feat(AI-TRUST-ASI-BP-WP-046) v1.0.0 — Enterprise AI Trust, Security & ASI Containment Blueprint for G-SIFI / Fortune 500 (2026-2030)#81
Merged
Conversation
… ASI Containment Blueprint for G-SIFI / Fortune 500 (2026-2030) Comprehensive enterprise AI governance and security blueprint and reviews for G-SIFI / Fortune 500 financial institutions (2026-2030), unifying DevSecOps admission control + Sigstore/ML-DSA-44 CI/CD; AI governance sidecars + Kafka WORM + deterministic replay; zero-egress confidential K8s (Cilium + Kata + Gatekeeper); React trust dashboards + SOC log viewer; high-assurance RAG with RBAC + fiduciary checks + SEV-3 reporting; auto Annex IV / SR 11-7 regulator packs from CI/CD artifacts; SEV-0..SEV-3 IR + AlphaTrade-V9 board tabletops; 2LoD Judge-LLM adversarial; Global Compute Governance Consortium + Basel-like AI capital buffer; trading + credit-underwriting risk reviews with AI BoMs + crypto signatures; 3LoD + external-regulator inference replay (SHAP + governance flags); Go/Python/eBPF kernel interceptors for traffic + PII redaction + Kafka WORM streaming; SEV-0 BMC/IPMI kill-switch; guardrail/judge prompts (pre_flight_guardrail, red_team_judge, incident_triage_analyzer); 90-day rollout; NIST FIPS 204 PQC hardening of WORM + AI BoMs; federated learning + GDPR sovereignty; machine unlearning for Art 17; gradient-anomaly defense vs Sleeper Agent poisoning; ASI honeypot architectures; deceptive-alignment containment patterns for frontier / ASI-precursor systems. Counts: 14 modules · 70 sections · 12 schemas · 16 code examples · 6 case studies · 24 supervisory KPIs · 12 risk-control rows · 12 regulators · 7 workshops · 6 data flows · 14 traceability rows · 3-phase 90-day rollout · 100 API routes (28 distinct /api/ai-trust-asi-bp/* endpoints). Modules: M1 DevSecOps Admission Control + GitHub Actions (Sigstore + ML-DSA-44 + OPA + AI BoM) · M2 Sentinel sidecar + Kafka WORM + deterministic replay · M3 Zero-egress confidential K8s (Cilium + Kata + Gatekeeper + SEV-SNP/TDX) · M4 React trust dashboards + SOC log viewer (CSP + WebAuthn + RBAC + SHAP) · M5 High-assurance RAG (RBAC + fiduciary cosine + Judge-LLM + SEV-3 ticket) · M6 Auto Annex IV + SR 11-7 regulator pack (PAdES + Sigstore) · M7 SEV-0..SEV-3 IR + AlphaTrade-V9 tabletop · M8 2LoD Judge-LLM red-team (trading + credit + κ ≥ 0.9) · M9 Global Compute Governance Consortium + AI Capital Buffer · M10 High-risk reviews (credit + trading + signed AI BoM) · M11 3LoD + external-regulator replay (Kafka WORM + SHAP) · M12 Go/Python/eBPF kernel interceptors + BMC/IPMI kill-switch · M13 pre_flight_guardrail / red_team_judge / incident_triage_analyzer · M14 90-day rollout + FIPS 204 PQC + federated learning + Art 17 unlearning + Sleeper-Agent defense + ASI honeypot + deceptive alignment. Regulatory alignment: EU AI Act 2026 (Arts 5/9/10/13/14/15/16/26/50/53/55/56/72 + Annex IV), NIST AI RMF 1.0 + GAI Profile, ISO/IEC 42001/23894/5338/38507/27001/27701, GDPR Arts 5/6/17/22/25/32/35, EU DORA, Basel III/IV (BCBS 239 + Pillar 2 AI capital buffer), SR 11-7 + OCC 2011-12, PRA SS1/23 + SS2/21, FCA Consumer Duty + SYSC + SMCR, MAS FEAT + AI Verify + TRMG, HKMA SPM GS-1 / GL-90, OECD AI Principles, G7 Hiroshima, COE AI Convention, FSB AI, US EO 14110 + NIST GAI Profile, OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025), MITRE ATLAS, NIST FIPS 204 (ML-DSA) + FIPS 203 (ML-KEM), SLSA L3+ + Sigstore + in-toto, CIS K8s + NSA/CISA Hardening. Thresholds: piiLeakage ≤ 0.0001 · sev0KillSwitchSeconds ≤ 60 · sev1Hours ≤ 4 · sev2Hours ≤ 24 · sev3Days ≤ 3 · redTeamCoverageT1 ≥ 0.95 · judgeLLMAgreement (κ) ≥ 0.90 · fiduciaryCosineMin ≥ 0.92 · gradientAnomalyZ ≥ 3.5 · honeypotEngagementSeconds ≤ 10 · annexIVAssemblyMinutes ≤ 30 · multisig 3-of-5 · PQC ML-DSA-44 + ML-DSA-65 + Ed25519 hybrid · daily Merkle anchor. Deliverables (rag-agentic-dashboard/): data/ai-trust-asi-bp.json (68.1 KB), gen-ai-trust-asi-bp.py, gen-ai-trust-asi-bp-html.py, public/ai-trust-asi-bp.html (68.9 KB; HTTP 200, 70,529 bytes), server.js with 28 new /api/ai-trust-asi-bp/* routes. Validation: node -c server.js OK; PM2 rag-dash online; 44 HTTP 200 positive checks (root, /meta, /executive-summary, /summary, /counts, /regimes, /directive, /modules, /m1-m14, /modules/M1, /sections/M1-S1, /kpis, /kpis/KPI-01, /risk-control-matrix, /risk-control-matrix/RC-01, /regulators, /regulators/REG-01, /workshops, /workshops/WS-01, /data-flows, /data-flows/DF-01, /traceability, /privacy, /deployment, /rollout-90, /schemas, /schemas/decisionEnvelopeV2, /code-examples, /code-examples/CE-01, /case-studies, /case-studies/CS-01) and 