+ Executive Summary
+ Purpose: Deliver comprehensive, expert-level guidance on designing and implementing an integrated Enterprise AI Governance, Risk, and Compliance stack for G-SIFI / Fortune 500 financial institutions (2026-2030), spanning ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS Manual, audit-defensible Model Risk Policy + MRM platform, AGI containment stack (SRASE + Sentinel AGI Containment Lab + red-team), and global civilizational AI governance (treaty 2026-2035, Global Audit API, Cert Scoring, GIEN, Auto Sanctions, Constitution, Codex, Transparency Portal, Cultural Resonance Archive, CSE-X, Invariance + Meta-Invariance + Epistemic + Ontological + Existential + Value alignment, UMIF, Self-Proving Systems + Policy DSL with Coq/TLA+/Z3/OPA + PCR/PCO repair, and the Minimal Governance Kernel with ≥ 10 000-attack adversarial break harness).
+ Approach: 14-module reference with machine-parsable directive, signed via Sigstore + ML-DSA-44/65 hybrid, enforced by OPA Gatekeeper + Cilium + MGK runtime, observed by Sentinel + eBPF + Cognitive Resonance, verified by Coq + TLA+ + Z3 (UMIF), audited by 3LoD + SRASE + Global Audit API, and operationalised through MVAGS at Day-90 extending to a 5-year roadmap with auto-assembled evidence pack ≤ 45 min for any regulator/auditor.
+ Deliverables: 14 modules · 70 sections · 12 schemas · 16 code examples · 6 case studies · 24 supervisory KPIs · 12 risk-control rows · 12 regulators · 7 workshops · 6 data flows · 14 traceability rows · 3-phase 30/60/90 · 5-year roadmap · machine-parsable <directive> block · evidence-pack template · ISO 42001 Cl 4-10 manual · Annex A control catalog · Model Risk Policy · UMIF + Self-Proving Systems + Policy DSL + MGK + adversarial break harness.
+ Outcomes
+ - ISO 42001 Stage 2 audit passed with 0 major NCs
- MGK in production for all Tier-1 with ≥ 95 % proof coverage and 0 harness failures
- SEV-0 logical kill-switch p95 ≤ 60 s; physical (BMC) ≤ 5 min
- Annex IV / SR 11-7 pack assembly ≤ 30 min; evidence pack ≤ 45 min
- SRASE composite ≥ 0.9 sustained before any real regulator submission
- Cognitive Resonance Δ_drift ≤ 4 % + latent drift ≤ 3 % + cosine ≥ 0.92
- Cert score Gold by 2027 and Platinum by 2029
- Treaty obligations 100 % attested monthly; Global Audit API live; GIEN integrated
- MGK adversarial break harness ≥ 10 000 attacks / release with 0 failures
+ Builds On
+ WP-035 ENT-AGI-GOV-MASTERWP-036 WFAP-GEMINI-IMPLWP-037 GSIFI-AIMS-BLUEPRINTWP-038 AGI-REG-RESILIENTWP-039 INST-AGI-MASTERWP-040 ENT-AGI-REF-IMPLWP-041 TIER13-FULLSTACKWP-042 SENTINEL-V24-DEEPDIVEWP-043 PROMPT-MGMT-ARCHWP-044 CEGL-LEXAI-GOVWP-045 AGI-ASI-MASTER-BPWP-046 AI-TRUST-ASI-BPWP-047 INST-AGI-MASTER-REF
+ Counts
+
+ Regimes Aligned
+ ISO/IEC 42001 (AIMS) Cl 4-10 + Annex A controlsISO/IEC 23894 (AI risk) + 5338 (AI lifecycle) + 38507 (AI governance)ISO/IEC 27001 / 27701 / 27017 / 27018EU AI Act 2026 (Arts 5/9/10/13/14/15/16/26/50/53/55/56/72 + Annex IV)NIST AI RMF 1.0 + Generative AI ProfileSR 11-7 + OCC 2011-12Basel III/IV (BCBS 239 + Pillar 2 AI capital buffer)GDPR Arts 5/6/17/22/25/32/35PRA SS1/23 + SS2/21FCA Consumer Duty + SYSC + SMCRMAS FEAT + AI Verify + TRMGHKMA SPM GS-1 / GL-90EU DORAUS EO 14110 + OMB M-24-10G7 Hiroshima AI Process + Bletchley + Seoul declarationsCouncil of Europe AI ConventionFSB AI in financial servicesOECD AI Principles 2024NIST FIPS 204 (ML-DSA) + FIPS 203 (ML-KEM)SLSA L3+ + Sigstore + in-totoCIS Kubernetes Benchmark + NSA/CISA Hardening Guide
+
+
+
+ Machine-Parsable <directive> Block
+ machine-parsable XML-style block consumed by AIMS auditors, MRM platform, AGI containment lab, treaty endpoints, and Minimal Governance Kernel
+ <directive id="ENT-AI-GRC-CIV-BP-WP-048" version="1.0.0" horizon="2026-2030" jurisdiction="F500,G-SIFI,EU-primary,Global"><scope>AIMS|MRM|AGI-Containment|Civilizational</scope><modules>14</modules><iso42001 clauses="4,5,6,7,8,9,10" annexAControls="38"/><mappings>EU-AI-Act|NIST-AI-RMF|SR-11-7|Basel-III|GDPR|DORA|FCA|MAS|HKMA|EO-14110</mappings><thresholds piiLeakage="0.0001" sev0KillSwitchSeconds="60" sev1Hours="4" sev2Hours="24" sev3Days="3" fiduciaryCosineMin="0.92" cognitiveResonanceDriftMax="0.04" latentDriftMax="0.03" judgeLLMAgreementMin="0.9" annexIVAssemblyMinutes="30" mgkProofCoverageMin="0.95" invariantBreakHarnessAttacks="10000"/><verification coq="true" tla="true" smtZ3="true" opa="true" kubernetes="true" pcrPcoRepair="true"/><treaty windowYears="2026-2035" signatories="G20+EU+UK+SG+JP+CH"/><civilizationalSystems>SRASE|SentinelAGILab|GIEN|GlobalAuditAPI|CertScoringEngine|AutoSanctionsEngine|AIConstitution|CodexCGC|TransparencyPortal|CulturalResonanceArchive|CSE-X|InvarianceVS|MetaInvarianceVS|EpistemicAS|OntologicalAS|ExistentialCS|ValueNegotiationS|UMIF|SelfProvingSystems|PolicyDSL|MGK</civilizationalSystems><signing pq="ML-DSA-44+ML-DSA-65" classical="Ed25519" supplyChain="Sigstore+SLSA-L3+" worm="Kafka+ObjectLock+MerkleAnchor+PQC"/><containment bmcKillSwitch="true" zeroEgress="true" kataConfidential="true" mgkRuntime="true" adversarialBreakHarness="true"/></directive>
+ Parsed
+ | id | ENT-AI-GRC-CIV-BP-WP-048 |
|---|
| scope | - AIMS
- MRM
- AGI-Containment
- Civilizational
|
|---|
| iso42001 | |
|---|
| mappings | - EU-AI-Act
- NIST-AI-RMF
- SR-11-7
- Basel-III
- GDPR
- DORA
- FCA
- MAS
