedRegClient,predictiveDriftForecaster(Prophet),tlaPlusObligation(Art. 73 liveness),leanFcraSpec(FCRA §615 mech-checked),selfHealingPlaybookEngine,rspApiFastapi(decision traceability),merkleAnchor.Case studies (5)
Headline KPIs
Standards alignment
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (anchor), ISO/IEC 23894/5338/27001/27701, EU AI Act Art. 6/9/10/12/13/14/15/17/26/27/49/53/55/72/73 + Annex III §5(b), GDPR Art. 5/6/9/22/25/32/33/34/35, ECB SSM Guide + TRIM, SR 11-7 / OCC 2011-12, PRA SS1/23 + SS2/21, FCA Consumer Duty, Basel III/IV CRR3/CRD6, FCRA §604/§615, ECOA Reg B, CFPB Circular 2023-03, NIST AI RMF 1.0 + GenAI Profile, OECD AI Principles, G7 Hiroshima, Council of Europe AI Convention, OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS, SLSA L3, Sigstore/Cosign/in-toto.
Validation
node -c server.jsSYNTAX OK; PM2rag-dashonline/aims/sections,/aims/annexes,/regulatory/overlays,/rsp/versions,/enforcement/opa,/adversarial/playbooks,/predictive/forecasters,/federation/tiers,/credit-underwriting/decisioning,/roadmap/phases,/roadmap/kpis,/operating-model/raci,/reporting/audience,/schemas,/code-examples,/case-studies/gsifi-aims-blueprint.htmlHTTP 200, 78,241 bytesSummary by CodeRabbit