11 HTTP 404 negative checks. Owner: CAIO + CISO + CRO; co-signed by GC, DPO, Head of Internal Audit, Head of Compliance, Head of MRM, Head of Platform Engineering, AI Safety Lead, Treaty Liaison, Head of SOC, Head of Trading Risk, Head of Credit Risk. Classification: CONFIDENTIAL — Board / CRO / CISO / CAIO / GC / DPO / Internal Audit / Head of MRM / AI Safety Lead / Prudential Supervisor / AI Safety Institute. Lineage: WP-035 → WP-036 → WP-037 → WP-038 → WP-039 → WP-040 → WP-041 → WP-042 → WP-043 → WP-044 → WP-045 → WP-046.
|
The files' contents are under analysis for test generation. |
|
Review changes with Changed Files
|
|
Review these changes at https://app.gitnotebooks.com/OneFineStarstuff/OneFineStarstuff.github.io/pull/81 |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry @OneFineStarstuff, you have reached your weekly rate limit of 500000 diff characters.
Please try again later or upgrade to continue using Sourcery
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
View changes in DiffLens |
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Contributor
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR introduces WP-046, a comprehensive Enterprise AI Trust, Security & ASI Containment Blueprint for 2026–2030. It comprises five interconnected components: a JSON data file defining 14 modules of governance controls, two Python generators (one creating the JSON, one rendering it to HTML), a public static HTML dashboard, and Express.js REST API routes exposing the blueprint for programmatic access. ChangesEnterprise AI Trust, Security & ASI Containment Blueprint (WP-046)
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~60 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ast-grep (0.42.1)rag-agentic-dashboard/server.jsTip 💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.
Built for teams:
One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
View changes in DiffLens |
Contributor
|
Failed to generate code suggestions for PR |
Not up to standards ⛔🔴 Issues
|
| Category | Results |
|---|---|
| Compatibility | 3 medium |
| UnusedCode | 1 medium |
| BestPractice | 49 minor |
| Documentation | 4 minor |
| ErrorProne | 1 medium 4 high |
| CodeStyle | 38 minor |
🟢 Metrics 15 complexity · 10 duplication
Metric Results Complexity 15 Duplication 10
NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.
|
View changes in DiffLens |
1 similar comment
|
View changes in DiffLens |
❌ Deploy Preview for onefinestarstuff failed.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-ai-trust-asi-bp-html.py (1)
35-36: 💤 Low valueConsider removing unused helper function.
The
render_listfunction is defined but never called. It appearsrender_value(lines 17-24) handles list rendering directly without delegating to this helper.♻️ Proposed cleanup
-def render_list(items): - return "<ul>" + "".join(f"<li>{render_value(i)}</li>" for i in (items or [])) + "</ul>" - -🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-ai-trust-asi-bp-html.py` around lines 35 - 36, The function render_list is an unused helper—remove or inline it to avoid dead code: delete the render_list definition since render_value already handles lists (see render_value) and ensure no other code references render_list; if you intended to use a helper, refactor render_value to call render_list instead and update references accordingly.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-ai-trust-asi-bp.py`:
- Around line 42-45: The artifact's "classification" field is set to
CONFIDENTIAL while the endpoint /api/ai-trust-asi-bp exposes it publicly; either
downgrade the classification to an appropriate publication level or restrict the
API route to authorized roles. Locate the "classification" key in
gen-ai-trust-asi-bp.py and either change its value to a non-confidential level
(e.g., INTERNAL or PUBLIC) if safe for exposure, or implement/enable access
control on /api/ai-trust-asi-bp (e.g., require authentication and enforce role
checks for Board/CRO/CISO/CAIO/GC/DPO/Internal Audit/Head of MRM/AI Safety
Lead/Prudential Supervisor/AI Safety Institute) so only permitted principals can
fetch this artifact.