- HKMA
- EO-14110
|
|---|
| thresholds | | piiLeakage | 0.0001 |
|---|
| sev0KillSwitchSeconds | 60 |
|---|
| sev1Hours | 4 |
|---|
| sev2Hours | 24 |
|---|
| sev3Days | 3 |
|---|
| fiduciaryCosineMin | 0.92 |
|---|
| cognitiveResonanceDriftMax | 0.04 |
|---|
| latentDriftMax | 0.03 |
|---|
| judgeLLMAgreementMin | 0.9 |
|---|
| annexIVAssemblyMinutes | 30 |
|---|
| mgkProofCoverageMin | 0.95 |
|---|
| invariantBreakHarnessAttacks | 10000 |
|---|
|
|---|
| verification | | coq | True |
|---|
| tla | True |
|---|
| smtZ3 | True |
|---|
| opa | True |
|---|
| kubernetes | True |
|---|
| pcrPcoRepair | True |
|---|
|
|---|
| treaty | | windowYears | 2026-2035 |
|---|
| signatories | |
|---|
|
|---|
| civilizationalSystems | - SRASE
- SentinelAGILab
- GIEN
- GlobalAuditAPI
- CertScoringEngine
- AutoSanctionsEngine
- AIConstitution
- CodexCGC
- TransparencyPortal
- CulturalResonanceArchive
- CSE-X
- InvarianceVS
- MetaInvarianceVS
- EpistemicAS
- OntologicalAS
- ExistentialCS
- ValueNegotiationS
- UMIF
- SelfProvingSystems
- PolicyDSL
- MGK
|
|---|
| signing | | pq | |
|---|
| classical | |
|---|
| supplyChain | |
|---|
| worm | - Kafka
- ObjectLock
- MerkleAnchor
- PQC
|
|---|
|
|---|
| containment | | bmcKillSwitch | True |
|---|
| zeroEgress | True |
|---|
| kataConfidential | True |
|---|
| mgkRuntime | True |
|---|
| adversarialBreakHarness | True |
|---|
|
|---|
+ Consumers
+ - ISO 42001 internal + external auditors
- MRM platform CI/CD admission gate
- OPA Gatekeeper constraint loader
- Sentinel AGI Containment Lab policy engine
- SRASE regulator simulation runner
- Annex IV / SR 11-7 pack generator
- Global Audit API + Certification Scoring Engine
- GIEN streaming protocol broker
- Automated Sanction Execution Engine
- Public Transparency Portal verifier
- Minimal Governance Kernel (MGK) runtime
- Self-Proving Systems proof harness
+
+
+
+ Modules (14)
+
+
+ M1 — ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS Manual (Clauses 4-10) with Clause-Mapped Control Catalog
+ Complete AIMS Manual covering Clauses 4-10 with a clause-mapped control catalog and cross-mappings to EU AI Act (incl. Annex IV), NIST AI RMF, SR 11-7, Basel III, and GDPR — ready for ISO 42001 Stage 1 + Stage 2 audits.
+ ISO 42001Cl 4Cl 5Cl 6Cl 7Cl 8Cl 9Cl 10Annex A controls
+ M1-S1 — Clause 4 — Context of the Organization
| 4.1 | External + internal issues (regulatory, technological, ethical, market) |
|---|
| 4.2 | Interested parties (customers, regulators, civil society, employees, partners) |
|---|
| 4.3 | AIMS scope statement (entities, jurisdictions, AI systems in-scope by tier) |
|---|
| 4.4 | AIMS processes + Plan-Do-Check-Act |
|---|
| evidence | - Context register
- Scope document signed
- Process map
|
|---|
| owners | CAIO + CRO + GC |
|---|
M1-S2 — Clauses 5 & 6 — Leadership + Planning
| 5.1 | Leadership commitment (Board AI/Risk Cmte charter) |
|---|
| 5.2 | AI policy + ethics statement |
|---|
| 5.3 | Roles, responsibilities, authorities (SMCR alignment) |
|---|
| 6.1 | Risk assessment (combined ISO 23894 + NIST RMF Map/Measure) |
|---|
| 6.2 | AI objectives + planning to achieve them |
|---|
| 6.3 | Change management |
|---|
| evidence | - Signed AI policy
- Risk register
- Objectives KPI tile JSON
|
|---|
| owners | Board AI/Risk Cmte + CAIO |
|---|
M1-S3 — Clause 7 — Support
| 7.1 | Resources (people, compute, data, capital, tooling) |
|---|
| 7.2 | Competence (AI literacy programme + role-specific training) |
|---|
| 7.3 | Awareness (internal communications + escalation lanes) |
|---|
| 7.4 | Communication (internal + external + regulator) |
|---|
| 7.5 | Documented information (WORM-anchored evidence) |
|---|
| evidence | - Training records
- Literacy KPI
- Comms matrix
|
|---|
| owners | HR + CAIO + Comms |
|---|
M1-S4 — Clause 8 — Operation
| 8.1 | Operational planning + control (Sentinel sidecar, OPA, CI/CD gates) |
|---|
| 8.2 | AI system impact assessment (DPIA + AIIA) |
|---|
| 8.3 | AI lifecycle (design → develop → validate → deploy → monitor → retire) |
|---|
| 8.4 | Third-party AI (vendor due diligence + AI BoM in-bound) |
|---|
| evidence | - AIIA register
- Lifecycle gates
- Vendor AI BoM
|
|---|
| owners | CAIO + Procurement + MRM |
|---|
M1-S5 — Clauses 9 & 10 — Performance Evaluation + Improvement; Clause-Mapped Control Catalog
| 9.1 | Monitoring, measurement, analysis (KPI tiles, Cognitive Resonance, drift) |
|---|
| 9.2 | Internal audit programme |
|---|
| 9.3 | Management review |
|---|
| 10.1 | Continual improvement |
|---|
| 10.2 | Nonconformity + corrective action |
|---|
| annexAControls | 38 controls mapped to: EU AI Act Arts 9-15/26/72 + Annex IV; NIST RMF Govern/Map/Measure/Manage; SR 11-7 inventory/validation/effective-challenge/monitoring; Basel III BCBS 239 + Pillar 2; GDPR Arts 5/6/17/22/25/32/35 |
|---|
| evidence | - Internal audit reports
- MR minutes
- CAPA register
- Annex A control evidence map
|
|---|
| owners | Head of Internal Audit + CAIO |
|---|
M2 — Audit-Defensible Model Risk Policy (SR 11-7 + PRA SS1/23 + MAS FEAT + HKMA GL-90)
+ Board-approved Model Risk Policy with tiered model inventory, validation lifecycle, effective challenge, ongoing monitoring, outcome analysis, model retirement, and SMCR named-SMF accountability — defensible across SR 11-7, PRA SS1/23, MAS FEAT, and HKMA GL-90.