- Line 997: The current OUT.write_text(json.dumps(DOC, indent=2)) may mis-encode
non-ASCII characters; update the write to emit UTF-8 and preserve characters by
using json.dumps with ensure_ascii=False and writing with an explicit UTF-8
encoding (i.e., call json.dumps(DOC, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False) and pass
encoding='utf-8' to OUT.write_text or write bytes encoded as UTF-8), referencing
the DOC variable and the OUT.write_text call to locate the change.
- Line 993: The hardcoded magic number "apiRoutes": 100 should be removed or
made dynamic: locate the dictionary/object emitting governance metadata (the
entry with the "apiRoutes" key) and either delete the "apiRoutes" field there or
replace it with a placeholder/value populated at runtime by the API layer (e.g.,
set to None or omit and have the API compute route_count), and ensure any code
that consumes this metadata gracefully handles a missing or null apiRoutes
value; update any callers that assume the integer to read the computed count
from the API instead.
In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/server.js`:
- Around line 23268-23272: Add input validation at the start of each Express
route that uses req.params.id (e.g., the handler registered by
app.get('/api/ai-trust-asi-bp/modules/:id') and the similar KPI, risk-control,
regulators, workshops, data-flows, schemas, code-examples, case-studies,
sections routes) by checking that req.params.id is a non-empty string after
trimming and does not contain suspicious characters (e.g., null bytes or path
separators like '/' or '\\'); if the check fails respond with
res.status(400).json({ error: 'invalid id' }) and return early before doing the
find() lookup so the subsequent find logic (e.g., AITRUSTASI.modules.find(...))
only runs for validated ids.
- Around line 23273-23279: Remove the fragile hardcoded shorthand routes by
deleting the for-loop that registers app.get(`/api/ai-trust-asi-bp/m${i}`, ...)
which iterates 1..14 and looks up modules via (AITRUSTASI.modules || []).find(x
=> x.id === `M${i}`); instead rely on the existing parameterized route
`/api/ai-trust-asi-bp/modules/:id` (or, if shorthands are required, replace the
fixed loop with a dynamic registration that iterates over AITRUSTASI.modules and
registers one app.get per module id). Ensure any references to the `/m${i}`
endpoints are updated or documented for backward compatibility.
- Around line 23251-23262: The AITRUSTASI endpoints (routes like
app.get('/api/ai-trust-asi-bp', ...), '/api/ai-trust-asi-bp/*' and the
AITRUSTASI object) are exposed with no auth; add an authentication/authorization
middleware (e.g., ensureAuthenticated or your existing authMiddleware) to all
/api/ai-trust-asi-bp routes (either by applying the middleware to each app.get
or by mounting a router and using router.use('/api/ai-trust-asi-bp',
authMiddleware) so every handler for AITRUSTASI is protected), and for the root
route that currently returns the full AITRUSTASI object restrict it to internal
users or replace it with a limited/filtered response (paginated or field-limited
summary) to prevent returning CONFIDENTIAL data; ensure any role checks or
classification checks run before accessing AITRUSTASI in handlers like the
executive-summary/counts/regimes/directive endpoints.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-ai-trust-asi-bp-html.py`:
- Around line 35-36: The function render_list is an unused helper—remove or
inline it to avoid dead code: delete the render_list definition since
render_value already handles lists (see render_value) and ensure no other code
references render_list; if you intended to use a helper, refactor render_value
to call render_list instead and update references accordingly.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 47e40369-fa73-4eb8-bfa8-8350f9c0b46b
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
rag-agentic-dashboard/data/ai-trust-asi-bp.jsonrag-agentic-dashboard/gen-ai-trust-asi-bp-html.pyrag-agentic-dashboard/gen-ai-trust-asi-bp.pyrag-agentic-dashboard/public/ai-trust-asi-bp.htmlrag-agentic-dashboard/server.js
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