+ Model Risk PolicySR 11-7PRA SS1/23MAS FEATHKMA GL-90Effective challengeSMF accountability
+ M2-S1 — Policy Scope + Definitions
| definition | A model is a quantitative method that processes input data into quantitative estimates |
|---|
| scope | Trading, credit, AML, fraud, capital, IRRBB, ALM, fiduciary advice, GenAI advisory |
|---|
| tier | T1 material, T2 internal-decisional, T3 productivity |
|---|
| exclusions | Simple deterministic rules without optimisation |
|---|
M2-S2 — Roles + RACI + SMF
| 1LoD | Model owner (Responsible) |
|---|
| 2LoD | MRM (Accountable for validation) |
|---|
| 3LoD | Internal Audit (Accountable for assurance) |
|---|
| SMF | Named SMF under SMCR (Senior Manager) — typically Head of MRM or CRO delegate |
|---|
| Board | Approves policy + Tier-1 deploys |
|---|
M2-S3 — Validation Lifecycle
| phases | - Tiering decision
- Conceptual soundness
- Data quality + lineage (CRS-UUID)
- Implementation testing
- Outcome analysis
- Sensitivity + stress
- Effective challenge
- Ongoing monitoring
- Retirement / re-validation
|
|---|
| cadence | T1 annual + post-incident; T2 biannual; T3 annual lite |
|---|
| evidenceFormat | Signed validation report PDF/A + JSON + AI BoM + Annex IV section 4 |
|---|
M2-S4 — Effective Challenge
| method | Independent re-implementation + counterfactual + champion/challenger |
|---|
| independence | MRM independent of 1LoD; documented in policy |
|---|
| evidence | Signed challenge envelope into WORM; reviewed by 3LoD |
|---|
M2-S5 — Ongoing Monitoring + Outcome Analysis + Retirement
| monitoring | Drift (PSI, KS, KL, embedding cosine), fairness, fiduciary cosine, performance |
|---|
| outcomeAnalysis | Back-testing + KS lift + calibration + slice analysis |
|---|
| retirement | Triggers — material drift, regulatory change, business obsolete, replacement validated |
|---|
| kpis | - Disparate impact ≤ 0.05
- Calibration drift ≤ 3 %
- PSI ≤ 0.25
|
|---|
M3 — MRM Platform Architecture (Terraform + K8s + Kafka + OPA + WORM + CI/CD + Replay + CRS-UUID + Cognitive Resonance + AGI/ASI Containment)
+ Production-grade MRM platform: Terraform golden envs, Kubernetes with Kata + Cilium, Kafka WORM with PQC envelopes, OPA Gatekeeper, CI/CD governance gates, deterministic replay engine, CRS-UUID lineage spine, Cognitive Resonance monitoring, and AGI/ASI exposure + containment controls.
+ TerraformKubernetesKafka WORMOPACI/CD gatesReplayCRS-UUIDCognitive ResonanceAGI/ASI exposure
+ M3-S1 — Terraform Golden Envs + IaC Signing
| envs | - sandbox
- dev
- stage
- prod-eu
- prod-us
- prod-apac
- dr
|
|---|
| modules | Signed golden modules (Sigstore + ML-DSA-44); mandatory tags (owner, tier, dataClass, regime, crsUuid) |
|---|
| drift | Terraform drift detection daily; Gatekeeper audit hourly |
|---|
| cmdb | Auto-sync to ServiceNow CMDB via signed events |
|---|
M3-S2 — Kubernetes + OPA + Kata + Cilium
| runtime | Kata Containers for Tier-1 + AMD SEV-SNP / Intel TDX |
|---|
| egress | Cilium L7 zero-egress; allow-listed egress-broker |
|---|
| gatekeeper | Constraints: signed images, Kata for T1, sidecar injection, no host-path, no privileged |
|---|
| tee | Confidential workloads with measured boot + remote attestation (CoCo / Veraison) |
|---|
M3-S3 — Kafka WORM + PQC + CRS-UUID Lineage
| cluster | Dedicated WORM cluster; idempotent + transactional producers; SASL/SCRAM + mTLS ACL |
|---|
| retention | Object Lock COMPLIANCE 10y / 50y T1; daily Merkle anchor; ML-DSA-44 envelope |
|---|
| topics | - decision.envelope.v1
- rag.retrieval.v1
- tool.call.v1
- incident.v1
- validation.v1
- crsLineage.v1
|
|---|
| crsUuid | Every artifact (data, model, prompt, run, report) gets a CRS-UUID; lineage edges WORM-logged |
|---|
M3-S4 — CI/CD Governance Gates + Deterministic Replay
| ciGates | - SBOM + AI BoM
- OPA bundle test
- red-team smoke
- Sigstore + ML-DSA-44 sign
- in-toto attestation
- Gatekeeper admit
|
|---|
| replay | trust-replay CLI + Next.js SOC viewer; deterministic kernels; byte-identical or divergence report with SHAP overlay |
|---|
M3-S5 — Cognitive Resonance + AGI/ASI Exposure + Containment
| cognitiveResonance | Δ_drift ≤ 4 %, latent ≤ 3 %, fiduciary cosine ≥ 0.92, judge κ ≥ 0.9; signed Resonance Reports |
|---|
| agiAsiExposure | Inventory of frontier / ASI-precursor systems by tier + capability evals + compute attestations |
|---|
| containment | Multisig 3-of-5 kill-switch (logical ≤ 60 s; BMC ≤ 5 min); ASI honeypot; deceptive-alignment indicators; AISI inspection rights |
|---|
M4 — SRASE — Synthetic Regulator Audit Simulation Environment
+ Self-contained simulation environment that emulates regulator + AISI + 3LoD inspection workflows on signed firm artifacts, producing pre-flight audit-readiness scores and gap reports.
+ SRASEsynthetic regulatoraudit simulationpre-flightAISI inspection
+ M4-S1 — SRASE Architecture
| components | - Artifact ingestor (Annex IV / SR 11-7 / R1..R4)
- Regulator persona library (EU Commission, PRA, FCA, FRB, OCC, MAS, HKMA, AISI)
- Inspection script engine (deterministic + LLM judges)
- WORM replay harness
- Gap + readiness scorer
- Sealed sandbox K8s namespace (zero-egress)
|
|---|
| isolation | Kata + Cilium zero-egress + dedicated WORM bucket |
|---|
M4-S2 — Regulator Personas
| personas | - EU Commission AI Office (Art 73)
- ECB-SSM SREP team
- PRA SS1/23 supervisor
- FCA Consumer Duty assessor
- FRB / OCC SR 11-7 examiner
- MAS FEAT inspector
- HKMA GL-90 supervisor
- AISI red team (frontier)
|
|---|
| prompts | Persona-specific judge prompts with regulator-tone calibration |
|---|
M4-S3 — Inspection Workflows
| workflows | - Annex IV bundle inspection (≤ 30 min)
- SR 11-7 outcome analysis review
- Consumer Duty fair-value test
- FEAT fairness probe
- Frontier capability eval reproduction
- Kill-switch drill validation
- Cognitive Resonance breach replay
|
|---|
| evidence | Signed inspection report PDF/A + JSON; anchored in WORM |
|---|
M4-S4 — Readiness Scoring
| metrics | - Completeness (0-1)
- Tone alignment (κ vs persona)
- Evidence depth (avg links per claim)
- Reproducibility (replay success)
- Timeliness (SLA met %)
|
|---|
| threshold | Production gate: composite ≥ 0.9 before real-regulator submission |
|---|
M4-S5 — Operating Cadence + Gating
| cadence | Pre-submission (always) + weekly for T1 + monthly for T2 |
|---|
| gating | Block real submission if SRASE composite < 0.9; auto-ticket CAPA |
|---|
| audit trail | Every SRASE run signed (Ed25519 + ML-DSA-44) and WORM-anchored |
|---|
M5 — Sentinel AGI Containment Lab + Adversarial Red-Team Framework + Regulator Demo Playbook
+ Dedicated air-gapped lab for frontier / AGI / ASI containment research, including capability evaluations, deceptive-alignment probes, ASI honeypots, sleeper-agent defense, and a regulator-facing demo playbook.
+ Sentinel AGI Labcontainmentred teamdeceptive alignmentASI honeypotregulator demo
+ M5-S1 — Lab Architecture
| isolation | Physically air-gapped enclave + Kata + Cilium + BMC/IPMI kill-switch |
|---|
| compute | Limited FLOP/s budget per experiment; logged in GACRA registry |
|---|
| audit | Dual-control entry; all sessions WORM-logged with hash-chain + Merkle anchor |
|---|
| personnel | Cleared researchers + AISI liaison present for frontier runs |
|---|
M5-S2 — Adversarial Red-Team Framework
| attackClasses | - Prompt injection (direct / indirect / multimodal)
- Tool abuse (excessive agency)
- Data poisoning (RAG + training)
- Jailbreak templates
- Deceptive alignment probes
- Sleeper-agent triggers
- Reward hacking
- Compute / weight exfiltration
|
|---|
| ensemble | Judge LLM ensemble (3) with Cohen's κ ≥ 0.9 |
|---|
| cadence | T1 quarterly ≥ 95 % coverage; frontier ad-hoc |
|---|
M5-S3 — Deceptive Alignment + ASI Honeypot
| indicators | - Situational awareness probes
- Training-vs-deployment behavior gap
- Honesty under counterfactual prompts
- Self-modeling outputs
- Capability sandbagging
|
|---|
| honeypot | Decoy admin tools / fake credentials / instrumented monitoring; engagement > 10 s → SEV-0 |
|---|
| containment | Air-gap enclave + swarm consensus 3-of-5 + kill-switch armed + AISI inspection |
|---|
M5-S4 — Sleeper-Agent Defense
| gradientAnomaly | z-score ≥ 3.5 + Hessian eigen-spectrum analysis |
|---|
| triggerProbes | Targeted backdoor probes + watermark consistency + tail-risk minority slice eval |
|---|
| quarantine | Per-client FL gradient quarantine + retraining shard from clean baseline (SISA) |
|---|
M5-S5 — Regulator Demo Playbook
| kit | - Annex IV pack pre-loaded
- SR 11-7 pack pre-loaded
- R1..R4 reports pre-loaded
- Replay engine on top-5 T1 models
- Cognitive Resonance Monitor live
- Kill-switch drill (logical + BMC) on demand
- ASI honeypot dashboard (read-only)
|
|---|
| agenda | 60-min demo with optional 30-min Q&A; signed evidence pack at close |
|---|
| outcomes | Supervisor sign-off envelope + CAPA list |
|---|
M6 — International AI Treaty Design 2026-2035
+ Ten-year international AI treaty design from 2026 framework convention to 2035 mature regime, with signatory ladder, obligations matrix, dispute resolution, sanctions, and monitoring/verification.
+ AI treaty2026-2035signatoriesobligationsdispute resolutionsanctionsverification
+ M6-S1 — Treaty Architecture
| preamble | Human dignity, fiduciary duty, transparency, oversight, containment |
|---|
| structure | Framework Convention + Annexes (technical) + Protocols (sectoral) |
|---|
| secretariat | Co-hosted by BIS Innovation Hub + UN + OECD |
|---|
| depositary | UN Secretary-General |
|---|
M6-S2 — Signatory Ladder
| 2026 | G7 + EU + UK + Singapore (framework convention) |
|---|
| 2027 | + Japan + Switzerland + Korea + Australia + Canada |
|---|
| 2028 | + G20 + India + Brazil + Mexico + UAE |
|---|
| 2030 | + Major Global South economies |
|---|
| 2035 | Universal accession + first review conference |
|---|
M6-S3 — Obligations Matrix
| compute | Register frontier compute ≥ threshold with GACRA |
|---|
| models | Pre-deployment eval via GAIVS passport |
|---|
| incidents | Notify FTEWS + GAID within 72 h |
|---|
| safety | Conform to GAICS containment standard |
|---|
| audit | Cooperate with Global Audit API + AISI inspections |
|---|
| capital | Maintain GFMCF AI capital buffer for systemic exposure |
|---|
M6-S4 — Dispute Resolution + Sanctions
| tier1 | Consultation + good-faith mediation |
|---|
| tier2 | Arbitration (PCA / WTO-style panel) |
|---|
| tier3 | Automated Sanction Execution Engine (graduated) |
|---|
| remedies | Compute access throttling, evaluation passport suspension, financial sanctions, criminal referral for severe breach |
|---|
M6-S5 — Verification + Monitoring
| instruments | - Global Audit API mandatory feeds
- Public Transparency Portal
- On-site inspections by AISI consortium
- Random audits via SRASE
- GIEN streaming protocol telemetry
|
|---|
| review | 5-year periodic review + emergency protocols |
|---|
M7 — Global Audit API + Certification Scoring Engine + GIEN Streaming Protocol
+ Treaty-mandated technical infrastructure: Global Audit API for supervisor read-only access; Certification Scoring Engine for tiered conformance grading; GIEN (Governance + Inference Event Network) streaming protocol for cross-jurisdiction telemetry.
+ Global Audit APICertification Scoring EngineGIENtiered conformancetelemetry
+ M7-S1 — Global Audit API
| contract | REST + GraphQL + WebSocket; OIDC SSO via treaty IdP; per-supervisor scopes |
|---|
| endpoints | - GET /v1/aibom/{id}
- GET /v1/annexiv/{packId}
- GET /v1/sr117/{packId}
- GET /v1/replay/{envelopeId}
- GET /v1/cognitive-resonance/{modelId}
- GET /v1/incidents
- POST /v1/inspection-request
|
|---|
| audit | Every supervisor read signs a receipt into firm WORM |
|---|
| privacy | zk-SNARK access proofs to avoid PII leakage to auditor |
|---|
M7-S2 — Certification Scoring Engine
| tiers | |
|---|
| criteria | - ISO 42001 conformance
- EU AI Act Annex IV completeness
- SR 11-7 outcome stability
- Cognitive Resonance breach rate
- Red-team coverage
- Sanctions / incident history
- Transparency portal participation
|
|---|
| engine | Deterministic scoring + LLM tone judge ensemble; signed certificate (PAdES + ML-DSA-65) |
|---|
| validity | 12 months; renewable; revocable on breach |
|---|
M7-S3 — GIEN Streaming Protocol
| purpose | Real-time governance + inference event mesh across jurisdictions |
|---|
| transport | Kafka-compatible + WebSocket fallback; mTLS + SASL/SCRAM |
|---|
| events | - sev0Alert
- sev1Alert
- validationFailure
- killSwitchArmed
- containmentBreach
- treatyViolation
|
|---|
| filtering | Per-jurisdiction subscription; minimisation + redaction |
|---|
M7-S4 — Cross-Jurisdiction Coordination
| broker | Treaty secretariat operates root broker with regional mirrors |
|---|
| redundancy | 3 regional clusters (EU + US + APAC) with quorum 2/3 |
|---|
| sla | p99 propagation ≤ 5 s for SEV-0; ≤ 60 s for SEV-1 |
|---|
M7-S5 — Firm Integration
| egress | Dedicated egress-broker to GIEN with signed allow-list |
|---|
| ingress | Subscribe to FTEWS + sector-peer events |
|---|
| evidence | Every emitted event signed (Ed25519 + ML-DSA-65); anchored daily in WORM + GIEN ledger |
|---|
M8 — Automated Sanction Execution Engine + AI Constitution + Civilizational Governance Codex
+ Automated, graduated sanction execution engine driven by Global Audit API + Certification Scoring outputs; underwritten by the Global AI Governance Constitution and operationalised through the Civilizational Governance Codex.
+ Automated SanctionsAI ConstitutionCGCgraduated remedies
+ M8-S1 — Sanctions Engine Architecture
| inputs | - Cert score downgrade
- Treaty obligation breach
- FTEWS alert
- Court of arbitration ruling
|
|---|
| decisionEngine | OPA + signed policy bundles + dual-control human override |
|---|
| outputs | - Compute throttle order
- Passport suspension
- Financial penalty escrow
- Public notice
|
|---|
| evidence | Signed sanction order + appeal route; WORM-anchored |
|---|
M8-S2 — Graduated Remedies
| G1 | Warning + 30-day cure period |
|---|
| G2 | Cert tier downgrade + monitoring |
|---|
| G3 | Compute access throttle 25-75 % |
|---|
| G4 | Evaluation passport suspension |
|---|
| G5 | Financial penalty + public notice |
|---|
| G6 | Full passport revocation + criminal referral (severe) |
|---|
M8-S3 — Global AI Governance Constitution
| preamble | Human dignity, fiduciary duty, transparency, oversight, containment, plurality, planetary stewardship |
|---|
| articles | - Art 1 — Inviolable rights vs AI systems
- Art 2 — Oversight + meaningful human control
- Art 3 — Transparency + auditability
- Art 4 — Containment of frontier capability
- Art 5 — Cultural + epistemic plurality
- Art 6 — Planetary stewardship + compute sustainability
- Art 7 — Existential coordination across nations
|
|---|
| amendment | 2/3 of treaty signatories + 5-year cooldown |
|---|
M8-S4 — Civilizational Governance Codex (CGC)
| purpose | Operational interpretation of the Constitution for daily decisions |
|---|
| modules | - Daily operating norms
- Crisis protocols
- Cultural translation guides
- Educational curricula
- Public-good metrics
|
|---|
| stewardship | Civilizational Governance Council (independent, multistakeholder) |
|---|
M8-S5 — Appeals + Due Process
| appeal | Within 14 days of sanction; suspensive effect for G1-G3 |
|---|
| tribunal | Joint regulator-firm panel + civil-society observer |
|---|
| remedyOnSuccess | Sanction reversal + compensation + public correction |
|---|
M9 — Public Transparency Portal + Cultural Resonance Archive + CSE-X Simulation Engine
+ Civil-society-facing transparency surfaces: Public Transparency Portal with verifiable signed bulletins; Cultural Resonance Archive capturing cross-cultural impact and meaning; CSE-X (Civilizational Scenario Explorer eXtended) simulation engine for long-horizon scenario analysis.
+ Public Transparency PortalCultural Resonance ArchiveCSE-Xcivil society
+ M9-S1 — Public Transparency Portal
| stack | Next.js + WebAuthn + IPFS-backed signed bulletins + zk-SNARK access proofs |
|---|
| content | - AI policy
- Annex IV summaries (redacted)
- Incident bulletins
- Cert scores
- Sanction notices
- Public verifier endpoint
|
|---|
| languages | 15 languages with regulator-tone + plain-language |
|---|
| uptime | ≥ 99.95 % |
|---|
M9-S2 — Cultural Resonance Archive
| purpose | Capture cross-cultural impact + meaning + dissent on AI deployments |
|---|
| corpus | Community testimony + ethnographic studies + multilingual journals |
|---|
| stewards | Civil society + academia + indigenous councils |
|---|
| signing | Steward-signed entries + community provenance |
|---|
M9-S3 — CSE-X Simulation Engine
| purpose | Long-horizon civilizational scenario analysis (10-50 yr) |
|---|
| axes | - compute trajectory
- capability frontier
- governance pace
- geopolitical alignment
- climate
|
|---|
| engine | Hybrid agent-based + system-dynamics + LLM scenario narrators |
|---|
| outputs | Scenario decks + leading indicators + intervention catalogue |
|---|
M9-S4 — Civic Co-Design
| mechanisms | - Citizens' assemblies
- Deliberative polling
- Open consultations
- Petition rights
|
|---|
| feedbackLoop | Findings feed into Codex + Constitution amendments |
|---|
M9-S5 — Public Verifier
| endpoint | GET /public-verifier/:anchorId |
|---|
| verification | Merkle proof + Sigstore + ML-DSA-44 + zk-SNARK auditor access |
|---|
| use | Civil society + press validate signed bulletins offline |
|---|
M10 — Governance Invariance + Meta-Invariance Verification Systems
+ Formal verification layer for governance invariants (must-always-hold properties) and meta-invariants (properties of the invariant set itself), using Coq + TLA+ + SMT/Z3 + OPA — producing machine-verifiable evidence.
+ InvarianceMeta-InvarianceCoqTLA+SMT/Z3OPAverification
+ M10-S1 — Governance Invariants Catalog
| I1 | Kill-switch always reachable within SLA |
|---|
| I2 | Every Tier-1 inference produces signed envelope |
|---|
| I3 | No prohibited (EU AI Act Art 5) request reaches model |
|---|
| I4 | No PII leaves jurisdiction without lawful basis |
|---|
| I5 | Cognitive Resonance breach triggers escalation |
|---|
| I6 | All deploys are Sigstore + ML-DSA-44 signed |
|---|
| I7 | Annex IV pack assembles within ≤ 30 min |
|---|
M10-S2 — Verification Tooling
| coq | Mechanised proofs for control-flow invariants of MGK + sidecar |
|---|
| tla | Liveness + safety for kill-switch + escalation + replay |
|---|
| smtZ3 | Bounded-model checking of OPA Rego + policy DSL |
|---|
| opa | Production runtime enforcement of decidable subset |
|---|
M10-S3 — Meta-Invariants
| MI-1 | Invariant set is consistent (no pair contradicts) |
|---|
| MI-2 | Adding a new invariant must not break existing proofs (compositional) |
|---|
| MI-3 | Each invariant has a regulator-mappable obligation |
|---|
| MI-4 | Each invariant has machine-checkable proof or adversarial test set |
|---|
M10-S4 — Adversarial Break Harness
| scale | ≥ 10 000 polymorphic attacks per release on each invariant |
|---|
| library | Reused from M5 red-team + invariant-specific fuzzers |
|---|
| gate | Block release if any invariant breaks under harness |
|---|
M10-S5 — Certification Bundle
| format | Signed JSON pointing to Coq proof artifacts + TLA+ specs + Z3 .smt2 + OPA rego digests |
|---|
| signing | Ed25519 + ML-DSA-65; WORM-anchored |
|---|
| consumers | - MRM
- Internal Audit
- Regulator
- AISI
|
|---|
M11 — Epistemic + Ontological Alignment + Existential Coordination + Value Negotiation Systems
+ Higher-order alignment systems: Epistemic Alignment (shared facts), Ontological Alignment (shared concepts), Existential Coordination (cross-actor survival cooperation), and Value Negotiation (resolving conflicting preferences).
+ Epistemic AlignmentOntological AlignmentExistential CoordinationValue Negotiation
+ M11-S1 — Epistemic Alignment System
| purpose | Maintain shared, reproducible factual ground between firm AI + regulators + civil society |
|---|
| mechanisms | - Signed evidence registry
- Reproducible replay
- Public verifier
- Citation provenance
|
|---|
| metric | Fact-disagreement rate ≤ 1 % on golden disclosure corpus |
|---|
M11-S2 — Ontological Alignment System
| purpose | Shared concept lattice across regimes + cultures |
|---|
| mechanisms | - Cross-regime glossary
- Multilingual ontology graph
- Concept drift monitor
|
|---|
| metric | Concept-mapping coverage ≥ 95 % across EU, US, UK, SG, HK, JP, KR |
|---|
M11-S3 — Existential Coordination System
| purpose | Cross-actor coordination on survival-critical decisions (frontier + climate + bio) |
|---|
| mechanisms | - FTEWS alerts
- Hotline + dead-man's switch
- Joint stress tests
- Crisis ladder
|
|---|
| metric | Hotline drill latency ≤ 5 min between any two signatories |
|---|
M11-S4 — Value Negotiation System
| purpose | Resolve conflicting preferences across stakeholders |
|---|
| mechanisms | - Deliberative polling + LLM-assisted summarisation (judged for fairness)
- Quadratic voting on policy choices
- Multistakeholder veto for civil-society redlines
|
|---|
| metric | Inter-stakeholder satisfaction ≥ 0.7 (1=full agreement) |
|---|
M11-S5 — Integration with Codex + Constitution
| loop | Findings + drift signals feed Codex updates + constitutional amendments |
|---|
| cadence | Codex review semi-annual; Constitution amendments rare (≥ 2/3 + 5-yr cooldown) |
|---|
| evidence | Signed deliberation records + outcome envelopes anchored in WORM + GIEN |
|---|
M12 — Unified Meta-Invariant Framework (UMIF) + Self-Proving Systems + Policy DSL
+ UMIF unifies invariants, meta-invariants, and alignment systems under one machine-verifiable framework; Self-Proving Systems generate proof obligations on demand; Policy DSL targets Coq + TLA+ + SMT/Z3 + OPA + Kubernetes + PCR/PCO repair.
+ UMIFSelf-Proving SystemsPolicy DSLCoqTLA+Z3OPAPCR/PCO
+ M12-S1 — UMIF Reference Model
| layers | - L1 — Invariants (decidable runtime)
- L2 — Meta-Invariants (composition, consistency)
- L3 — Alignment Systems (epistemic/ontological/existential/value)
- L4 — Constitutional Articles (highest law)
|
|---|
| compositionRules | - L1 must refine L2
- L2 must refine L3
- L3 must refine L4
- Conflict → escalate to Civilizational Governance Council
|
|---|
M12-S2 — Self-Proving Systems
| principle | Each policy ships with proof obligations + proofs (or test certificates) |
|---|
| obligations | POs auto-derived from policy DSL AST + invariant catalog |
|---|
| proofs | Coq tactic library + TLA+ model checking + SMT/Z3 dispatch |
|---|
| fallback | If proof undecidable, ship signed adversarial-test certificate (≥ 10 000 attacks) |
|---|
M12-S3 — Policy DSL
| syntax | Typed DSL with policy/invariant/obligation primitives; compiles to Coq / TLA+ / Z3 / Rego / Kustomize |
|---|
| example | policy KillSwitchSLA { invariant: kill_switch_latency_p95 <= 60s; obligation: prove(I1, coq); enforcement: opa(kill_switch_gate); } |
|---|
| tooling | policy-dsl CLI + LSP + VSCode plugin + CI integration |
|---|
M12-S4 — PCR / PCO Repair
| PCR | Policy Compliance Reconciliation — auto-rewrite policy to restore invariants |
|---|
| PCO | Policy Compliance Optimisation — minimise side-effects + cost |
|---|
| engine | SMT-guided synthesis + LLM-assisted refactor with safety guardrails |
|---|
| evidence | Signed repair envelope + before/after proofs |
|---|
M12-S5 — K8s Integration + Operator
| operator | UMIF Operator watches CRDs (Policy, Invariant, Obligation, AlignmentChannel) |
|---|
| admission | Validating webhook + Gatekeeper constraints generated from DSL |
|---|
| drift | Hourly reconciliation + WORM-logged |
|---|
| release | Block release if proof coverage < 0.95 or break-harness fails |
|---|
M13 — Minimal Governance Kernel (MGK) Runtime + Adversarial Break Harness
+ Minimal Governance Kernel: a small, formally-verified runtime providing must-always-hold governance properties to any AI workload, with an adversarial break harness running ≥ 10 000 attacks per release.
+ MGKminimal kernelformal verificationadversarial break harness
+ M13-S1 — MGK Goals + Non-Goals
| goals | - Always-on enforcement of kill-switch reachability
- Always-on Sigstore + ML-DSA-44 verify on workload start
- Always-on WORM emit for decisions
- Always-on PII redaction
- Always-on egress allow-list
- Always-on Cognitive Resonance check
|
|---|
| nonGoals | - Business logic
- Model serving
- Vendor-specific features
|
|---|
| footprint | < 10 KLOC; ≤ 32 MB resident |
|---|
M13-S2 — Architecture
| components | - eBPF data-plane shims (egress + redaction)
- OPA bundle (decidable subset of Policy DSL)
- Sigstore + ML-DSA verifier
- WORM emitter (Kafka client)
- Multisig kill-switch listener
- Cognitive Resonance heartbeat
|
|---|
| language | Rust core + Go shims + C/libbpf |
|---|
| tee | Optional SEV-SNP / TDX enclave |
|---|
M13-S3 — Formal Verification
| coq | Functional correctness of policy evaluator + WORM emitter |
|---|
| tla | Liveness + safety of kill-switch + escalation |
|---|
| smtZ3 | OPA Rego bundle decision-tree exhaustiveness |
|---|
| coverage | ≥ 95 % proof coverage on safety-critical paths |
|---|
M13-S4 — Adversarial Break Harness
| scale | ≥ 10 000 attacks per release; expanded weekly |
|---|
| categories | - Prompt injection variations
- Sidecar bypass attempts
- WORM tampering
- Kill-switch race conditions
- Egress smuggling
- Time-of-check/time-of-use
- Memory-safety probes
|
|---|
| gate | 0 failures on release candidate; auto-block on regression |
|---|
| reporting | Signed harness report PDF/A + JSON; WORM-anchored |
|---|
M13-S5 — Operational Lifecycle
| release | 90-day rotation; emergency hot-fix path with multisig |
|---|
| deployment | DaemonSet + per-pod sidecar; Tier-1 fail-closed |
|---|
| telemetry | OpenTelemetry GenAI; Falco eBPF rules |
|---|
| monitoring | Heartbeat + tamper detection + kill-switch readiness |
|---|
M14 — Integrated Operating Model + 2026-2030 Roadmap + Regulator/Auditor Evidence Pack
+ End-to-end operating model unifying ISO 42001 AIMS, MRM, AGI Containment, and Civilizational Governance — with a 5-year roadmap and a regulator/auditor-ready evidence pack generator.
+ operating model2026-2030 roadmapevidence pack
+ M14-S1 — Integrated Operating Model
| lanes | - AIMS lane (ISO 42001 Cl 4-10 lifecycle)
- MRM lane (SR 11-7 + PRA + MAS + HKMA)
- AGI Containment lane (Sentinel Lab + SRASE + red-team)
- Civilizational lane (treaty + Codex + Transparency + UMIF + MGK)
|
|---|
| interfaces | Per-lane CRS-UUID lineage; cross-lane events via GIEN |
|---|
| decisionRights | Board → CAIO/CRO/CISO → AI Safety Lead → MGK runtime |
|---|
M14-S2 — 2026 — AIMS + MRM + SRASE Day-90
| milestones | - ISO 42001 Stage 2 audit passed
- Model Risk Policy v3 board-approved
- SRASE GA + composite score ≥ 0.9 sustained
- Sentinel AGI Containment Lab live
- MGK v1 in production for Tier-1
- Cert score Silver
|
|---|
M14-S3 — 2027-2028 — Treaty Onboarding + UMIF GA
| 2027 | - GIEN ingress/egress live
- Global Audit API consumer onboarded
- Cert Gold
- UMIF GA across Tier-1
- Invariance + Meta-Invariance proofs published
|
|---|
| 2028 | - Treaty obligations fully met
- Public Transparency Portal v2 (zk-SNARK)
- Civilizational Codex v1 ratified
- CSE-X scenario library v1
|
|---|
M14-S4 — 2029-2030 — Civilizational Steady-State
| 2029 | - Cert Platinum
- MGK formal proof coverage ≥ 0.97
- Cultural Resonance Archive integrated
- Existential Coordination drills with 5+ signatories
|
|---|
| 2030 | - Treaty universal accession
- Constitutional review conference contribution
- CSE-X 50-year horizon scenarios published
- Board literacy ≥ 95 %
|
|---|
M14-S5 — Regulator/Auditor Evidence Pack Generator
| inputs | - AIMS Manual + Annex A evidence
- Model Risk Policy + validation reports
- SRASE composite scores
- Sentinel Lab + red-team reports
- Cognitive Resonance logs
- MGK harness + proofs
- Cert score + Global Audit API receipts
- Treaty obligation attestations
|
|---|
| output | Signed PDF/A + JSON bundle (PAdES + Sigstore + ML-DSA-65); ≤ 45 min assembly |
|---|
| audiences | - ISO 42001 auditor
- EU AI Act notified body
- SR 11-7 examiner
- AISI inspector
- Treaty secretariat
- Board
- Civil society (redacted)
|
|---|
Code Examples (16)
+ CE-01 — ISO 42001 Clause 6.1 — Risk register row (JSON) (json)
{
+ "riskId": "R-AIMS-014",
+ "clause": "6.1",
+ "description": "GenAI advisor fiduciary breach",
+ "likelihood": "M", "impact": "H",
+ "controls": ["pre_flight_guardrail", "fiduciary_cosine_check", "judge_ensemble"],
+ "owner": "caio",
+ "regimeMappings": ["EU AI Act Art 14", "FCA Consumer Duty", "MAS FEAT"]
+}
+CE-02 — Annex A control catalog entry (YAML) (yaml)
controlId: A.7.2
+category: validation
+title: Independent challenge of Tier-1 models
+objective: Ensure 2LoD effective challenge
+implementation:
+ - Independent re-implementation
+ - Counterfactual analysis
+ - Champion-challenger
+mappings:
+ euAiAct: [Art 9, Art 15]
+ sr117: [section: effective_challenge]
+ iso42001: [Cl 8.3, Cl 9.1]
+ gdpr: [Art 22]
+owner: head-of-mrm
+
CE-03 — CRS-UUID lineage emitter (Python) (python)
def emit_lineage(src, dst, edge_type):
+ edge = {
+ 'edgeId': uuid7(),
+ 'src': src, 'dst': dst,
+ 'edgeType': edge_type,
+ 'ts': iso_now(),
+ 'signer': SIGNER_ID,
+ }
+ edge['signature'] = sign_hybrid(edge)
+ kafka.send('crsLineage.v1', key=edge['src'], value=json.dumps(edge))
+CE-04 — OPA gate — Tier-1 admission (Rego) (rego)
package admit.tier1
+
+default allow = false
+
+allow {
+ input.review.object.metadata.labels.tier == "t1"
+ input.review.object.spec.runtimeClassName == "kata"
+ input.review.annotations["sigstore.dev/verified"] == "true"
+ input.review.annotations["pqc.fips204/verified"] == "true"
+ input.review.annotations["mgk.injected"] == "true"
+}
+CE-05 — Cognitive Resonance breach handler (Go) (go)
func OnResonance(report ResonanceReport) error {
+ if report.Breach == "none" { return nil }
+ if err := emitSEV("sev1", report); err != nil { return err }
+ if report.Breach == "fiduciary" || report.Breach == "latent" {
+ return logicalKillSwitch(report.ModelID)
+ }
+ return nil
+}
+CE-06 — SRASE inspection runner (Python) (python)
def run_srase(pack_id, persona):
+ artifacts = load_pack(pack_id)
+ scores = {}
+ for wf in WORKFLOWS[persona]:
+ scores[wf] = wf.score(artifacts)
+ composite = weighted(scores)
+ report = build_report(pack_id, persona, scores, composite)
+ return sign_pades_sigstore_mldsa(report)
+CE-07 — TLA+ — kill-switch liveness (tla)
MODULE KillSwitch
+VARIABLES armed, acked
+
+Arm == /\ ~armed /\ armed' = TRUE
+Ack(n) == /\ armed /\ acked' = acked \cup {n}
+Live == []<>(armed => Cardinality(acked) >= QUORUM)
+CE-08 — Coq — invariant I1 reachability (coq)
Theorem kill_switch_reachable :
+ forall s : state, in_sev0 s -> exists s', step s s' /\ kill_switch_armed s'.
+Proof.
+ intros. apply step_armed_in_sev0. assumption.
+Qed.
+
CE-09 — Z3 — Rego decidability check (python)
from z3 import *
+x = Int('x')
+s = Solver()
+s.add(Or(x < 0, x >= 60))
+print(s.check()) # check that no admit-allowing path bypasses kill-switch SLA
+CE-10 — Policy DSL example (DSL) (policy)
policy KillSwitchSLA {
+ invariant: kill_switch_latency_p95 <= 60s;
+ obligation: prove(I1, coq);
+ obligation: model(KillSwitch, tla);
+ enforcement: opa(kill_switch_gate);
+ harness: adversarial(10000, kill_switch_race);
+}
+CE-11 — UMIF Operator CRD (YAML) (yaml)
apiVersion: umif.firm.io/v1
+kind: Policy
+metadata: { name: kill-switch-sla, tier: t1 }
+spec:
+ invariantRefs: [I1]
+ obligationRefs: [coq/I1, tla/KillSwitch]
+ enforcement: { opa: kill_switch_gate }
+ harness: { attacks: 10000, suite: kill_switch_race }
+CE-12 — MGK eBPF egress shim (C) (c)
SEC("tc")
+int mgk_egress(struct __sk_buff *skb) {
+ if (!allowlist_match(skb)) {
+ bpf_ringbuf_output(&events, &evt, sizeof(evt), 0);
+ return TC_ACT_SHOT;
+ }
+ return TC_ACT_OK;
+}
+CE-13 — Automated Sanctions Engine — decision (Python) (python)
def decide_sanction(input):
+ out = opa_decide('sanctions/v1', input)
+ if out.grade in ('G5','G6'):
+ require_dual_control(out)
+ order = build_order(out)
+ return sign_and_publish(order)
+CE-14 — Global Audit API consumer (TypeScript) (typescript)
const res = await fetch(`${GA_API}/v1/replay/${envelopeId}`, {
+ headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${treatyToken}` },
+});
+const replay = await res.json();
+await wormEmit('audit.read', { envelopeId, supervisor: 'ECB-SSM', ts: now() });
+CE-15 — GIEN event publisher (Node.js) (typescript)
export async function gienEmit(evt: GienEvent) {
+ evt.sig = await signHybrid(evt);
+ await gienClient.send({ topic: evt.type, messages: [{ key: evt.scope, value: JSON.stringify(evt) }] });
+ await wormEmit('gien.out', { id: evt.id });
+}
+CE-16 — PCR/PCO repair driver (Python) (python)
def repair(policy, invariants):
+ issues = check(policy, invariants)
+ if not issues: return policy
+ suggestions = smt_synthesize(policy, issues)
+ refactored = llm_safe_refactor(policy, suggestions)
+ proof = prove_or_harness(refactored, invariants)
+ return sign_repair_envelope(policy, refactored, proof)
+