WP-046 — Enterprise AI Trust, Security & ASI Containment Blueprint
Comprehensive enterprise AI governance and security blueprint and reviews for G-SIFI / Fortune 500 financial institutions (2026-2030), unifying DevSecOps admission control + Sigstore/ML-DSA-44 CI/CD; AI governance sidecars + Kafka WORM + deterministic replay; zero-egress confidential K8s (Cilium + Kata + Gatekeeper); React trust dashboards + SOC log viewer; high-assurance RAG with RBAC + fiduciary checks + SEV-3 reporting; auto Annex IV / SR 11-7 regulator packs from CI/CD artifacts; SEV-0..SEV-3 IR + AlphaTrade-V9 board tabletops; 2LoD Judge-LLM adversarial; Global Compute Governance Consortium + Basel-like AI capital buffer; trading + credit-underwriting risk reviews with AI BoMs + crypto signatures; 3LoD + external-regulator inference replay (SHAP + governance flags); Go/Python/eBPF kernel interceptors for traffic + PII redaction + Kafka WORM streaming; SEV-0 BMC/IPMI kill-switch; guardrail/judge prompts (
pre_flight_guardrail,red_team_judge,incident_triage_analyzer); 90-day rollout; NIST FIPS 204 PQC hardening of WORM + AI BoMs; federated learning + GDPR sovereignty; machine unlearning for Art 17; gradient-anomaly defense vs Sleeper Agent poisoning; ASI honeypot architectures; deceptive-alignment containment patterns for frontier / ASI-precursor systems.Counts
14 modules · 70 sections · 12 schemas · 16 code examples · 6 case studies · 24 supervisory KPIs · 12 risk-control rows · 12 regulators · 7 workshops · 6 data flows · 14 traceability rows · 3-phase 90-day rollout · 100 API routes (28 distinct
/api/ai-trust-asi-bp/*endpoints).Modules
pre_flight_guardrail/red_team_judge/incident_triage_analyzerRegulatory alignment
EU AI Act 2026 (Arts 5/9/10/13/14/15/16/26/50/53/55/56/72 + Annex IV), NIST AI RMF 1.0 + GAI Profile, ISO/IEC 42001/23894/5338/38507/27001/27701, GDPR Arts 5/6/17/22/25/32/35, EU DORA, Basel III/IV (BCBS 239 + Pillar 2 AI capital buffer), SR 11-7 + OCC 2011-12, PRA SS1/23 + SS2/21, FCA Consumer Duty + SYSC + SMCR, MAS FEAT + AI Verify + TRMG, HKMA SPM GS-1 / GL-90, OECD AI Principles, G7 Hiroshima, COE AI Convention, FSB AI, US EO 14110 + NIST GAI Profile, OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025), MITRE ATLAS, NIST FIPS 204 (ML-DSA) + FIPS 203 (ML-KEM), SLSA L3+ + Sigstore + in-toto, CIS K8s + NSA/CISA Hardening.
Thresholds
piiLeakage ≤ 0.0001 · sev0KillSwitchSeconds ≤ 60 · sev1Hours ≤ 4 · sev2Hours ≤ 24 · sev3Days ≤ 3 · redTeamCoverageT1 ≥ 0.95 · judgeLLMAgreement (κ) ≥ 0.90 · fiduciaryCosineMin ≥ 0.92 · gradientAnomalyZ ≥ 3.5 · honeypotEngagementSeconds ≤ 10 · annexIVAssemblyMinutes ≤ 30 · multisig 3-of-5 · PQC ML-DSA-44 + ML-DSA-65 + Ed25519 hybrid · daily Merkle anchor.
Deliverables
rag-agentic-dashboard/data/ai-trust-asi-bp.json(68.1 KB)rag-agentic-dashboard/gen-ai-trust-asi-bp.pyrag-agentic-dashboard/gen-ai-trust-asi-bp-html.pyrag-agentic-dashboard/public/ai-trust-asi-bp.html(68.9 KB; HTTP 200, 70,529 bytes)rag-agentic-dashboard/server.jswith 28 new/api/ai-trust-asi-bp/*routesValidation
node -c server.jsOK · PM2rag-dashonline · 44 HTTP 200 positive checks (root, /meta, /executive-summary, /summary, /counts, /regimes, /directive, /modules, /m1-m14, /modules/M1, /sections/M1-S1, /kpis, /kpis/KPI-01, /risk-control-matrix, /risk-control-matrix/RC-01, /regulators, /regulators/REG-01, /workshops, /workshops/WS-01, /data-flows, /data-flows/DF-01, /traceability, /privacy, /deployment, /rollout-90, /schemas, /schemas/decisionEnvelopeV2, /code-examples, /code-examples/CE-01, /case-studies, /case-studies/CS-01) and 11 HTTP 404 negative checks.Ownership / classification
Owner: CAIO + CISO + CRO; co-signed by GC, DPO, Head of Internal Audit, Head of Compliance, Head of MRM, Head of Platform Engineering, AI Safety Lead, Treaty Liaison, Head of SOC, Head of Trading Risk, Head of Credit Risk. Classification: CONFIDENTIAL — Board / CRO / CISO / CAIO / GC / DPO / Internal Audit / Head of MRM / AI Safety Lead / Prudential Supervisor / AI Safety Institute.
Lineage
WP-035 → WP-036 → WP-037 → WP-038 → WP-039 → WP-040 → WP-041 → WP-042 → WP-043 → WP-044 → WP-045 → WP-046.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation